On-table Renal Perfusion Evaluation Renal Artery Stenosis or Obstruction

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

1. Evaluate the feasibility for the on-table evaluation of the renal perfusion by using Syngo Dyna Parenchymal Blood Volume(PBV) Body;

2. Explore the clinical benefits of this application during procedure to help the physician to determine the procedure endpoint.

Clinical Trial Description

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is one of the potential manifestations of peripheral artery diseases and it is often observed in patients with evolving renal function impairment and concomitant coronary artery disease, or in those suffering from hypertension refractory to medical therapy.Percutaneous renal artery stenting is an effective therapeutic tool and represents the treatment of choice for RAS. Identification of parameters able to discriminate patients who benefit from RAS stenting, thus, has become of crucial importance if this technique has to survive.

Aortic dissection represents a common cardiovascular disease and it is responsible for the most commonly encountered pathologies in aortic emergency. Renal dysfunction is a common complication associated with aortic dissection, with resultant high mortality rate. The antegrade propagation of the dissection from the proximal aorta to the level of renal arteries and the intervention during surgery may both increase the risk of renal malperfusion; thus, it is important to assess renal function for pre- and post-operative evaluation and guidance for treatment. This can be achieved through perfusion imaging.

Presently, C-arm Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) perfusion is well established, in particular, in the diagnostic assessment of acute stroke and cerebral ischemia. The main novelty of our study lies in the fact that intra-procedural renal perfusion assessed for the first time semiquantitatively by Syngo Dyna Parenchymal Blood Volume(PBV) software, discriminate patients who will benefit from the intervention procedure.

In conclusion, our study suggests that a routine assessment of pre, and post-stenting renal perfusion could help to identify patients at higher risk of no improvement or even worsening of renal function after stenting and, perhaps, more aggressive medical therapy. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT03530748
Study type	Observational
Source	Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
Contact	Zhenyu Shi, PhD
Phone	021 6404 1990
Email	maxshizhenyu@163.com
Status	Recruiting
Phase
Start date	April 9, 2018
Completion date	December 31, 2020

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT05582967` - The DAShED (Diagnosis of Aortic Syndrome in the ED) Study
Terminated	`NCT04116684` - Digital Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Type B Aortic Dissection Patients	N/A
Completed	`NCT02086136` - Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score Plus D-dimer in Suspected Acute Aortic Dissection
Recruiting	`NCT02201589` - Feasibility of Endovascular Repair Of Ascending Aortic Pathologies	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03948555` - Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Aortic Dissection to Visualise Inflammation
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT05912608` - Optimal Strategy for Repair of Type A Acute Aortic Dissection
Recruiting	`NCT03707743` - Registry of Patients With Acute/Subacute Type B Aortic Dissection Treated by Means of the STABILISE Technique (STABILISE)
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT00583817` - Endovascular Treatment of Thoracic Aortic Disease	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05073991` - Incidence of Mortality and Complications After Lung Surgery, Open Thoracic Aortic Repair, TEVAR, EVAR.
Not yet recruiting	`NCT02523300` - Glucocorticoid on the Prognosis of TEVAR	N/A
Completed	`NCT01197651` - Aortic-Stent-Register	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04471909` - NEXUS Aortic Arch Clinical Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06044259` - Study Comparing Hemiarch Replacement and Hemiarch Plus Stent Implantation in Acute Aortic Dissection	N/A
Completed	`NCT05039814` - Prediction of Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Using Cystatin C
Recruiting	`NCT03780738` - A Validation Study of The Relationship Between ALDH2 and Aortic Dissection
Completed	`NCT03647566` - 18F Sodium Fluoride PET/CT in Acute Aortic Syndrome
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT05800743` - Evaluation of the GORE® Ascending Stent Graft	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03347812` - Clinical Study for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Total Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair	N/A
Completed	`NCT05044494` - Surgery for Delay-recognized or Defer-operated Type A Aortic Dissection
Terminated	`NCT02958098` - My Research Legacy Pilot Study

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.