Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04578795
Other study ID # 9-2020urol
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date September 1, 2020
Est. completion date July 30, 2021

Study information

Verified date October 2020
Source Menoufia University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

To study the Effectiveness of single use flexible Ureteroscopes in treatment of renal stones


Description:

The miniaturization of endourological instruments and improvements in laser lithotripsy have revolutionized the approach to renal stones .

- Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is currently the gold standard for management of large renal calculi.

- PCNL is associated, however, with a higher complication rate, degree of risk, and longer recovery period compared with ureteroscopy - ESWL was introduced in the 1980s and quickly became the gold standard for the treatment of kidney stones . In the 1990s, URS emerged with the advantages of direct visualization and extraction of kidney calculi .

- Currently, the American Urological Association guideline recommends ESWL or URS as equivalent first-line interventions for the treatment of kidney stones < 20 mm . - The guidelines of the European Association of Urology (EAU) additionally distinguish between lower pole and non-lower pole kidney stones. They recommend both treatments as equivalent options for kidney stones of 1020 mm, but favor URS for lower pole stones if adverse factors (such as anatomy and stone composition) argue against ESWL - Flexible URS has become popular with urologists, as it is easy to learn, is associated with high stone-free rates, and is acceptable to patients .

- Firstly described in 1964 by Marshall, the uretroscope was only passively deflectable and did not include working channel. - Although the first successful procedure in humans with a ureteroscope integrating active deflection has been reported by Takayasu, it was not until 1987 that Demetrius Bagley introduced flexible ureteroscopy as we know it today ).

- we can distinguish two types of flexible URS: fiberoptic and digital flexible URS. The difference between them is the image relay and light transmission. - In fiberoptic flexible URS, light and image are transmitted in analog format through fiberoptics bundles whereas illumination in digital scopes is made by fiberoptics or by a diode (DEL) and image capture charged by a digital sensor located at the tip of the endoscope: either charged coupled device (CCD) or complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS ) - In both fiberoptic and digital flexible URS, most manufacturers have models with a 3.6 Fr working channel (for irrigation and use of accessory instruments) and at least one 270° active deflection of the tip. The most recent development in flexible URS was the introduction of single use digital flexible URS .

- On the other hand the traditional reusable scopes have a fixed purchase cost, there is additional cost related to scope processing and repairs . - The cost of single-use flexible URS is defined with the initial purchase price, whereas the procedural cost of reusable flexible URS is dependent on the initial and repair cost, maintenance and scope disinfection and on the number of procedures performed before it needs to be repaired. - There is also the cost of repair and the number of procedures with a refurbished scope until it has to be replaced.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 45
Est. completion date July 30, 2021
Est. primary completion date April 1, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group N/A and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- All cases indicated for flexible in our department (stone kidney up to 2 cm - failed ESWL, difficult PCNL

Exclusion Criteria:

- Staghorn stones

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Single use flexible ureteroscopy (PUSEN-OLIMPUS)
single use flexible ureteroscopy

Locations

Country Name City State
Egypt Hossam abdelruhman kandeel Shibin Al Kawm

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Menoufia University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Clearance of renal stones the effectiveness of single use flexible ureteroscopy in treatment of renal stones in eradicate renal stones One month after operation
Secondary Post operative complications after flexible ureteroscopy Post operative complications as fever , haematuria are common after ureteroscopy 3 months after operation
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT03924596 - Treatment of Renal Stones With Frankincense (Luban) Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT03763539 - Ultraslow Full-power SWL Versus Slow Power-ramping SWL in Stones With High Attenuation Value N/A
Recruiting NCT04367155 - Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid on Blood Loss During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. N/A
Completed NCT02658942 - Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus ESWL in the Management of Lower Calyceal Stones N/A
Completed NCT02645058 - RIRS Versus ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones N/A
Completed NCT06120257 - Management of Lower Pole Renal Hard Stones ≤2 cm N/A
Completed NCT02037906 - Escalating, Constant and Reduction Energy Output in SWL for Renal Stones N/A
Completed NCT05855057 - Effectiveness of US-Guided PCNL Different Positions in Renal Stones Treatment
Recruiting NCT03795532 - Ultraslow SWL Versus Slow SWL for Renal Stones With High Attenuation Value N/A
Completed NCT02373384 - The Predictors of Successful Oral Dissolution Therapy in Radiolucent Renal Stones; A Prospective Evaluation Phase 4
Completed NCT06175910 - Postoperative Outcomes of PCNL vs RIRS in Obese Patients With Pelvic 1.5:3 cm Renal Stones N/A
Completed NCT01619735 - "Dusting" Versus "Basketing" - Treatment Of Intrarenal Stones
Completed NCT04345835 - Prone Flexed Position in Percutanous Nephrolithotomy N/A