Residual Aphasia Clinical Trial
— StimRAphOfficial title:
Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex on Language Functions in Residual Aphasia
The present study assesses whether language functions in patients with residual post-stroke aphasia can be improved by transcranial direct current stimulation administered to the primary motor cortex in the language dominant (left) hemisphere.
| Status | Recruiting |
| Enrollment | 16 |
| Est. completion date | April 2014 |
| Est. primary completion date | April 2014 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | Both |
| Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - right handedness - German native speaker - cerebrovascular stroke in left hemisphere (>6 months) - mild aphasia (according to Aachen Aphasia Test Battery Classification, Huber et al., 1983) - residual anomia in naming test (>75 correct responses) Exclusion Criteria: - other current or previous neurological or psychiatric diseases - alcohol or drug abuse - MRI contraindication (e.g. magnetic metal, pacemaker, claustrophobia) |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Basic Science
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | Charite, University Medicine, Dept. of Neurology | Berlin |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Charite University, Berlin, Germany |
Germany,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Response latency during picture naming task (max. 80) | Subjects are assessed in a cross-over design. The primary outcome measure will be assessed twice in each subject, either during placebo ("sham) stimulation or active (anodal) stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation. Order of stimulation will be counterbalanced across the group. | Change in response latency between assessment 1 (week 1) and assessment 2 (week 2), assessments 1 and 2 are seperated by one week | No |
| Secondary | Change in neural activity measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging | Change in fMRI activity between Assessment 1 (week 1) and Assessment 2 (week 2), assessments 1 and 2 are seperated by one week | No |