Respiratory Distress Neonatal — ADINA vs. High Flow Nasal Cannula Comparison Study
Citation(s)
Campbell DM, Shah PS, Shah V, Kelly EN Nasal continuous positive airway pressure from high flow cannula versus Infant Flow for Preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2006 Sep;26(9):546-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211561. Epub 2006 Jul 13.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Update: Ralstonia species associated with Vapotherm oxygen delivery devices--United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005 Nov 4;54(43):1104-5.
Dutta S High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the management of apnea of prematurity. Pediatrics. 2002 Apr;109(4):718-9; author reply 718-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.4.718. No abstract available.
Gregory GA, Kitterman JA, Phibbs RH, Tooley WH, Hamilton WK Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory-distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N Engl J Med. 1971 Jun 17;284(24):1333-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197106172842401. No abstract available.
Kubicka ZJ, Limauro J, Darnall RA Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula therapy: yet another way to deliver continuous positive airway pressure? Pediatrics. 2008 Jan;121(1):82-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0957.
Shoemaker MT, Pierce MR, Yoder BA, DiGeronimo RJ High flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for neonatal respiratory disease: a retrospective study. J Perinatol. 2007 Feb;27(2):85-91. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211647.
Sreenan C, Lemke RP, Hudson-Mason A, Osiovich H High-flow nasal cannulae in the management of apnea of prematurity: a comparison with conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatrics. 2001 May;107(5):1081-3. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.5.1081.
Woodhead DD, Lambert DK, Clark JM, Christensen RD Comparing two methods of delivering high-flow gas therapy by nasal cannula following endotracheal extubation: a prospective, randomized, masked, crossover trial. J Perinatol. 2006 Aug;26(8):481-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211543. Epub 2006 May 25.
Adaptive Dynamic Inspiratory Nasal Apparatus (ADINA): Comparison to High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC)
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
