View clinical trials related to Respiratory Insufficiency.
Filter by:This is an observational study that will be enrolling University of Louisville patients who present to the Emergency Department in Acute Respiratory Failure. This study will be to determine if the addition of Eko AI-assisted lung auscultation examination to a standard of care Pulmonary POCUS + assists with acute respiratory failure diagnosis.
Assessment of the dynamics of changes in physical, instrumental and laboratory parameters in patients with identified coronavirus infection complicated by acute respiratory failure included in the study in accordance with the inclusion criteria, and comparison of the results with the control group, study of the effect of modes when using vibroacoustic lung therapy.
The study was designed to understand the pathophysiology of gas exchange derangement in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Specifically we will evaluate the effect of 3 different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and two different levels of inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) on gas exchange by analyzing shunt and dead space. Furthermore, complete respiratory mechanics and distribution of ventilation and perfusion by electrical impedance tomography will be assessed at each level of PEEP.
The aim of this proposal is to study whether proning, a technique that has previously been shown to improve lung function in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), can prevent those with mild to moderate symptoms of COVID-19 from progressing to severe disease when initiated early, thereby averting intubation, reducing hospitalization, and, ultimately, decreasing mortality.
Esophageal atresia is a rare but severe malformation, and it requires early surgery. Coloesophagoplasty is surgical repair of the esophageal with an isoperistaltic transverse colon graft. In the postoperative period after coloesophagoplasty children require careful monitoring of fluid balance, because clinically significant fluid overload can lead to dysfunction of various organs and systems.
Neonatal mortality remains unacceptably high. Globally, the majority of mothers now deliver in health facilities in low resource settings where quality of newborn care is poor. Health systems strengthening through digitial quality improvement systems, such as the Neotree, are a potential solution. The overarching aim of this study is to complete the co-development of NeoTree-gamma with key functionalities configured, operationalised, tested and ready for large scale roll out across low resource settings. Specific study objectives are as follows: 1. To further develop and test the NeoTree at tertiary facilities in Malawi and Zimbabwe 2. To investigate HCPs and parent/carer view of the NeoTree, including how acceptable and usable HCWs find the app, and potential barriers and enablers to implementing/using it in practice. 3. To collect outcome data for newborns from representative sites where NeoTree is not implemented. 4. To test the clinical validity of key NeoTree diagnostic algorithms, e.g. neonatal sepsis and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) against gold standard or best available standard diagnoses. 5. To add dashboards and data linkage to the functionality of the NeoTree 6. To develop and test proof of concept for communicating daily electronic medical records (EMR) using NeoTree 7. To initiate a multi-country network of newborn health care workers, policy makers and academics. 8. To estimate cost of implementing NeoTree at all sites and potential costs at scale
ASOP is a prospective cohort study comparing three methods for assessing risk of self-induced lung injury in patients with acute respiratory failure being managed with pressure-support ventilation. We will describe the relationship between three different assessment methods for risk of self-induced lung injury and compare them to a gold standard measurement.
Prone position (PP) is standard of care for mechanically ventilated patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in the intensive care unit (ICU). Recommendations suggest PP durations of at least 16 hours. In 2020, COVID-19 pandemic led to a great number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation and PP in the ICU. Risk of ICU staff viral contamination and work overload led to prolongation of PP duration up to 48 hours. Here investigators report outcomes of prolonged PP sessions in terms of skin complications (pression injuries) and ventilatory improvement.
The purpose of this study is to learn more about problems with swallowing that could develop in patients who are very sick and need a machine to help them breathe.
Rapid-sequence intubation is routinely performed in critically ill patients. It is unclear whether different sedative agents may influence short-term outcomes after intubation, specially hemodynamic stability.