View clinical trials related to Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Filter by:This study is a 24-months, non-inferiority randomized, controlled trial with two parallel arms to determine if a new follow-up strategy for patients with RA is non-inferior in maintaining comprehensive disease control measured as simultaneous maintenance of structural, functional and clinical treatment target at 2-year follow-up compared to the conventional follow-up regimen with regular hospital visits.
The primary objective of the STAR study is to investigate how measures of disease activity and measures for cognition, physical activity and performance behave in ageing population controls and patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). If an differential effect of age on outcome over time is apparent, the presence of an inclination point will be assessed. The secondary objective is to investigate additional factors (e.g. lifestyle factors) that might explain any differences between ageing controls and RA patients. The STAR study is an observational cross-sectional matched case-control study including 420 RA patients and 420 population controls between 55-85 years of age, stratified by five year intervals. All participants will complete generic and RA-specific questionnaires. A subset of 180 participants will be visiting the research center for physical examination and performance tests. Expected outcomes include practical age-specific reference curves that will be constructed for a selection of outcomes (e.g. DAS28). It is expected that as RA is characterized by tender and painful joints, e.g. the number of tender joints has a higher starting point in RA patients than in the general population. This will most likely increase in both groups with age, although the general population may catch up at an older age. Measures of cognitive status may show a steeper decline with age in RA patients compared to the general population. Measures of physical activity and performance will presumably have a worse starting point in RA patients than in the general population, and might show a steep decline with age. The general population might however catch up with the patients with RA. Most probably, age will not be the only factor explaining 'worse' outcomes in both RA patients and the general population. Other factors such as lifestyle factors (e.g. smoking, diet, BMI, occupation) and comorbidities will probably play a role.
Current standard of care of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management includes a routine clinical assessment of disease activity to adjust therapy. For the most part, therapy adjustment for therapy non-response and/or suboptimal therapy response leads to therapy switch within the same class of therapy or to a different class of therapy. The lack of objective data to titrate dose of a given therapeutic agent for maximal possible efficacy makes it difficult for providers and payors to titrate dose as needed. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) provides objective data for a proactive and individualized therapy optimization based on serum drug levels and the presence or absence of anti-drug antibodies. Maintaining optimal trough drug concentration is a proven concept of therapeutics. With respect to adalimumab, this approach helps to maximize therapeutic efficacy and prevent anti-adalimumab antibody development. However, lack of drug and disease state specific published data creates a barrier for a wider adoption of TDM into clinical practice. The objective of this single site, open label, randomized, parallel group pilot study is to investigate whether proactive therapeutic drug monitoring based adalimumab dose optimization results in higher rate of achieving and/or maintaining therapeutic goal compared to standard of care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
The aim of this study is to observe the clinical efficacy and safety of abatacept combined with JAK inhibitor in the treatment of D2TRA patients
DensityTM, an amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC) imported by Universal Integrated Corporation, is tried to demonstrate its efficacy and safety in rheumatoid arthritis patient with osteopenia or osteoporosis, compared to crystalized calcium carbonate (CCC).
In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the consensual 1st line conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) of RA is methotrexate (MTX). In case of contra-indication or intolerance to MTX, leflunomide is an alternative. If the treatment target is not achieved with csDMARD strategy, addition of a biological DMARD (TNF inhibitors, anti-Interleukin 6 (anti-IL6)), abatacept, or rituximab) or a targeted synthetic (ts) DMARD (JAK inhibitors) is considered. Current practice is to start a bDMARD (biologic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs) and especially TNF inhibitors (etanercept or monoclonal anti-TNF antibodies) with the benefit of hindsight. However, abatacept and TNF inhibitors have demonstrated similar efficacy in patients with insufficient response to csDMARD (AMPLE trial). Although abatacept has shown a very good tolerance profile that might be superior to other bDMARDs rheumatologists might be reluctant to use it as a first line bDMARD as there is a belief of a slower efficacy compared to other bDMARDs or JAK inhibitors. Indeed, in real world study, compared to TNF inhibitors it seems that discontinuation of abatacept is more related to lack of effectiveness than safety issues. Investigators have hypothesized that first rapidly controlling the inflammation phase, using TNF inhibitors followed by abatacept to induce an immunological remission would optimize response and tolerance of ACPA positive patients with RA. To demonstrate our hypothesis, the investigaors propose a randomized controlled trial with one arm receiving an induction therapy for 12 weeks with a TNF inhibitor followed by a cell-targeted bDMARD (abatacept) and the other arm, receiving TNF inhibitors.
Patient preference and experience can impact patients' adherence and persistence regarding a treatment, especially when switching. A number of factors contribute to this, including their beliefs, fears, expectations, and overall knowledge. This is compounded by the fact that many switched patients are not trained on how to use the new injection device. Specifically, some patients report a degraded experience with current adalimumab biosimilars (40mg/0.8mL) as compared to the originator: injections appear more painful and seem to cause more bruising. Indeed, treatment-related factors such as treatment volume or the presence of citrate have the potential to negatively impact patient experience and contribute to local reactions at or around the injection site, such as pain and swelling. Yuflyma® (CT-P17 adalimumab), developed by Celltrion Inc., is a biosimilar of the anti-TNF treatment adalimumab, having obtained a marketing authorisation from the European Commission on 11th February 2021 (addressed to Celltrion Healthcare). Yuflyma® is the first high-concentration adalimumab biosimilar (40mg/0.4mL) available in France, which makes the product similar to the currently available adalimumab originator formula in terms of drug concentration. Studying patient experience over the course of a switch involves querying patients at the time of prescription, while they are still under the previous treatment, and for the following 3 months, during which they have been able to pick up their prescribed medication from a pharmacy and have started using the new treatment. Describing patient experience over the course of a switch from another adalimumab (originator or biosimilar) to Yuflyma® would contribute to identifying significant factors which contribute to patient experience and satisfaction. Our primary objective is to assess patients' overall satisfaction with the injection after the switch to the high-concentration adalimumab biosimilar Yuflyma®, at 3 months following the initiation, compared to their experience with the previous adalimumab. - Overall satisfaction with the injection (7-level likert) before initiation - Overall satisfaction with the injection (7-level likert) 3 months after initiation
Through real-world observation, understanding clinical efficacy and safety of treatment with YISAIPU (etanercept biosimilar) for RA patients of Fujian Province for three years
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a public health issue because of its frequency, its functional consequences, the risk of morbidity and mortality and the costs incurred. A collaborative multiprofessional intervention initiated during hospitalization and continued after hospital discharge (ambulatory care ) would improve medication adherence in RA and therefore the health status of patients. Main objective: To compare, 12 months after the index hospitalization or consultation, the impact of pharmaceutical care provided in multiprofessional collaboration (pharmacist-physician) on medication adherence to disease-modifying treatments of patients with RA compared to usual care without pharmaceutical care and specific multi-professional collaboration. Medication adherence to disease-modifying treatments will be assessed by the rate of coverage of disease-modifying treatments (or Medication Possession Ratio (MPR)). METHODOLOGY: Interventional, multicenter, controlled, randomized, open label study, comparing in parallel 2 groups of patients with rheumatoid arthritis initially hospitalized in a rheumatology department (pharmaceutical care provided in multiprofessional collaboration (pharmacist-physician), initiated in the hospital and continued after hospital discharge (ambulatory care) vs traditional follow-up.
The quantitative and qualitative analysis of RA lung involvement in the Hungarian population