Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Not yet recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT06251375 |
Other study ID # |
4569 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Not yet recruiting |
Phase |
Phase 4
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
July 2024 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2025 |
Study information
Verified date |
April 2024 |
Source |
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton |
Contact |
Jose Estrada |
Phone |
905-522-1155 |
Email |
jestrada[@]stjosham.on.ca |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Sedation remains a ubiquitous and crucial component of intensive care treatments in
critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. Sedation relieves anxiety, reduces distress,
and promotes tolerance of endotracheal intubation and associated life-sustaining
interventions such as mechanical ventilation, cardiovascular assistance, and renal support.
Thus, choosing the optimal sedative agent is vital to patient comfort, safety, and survival.
Despite more than 20 years of intensive care sedation research, there is still no consensus
on what constitutes best sedation practice. The Society of Critical Care Medicine, the
premier critical care organisation in North America, published the 2018 Clinical Practice
Guidelines on the management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility and Sleep
(PADIS) disruption (chaired by our primary applicant W.A.) and issued weak recommendations to
provide analgesia before sedation, to target light sedation whenever clinically feasible, and
to use either dexmedetomidine or propofol over midazolam for the sedation of mechanically
ventilated critically ill patients. Similarly, the American Thoracic Society produced a set
of Clinical Practice Guidelines to promote liberation and weaning from mechanical ventilation
in critically ill patients, with weak recommendations for the use of non-benzodiazepines as
primary sedatives and to target light sedation when clinically possible. A weak
recommendation was issued in an Intensive Care Medicine Rapid Practice Guideline published in
2022 to use dexmedetomidine over propofol for sedation of critically ill adults, if the
desired outcome is a reduction in delirium. These guidelines, however, do not consider
age-dependent pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, illness severity, timing of sedative
administration, operative vs medical reason for admission, or the changing dynamics of
sedation practice at different phases of critical illness. The lack of high-level evidence to
inform sedation practice in the critically ill has led to approaches that are mainly
opinion-based and lack the support of evidence from large multicentre, international
randomised clinical trials.
Description:
1. BACKGROUND
Current guidelines highlight evidence gaps to be addressed in future sedation trials,
particularly the need for adequately powered trials to evaluate impact of sedative
choice in older adults, as they have a highest overall mortality and the most common
demographic to require an ICU admission of all age groups.
Dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenergic agonist sedative, may be the solution. The SPICE III
trial, a prelude to the SPICE IV study, evaluated early sedation with dexmedetomidine
versus usual care sedation in 4000 critically ill patients. The SPICE III trial
identified a heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) on the primary outcome of 90-day
mortality, suggesting lower mortality in older patients. To further evaluate the
observed HTE, SPICE IV was designed as a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled
trial with a study population restricted to patients at or older than 65 years of age.
2. HYPOTHESIS
Early sedation with DEX as the primary sedative agent reduces 90-day all-cause mortality
in invasively mechanically ventilated patients who are ≥ 65 years of age.
3. OBJECTIVES
The primary aim is to determine whether, in invasively mechanically ventilated patients
who are ≥ 65 years of age, early sedation with DEX as the primary sedative agent reduces
90-day all-cause mortality.
The secondary aims are to assess the effect of DEX on ventilator free days, coma and
delirium free days, major adverse kidney events (MAKE-28) at day 28, duration of
ventilation, and hospital stay in survivors.
4. METHODS
This is a prospective, double-blind, placebo controlled, randomised trial of early sedation
with dexmedetomidine in invasively mechanically ventilated patients who are ≥ 65 years of age
and who are expected to remain ventilated more than one calendar day after randomization.
Randomization will occur via a secured website. A total of 300 patients will be recruited
across Canadian centres and assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either: early dexmedetomidine
(Intervention arm) or placebo (Control arm).Patients in the active intervention arm will
receive a dexmedetomidine infusion starting at a recommended dose of 1 µg/kg/h without a
loading dose. Patients in the control arm will receive normal saline at equivalent doses.
Analgesia will be optimized in both groups as clinically indicated. The sedation target is
defined by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -1 to +1 at all times,
unless otherwise clinically indicated.