View clinical trials related to Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Filter by:People with chronic inflammatory arthritis (IA) (rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis), often have a reduced work ability. Up to 40% lose their job in the first years after diagnosis. Consequently, they are at high risk of losing their jobs and being permanently excluded from the labour market. Therefore, a new context-specific vocational rehabilitation (VR) for people with IA was developed, based on the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions. The 6-months VR is called WORK-ON and consists of three parts: 1) a coordinating occupational therapist who performs an initial assessment and goalsetting process and supports cooperation between relevant partners and navigation between sectors, 2) Four group sessions with peers and if needed, 3) Individual sessions with a social worker, nurse, or physiotherapist. The objective of the WORK-ON trial is to test the overall efficacy on work ability compared to a control group who receives usual care and pamphlets for their employer and colleagues. Based on the experiences from a feasibility study, WORK-ON will be conducted as a randomised controlled trial. Patients with IA, aged 18 years or older, experiencing job insecurity will be randomised to one of two groups: the WORK-ON VR group or usual care (control group). The primary outcome; work ability measured is measured by Work Ability Index single item, at baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 30 months after baseline. Secondary outcomes are absenteeism, presenteeism, overall work impairment, activity impairment, job loss, quality of life, mental well-being, fatigue, sleep, physical activity, occupational balance and pain. Secondary outcomes are measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months after baseline. In addition, work ability, working hours per week and job loss are measured at 18 and 30 months after baseline.
In individuals with rheumatoid arthritis, the most significant symptom is the loss of manual ability and function in the hands. In rheumatoid arthritis, where patient-reported assessment scales are frequently used, hand skills should be evaluated with an ideal questionnaire that best represents hand activities. The ABILHAND-RA questionnaire possesses all these features, being a short and easily fillable survey. The aim is to determine of clinically significant cutoff scores for perceived manual ability evaluated by ABILHAND corresponding to observed and perceived upper extremity assessments in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis.
The aim of this study is to investigate the beneficial impacts of the 6-week standardized CR program applied to hypertensive RA patients whose disease activity is under control with regular pharmacological treatment. Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: 1.) standard of care (SOC) treatment or 2.) SOC plus a 6 week CR program.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the comparability of ianalumab exposure following the sub-cutaneous (s.c.) administration of one injection of 300 mg/2 mL auto-injector (AI) versus two injections of 150 mg/1 mL pre-filled syringe (PFS), and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ianalumab following the s.c. administration of both devices in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Sjögren's disease (SjD), or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). A second optional cohort may be included with the objective of demonstrating the comparability of pharmacokinetics of ianalumab between 1 x 2 mL Pre-filled Syringe (PFS) and 2 x 1 mL PFS.
SUMMARY Background: Several studies have shown physical activity (PA) to be inversely correlated to disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. However, it is unclear whether improved PA leads to lower disease activity or if low disease activity predicts improved PA in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Furthermore, it is unknown how fibromyalgia (FM) affects this interaction. Objective(s): Our primary objective will be to compare the effect of an immediate improvement in physical activity after one week on the proportion of RA patients achieving low disease activity after 12 weeks of biological treatment. Furthermore, we will explore whether the presence of concomitant FM affects this clinical response (i.e., interaction between FM status and PA response). Design: A prospective cohort study in the form of a target-trial attempting to address a causal question comparing the outcome among the participants with an immediate improvement in physical activity, relative to individuals without. Setting and patients: Biologically naive RA patients initiating biological treatment are consecutively enrolled. PA is quantified by accelerometry one week prior to, one week after, and after 3 months of biological treatment. Sample size: 100 RA patients starting biological therapy is planned enrolled in the study. Measurements: RA patients will be divided into two groups depending on their improvement in physical activity after onset of biological treatment. The percentage of time spent in moderate-to-vigorously physical activity (MVPA) i.e., the percentage of time a patient is in motion [walking, running, bicycling, or swimming] is measured prior to, one week, and approximately 3 months after biological treatment onset, respectively. The MVPA ratio (MVPA After biological treatment/MVPA Before biological treatment) will divide patients enabling a contrast between two groups: Those with high improvement considering MVPA (after 1 week; the upper tertile of MVPA ratio of the sample) and those without. Treatment response (achieving a disease activity score < 3.2) after approximately 3 months from baseline will be analyzed as the contrast between groups.
To study the effect of silymarin against methotrexate-induced liver injury in rheumatic diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatric arthritis and psoriasis
Brief Summary: This is a randomized, double-blind study comparing LNK01001 to placebo in Chinese participants with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who are on a stable dose of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and have an inadequate response or Intolerance to biologic DMARDs(bDMARDs). The study objective of Period 1 (Day 1 to Week 24) is to compare the safety and efficacy of LNK01001 12 mg twice daily (BID) versus placebo for the treatment of signs and symptoms of participants with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are on a stable dose of csDMARDs and had an inadequate response to or intolerance to at least 1 bDMARD. The study objective of Period 2 (Week 24 to Week 76) is to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of LNK01001 12 mg BID in participants with RA who completed Period 1.
The goal of this non interventional study is to evaluate the use of Tyenne, a tocilizumab biosimilar, in a real world setting in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients over a period of 12 months. The main questions it aims to answer are: - What is the patients' persistence on Tyenne (patient's ability to continue the treatment for the prescribed duration), 6 months after treatment start? - What is the patients' persistence on Tyenne (patient's ability to continue the treatment for the prescribed duration), 12 months after treatment start? The decision of prescribing Tyenne will be done by the physician independently, prior to patient enrolment in the study. Enrolled patients will be followed for 12 months following Tyenne treatment start, or until they permanently discontinue Tyenne. There will be one baseline visit and three follow-up visits at approximately 3, 6 and 12 months after Tyenne treatment initiation. All follow-up visits will be conducted according to the physician current clinical practice and are not imposed due to this protocol.
Periodontitis is a common chronic inflammatory disease characterised by the destruction of the soft and hard tissues supporting the tooth, including alveolar bone, periodontal ligament and cementum. Periodontitis has been associated with different host characteristics such as diabetes or neutrophil disorders and environmental factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption and stress. On the other hand, periodontal bacterial infection triggers a systemic immune response that is associated with an increased risk of different disorders such as bacterial pneumonia, cardiovascular disease and autoimmune diseases. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a severe chronic autoimmune disease of unknown etiology, characterised by symmetrical, erosive synovitis of the joints, sometimes with multisystem organ involvement, joint destruction and excessive bone loss. Although the etiology of RA is unknown, it is thought to occur in individuals with genetic predisposition as a result of exposure to various environmental factors. RA and periodontitis are chronic destructive inflammatory diseases with common genetic and environmental risk factors, pathogenesis mechanisms and complex multifactorial pathological processes. Several studies suggest that periodontitis, a common inflammatory disease of the periodontium surrounding the teeth and triggered by bacteria in the mouth, is associated with RA and may initiate and worsen inflammation in RA. Non-surgical periodontal treatment (COPT), which is considered the gold standard in the treatment of periodontitis with hand instruments and ultrasonic instruments, has been shown to provide significant improvements in the clinical outcomes of periodontitis patients with RA. COPT is performed to stop the progression of periodontal diseases. Considering the studies supporting the bidirectional relationship between periodontitis and RA, it is thought that COPT may affect the clinical and biochemical values of RA. Based on these points, the aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between serum and salivary ANGPTL-4, MMP-13, TNF-α and IL-6 levels and periodontal disease in individuals with RA and to evaluate the effects of COPT on RA disease severity in vivo.
Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune condition, causing inflammation and pain. Yet pain may persist even when inflammation has been treated. This residual pain, called nociplastic pain, has symptoms of a chronic pain condition called fibromyalgia. There are few effective therapies to address this residual pain. Published literature shows that fibromyalgia can be treated by neurofeedback, a noninvasive method that is based on the voluntary modulation of cortical activity. In this pilot study, the investigators want to test the effect of neurofeedback on the fibromyalgia component of pain in rheumatoid arthritis, and also to investigate its effects on related symptoms such as fatigue and sleep disturbance.