View clinical trials related to Retrognathia.
Filter by:This study aims at evaluating the effects of mandibular advancement on pharyngeal airway space and nocturnal breathing in children with skeletal class II division1 malocclusion. Fifty patients will be enrolled in the study divided into control and experimental groups.
Patients with class II malocclusion and retrognathic mandibles will be treated using functional appliances and asses the remodeling that is expected to occur in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and we will register mandibular movements using electronic axiograph ( a specific apparatus used to record jaw movements in three dimensions). There are three groups : 1. Activator Group 2. Twin block Group 3. Control Group with no treatment. Patients will be allocated to the three groups randomly. Data will be collected using three different approaches: - CBCT images before treatment and 12 months after treatment - Axiograph registrations before treatment and 12 months after treatment
Differences in nasotracheal intubation pathway anatomy will be observed between healthy patients and patients with maxillary retrusion. The results will clarify the nasotracheal intubation tube preference for these patients.
Distraction osteogenesis is a powerful technique for creating new bone during significant lengthening of the mandible without the need for bone grafting and associated donor site morbidity. The idea of distraction osteogenesis was largely abandoned by many until the 1950s. Ilizarov minimized complications by performing a corticotomy with minimal disruption of the surrounding blood supply and using a system of tension ring fixators to control the distraction in multiple planes. Through a series of experimental studies and clinical applications, Ilizarov established the foundation of distraction osteogenesis and its role in orthopedic management. Applications in craniofacial surgery were first seen in 1973, when Synder et al applied the approach to mandibular lengthening in a canine animal model. Almost another 20 years passed before McCarthy and colleagues published, in 1992, the first report of mandibular lengthening in 4 children with congenital mandibular deficiency, 3 with hemifacial microsomia, and 1 with Nager syndrome. Thereafter, its role rapidly expanded to the midface and nearly all classic approaches to craniofacial reconstruction. In general, mandibular distraction can be performed in the ramus for ramus lengthening, in the mandibular angle for downward and forward advancement, or in the mandibular body. Ramus or gonial angle distraction are mainly used to treat facial asymmetries as in hemifacial macrosomia. Severe mandibular retrognathia can be classified as congenital or acquired. Congenital abnormalities that are associated with severe mandibular retrognathia or micrognathia include craniofacial syndromes such as hemifacial microsomia, Pierre-Robin syndrome, Treacher-Collins syndrome, and Nager syndrome. Adult patients with craniofacial syndromes may have undergone previous surgery at an earlier age, but unfavorable postsurgical growth or skeletal relapse may have occurred. Severe mandibular retrognathia also can develop following maxillofacial trauma and mandibular fractures, which may have occurred in an adult or as a child Condylar fractures occurring at an early age can result in subsequent bony and/or fibrous temporomandibular joint ankylosis and/or deficient mandibular growth, also adult patients with complications from previous mandibular tumor resection and reconstruction can also present with acquired severe mandibular retrognathia that may require distraction osteogenesis as well. Despite the advantages of extra-oral distraction devices in the hands of clinicians (application for very small children, simplicity of attachment, ease of manipulation, bidirectional and multidirectional dis- traction), patients are apprehensive about wearing bulky external appliances because of the social inconvenience and the potential of permanent facial scars, these disadvantages and limitations were the primary force driving the evolution of mandibular lengthening and widening toward the development of intra-oral devices. However nowadays both internal and external distractors are used in a variety of indications in these cases each of the two types of distractor devices has its own advantages and disadvantages. Aim of the work: The aim of this study is to compare external and internal distraction devices for mandibular lengthening in terms of bone lengthening, patient comfort, and complications.
The correction of Class II malocclusion is one of the most common problems facing the orthodontist, with an estimated one-third of all orthodontic patients treated for this condition. Many strategies are available for Class II treatment on growing patients, and most orthodontists tend to choose a treatment protocol based on what part of the craniofacial deformity they believe the appliance will affect the most. A number of authors have described the dentoalveolar and skeletal changes induced by the Herbst appliance. The dentoalveolar effects consist of distalization of the maxillary molars and forward movement of the mandibular dentition. The main skeletal change "mandibular stimulation" is acceleration of a patient's inherent mandibular growth rather than increased growth beyond what would occur without treatment. Maxillary molar distalization, is one of the Class II treatment. Mini-implants have become popular in recent years, and various kinds of mini-implant-borne distalization approaches have been described. Because Class II correction appears to be achievable with either appliance, a follow-up question is whether there is a difference in the esthetic outcomes. However, because of the complexity of the human face and the subjectivity of facial beauty, a simple set of measures of lines or angles cannot quantify facial beauty. With the advances in 3-dimensional imaging, it is now possible to capture and superimpose digital images and measure the changes in the soft tissues from 3-dimensional images. Such advances in facial imaging allow a more thorough investigation of changes in 3 dimensions and prevent the inherent loss of information that results from 2-dimensional imaging. Optical scanners with short shutter speeds are convenient for clinicians and patients for capturing soft-tissue records. Bearing in mind that the aim of orthodontic treatment is to achieve facial harmony along with excellent occlusion, one of the most important objectives of an orthodontist should be the improvement of facial appearance. Therefore, it is important to gain a better understanding of how or whether orthodontic procedures affect the appearance of the soft tissues. Thus, the aim of this clinical trial is three dimensional evaluation of soft tissue facial changes on late mixed dentition patients following maxillary arch distalization with palatal screws one group and acrylic split herbst patients on other group and to compare these changes.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of Intravenous iron isomaltoside on maintaining hemoglobin concentration in patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Fifty-eight patients, aged 19 to 40 years, scheduled for Bimaxillary orthognathic surgery will be divided into monofer (n=29) and control (n=29) groups. Randomly selected patients of the ulinastatin group are given intravenous iron isomaltoside. In contrast, patients in the control group receive an equivalent volume of normal saline as a placebo. The primary endpoints are postoperative hemoglobin concentration.
Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, mono center, Phase III trial to compare EXACYL in preventive with placebo on perioperatory bleeding in orthognathism surgery.
Bicortical screws have been widely used for mandibular osteosynthesis during orthognathic surgery.Transoral placement of bicortical screws is a rigid fixation method in orthognathic surgery, which is less often used. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcome of transoral versus transbuccal bicortical screw placement during orthognathic surgery. This study comprises an academic, retrospective, monocentric study in which the charts of orthognathic patients operated between January 2010 and December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative complications were registered. Demographic, dental and surgical parameters are examined as potential risk factors for the occurence of postoperative complications.
Background: Some head and facial abnormalities are rare and present at birth. Others are more common, and may not show up until puberty. These conditions have different causes and characteristics. Researchers want to learn more about these conditions by comparing people with face, head, and neck abnormalities to family members and to healthy volunteers without such conditions. Objectives: To learn more about abnormal development of the face, head, and neck. To determine their genetic variants. Eligibility: People who have not had surgery for facial trauma: People ages 2 and older with craniofacial abnormalities (may participate offsite) Unaffected relatives ages 2 and older Healthy volunteers ages 6 and older Design: Participants will be screened with medical history and physical exam focusing on head, face, and neck Participants may be followed for several years. Visits may require staying near the clinic for a few days. A visit is required for the following developmental stages, along with follow-up visits: Age 2-6 Age 6-10 Age 11-17 Age 18 and older Visits may include: Medical history Physical exam Questionnaires Oral exam Blood and urine tests Cheek swab: a cotton swab will be wiped across the inside of the cheek several times. Cone beam CT scan (CBCT): x-rays create an image of the head, face, teeth, and neck. Participants will stand still or sit on a chair for about 20 minutes while the scanner rotates around the head. Photos of the head and face Offsite participants will provide: Copies of medical and dental records Leftover tissue samples from previous surgery Blood sample or cheek swab
patients were enrolled by the inclusion criteria and were undergo lefort 1 maxillary osteotomy. after the latency phase the distraction was done in anterior- posterior vector. patients were divided by randomized allocation in 2 groups. in group 1 the distractor was removed after consolation phase, and in group 2 fixation devices were placed immediately after removal of distractors. data regarding relapse were analyzed by lateral cephalogram X-ray taken in 3 different phases of the trial. change of occlusal plane and the "A point" of the cephalometric analysis were determined as reference point of the study.