Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03171129
Other study ID # 5160055
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date September 2024
Est. completion date September 2025

Study information

Verified date April 2024
Source Loma Linda University
Contact Tina Ramirez
Phone 909-558-5828
Email TIRameriz@llu.edu
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study is to evaluate the feasibility of using a pressure limited nasal cannula system instead of a high flow nasal cannula system in the management of premature babies with respiratory distress.


Description:

NCPAP has been used increasingly to manage respiratory distress in newborns as well as apnea of prematurity. Humidified high flow nasal cannula devices (flows 1-8 lpm) have also been used in neonatal intensive care units. This study is to evaluate the feasibility of using a pressure limited nasal cannula system instead of a high flow nasal cannula system in the management of premature babies with respiratory distress.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 40
Est. completion date September 2025
Est. primary completion date September 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 23 Weeks to 40 Weeks
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Neonates admitted to NICU - Weights of 400-500 grams - Requiring oxygen greater than 30% - No evidence of focal lobar consolidation in lung fields Exclusion Criteria: - Intolerance to procedure - gelatinous skin - known allergy to adhesive material - interference with therapy - profound sepsis - pneumonia - unmanaged apnea/bradycardia - known or suspect complex congenital heart disease - severe cleft lip or palate - suspect or proven lethal congenital anomaly - intolerance to the interface used in the devices - inability to secure an appropriate fit of the patient nasal interface - considered non-viable or of uncertain viability - parental refusal.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Adaptive Dynamic Inspiratory Nasal Apparatus
Oxygen will be administered via ADINA
High flow Nasal Canula
Oxygen will be administered via nasal canula

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Loma Linda University Medical Center Loma Linda California

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Loma Linda University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (9)

Campbell DM, Shah PS, Shah V, Kelly EN. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure from high flow cannula versus Infant Flow for Preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2006 Sep;26(9):546-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211561. Epub 2006 Jul 13. — View Citation

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Ralstonia associated with Vapotherm oxygen delivery device--United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005 Oct 21;54(41):1052-3. — View Citation

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Update: Ralstonia species associated with Vapotherm oxygen delivery devices--United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005 Nov 4;54(43):1104-5. — View Citation

Dutta S. High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the management of apnea of prematurity. Pediatrics. 2002 Apr;109(4):718-9; author reply 718-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.4.718. No abstract available. — View Citation

Gregory GA, Kitterman JA, Phibbs RH, Tooley WH, Hamilton WK. Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory-distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N Engl J Med. 1971 Jun 17;284(24):1333-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197106172842401. No abstract available. — View Citation

Kubicka ZJ, Limauro J, Darnall RA. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula therapy: yet another way to deliver continuous positive airway pressure? Pediatrics. 2008 Jan;121(1):82-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0957. — View Citation

Shoemaker MT, Pierce MR, Yoder BA, DiGeronimo RJ. High flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for neonatal respiratory disease: a retrospective study. J Perinatol. 2007 Feb;27(2):85-91. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211647. — View Citation

Sreenan C, Lemke RP, Hudson-Mason A, Osiovich H. High-flow nasal cannulae in the management of apnea of prematurity: a comparison with conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatrics. 2001 May;107(5):1081-3. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.5.1081. — View Citation

Woodhead DD, Lambert DK, Clark JM, Christensen RD. Comparing two methods of delivering high-flow gas therapy by nasal cannula following endotracheal extubation: a prospective, randomized, masked, crossover trial. J Perinatol. 2006 Aug;26(8):481-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211543. Epub 2006 May 25. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Duration of Oxygen Use The length of time the patient is on oxygen will be measured in hours. From time of randomization until time of discharge from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) up to 100 days.
Secondary Oxygen Concentration ADINA will provide a concentration of oxygen between 1.5 and 4 liters which is equivalent to that provided by the conventional nasal cannula. This will be measured every twelve hours by NICU staff. From time of randomization until time of discharge from NICU up to 100 days.
Secondary Number of Participants with treatment-related pneumothorax Participants will be monitored for pneumothorax occurrence while on ADINA and/or high flow nasal cannula. The incidence of pneumothorax occurrence in each Arm will be collected for comparison. From time of randomization until time of discharge from NICU up to 100 days.
Secondary Number of Participants with Excoriation at Nasal Site Participants will be monitored for excoriation at the nasal site while on ADINA and/or high flow nasal cannula. The incidence of excoriation at the nasal site in each Arm will be collected for comparison. From time of randomization until time of discharge from NICU up to 100 days.