View clinical trials related to Rejection Heart Transplant.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to test if SGLT2 inhibitors could prevent or delay the development of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV) post-heart transplantation (TxC). The main questions it aims to answer are: Primary outcome: CAV, according to ISHLT grading system diagnosed by CCTA; Secondary outcomes: cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, hospitalization, worsening glomerular filtration rate, fasting glucose, weight, and blood pressure. Exploratory and safety outcomes: Rejection, hypoglycemia, urinary tract infection, hypovolemia, and limb amputation. HYPOTHESIS The null hypothesis is that SGLT2 inhibitors do not reduce the incidence of CAV in transplanted patients. The alternative hypothesis is that SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the incidence of CAV in transplanted patients.METHODOLOGY Study Design A randomized clinical trial of superiority with active control (2 arms), with central randomization and blinded evaluation of outcomes, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding dapagliflozin or empagliflozin 10 mg once daily to conventional post-TxC treatment compared with the treatment of isolated conventional post-TxC for 6-8 months. Study Sample Sample: All adult patients undergoing a heart transplant between January 2017 and December 2023 at Hospital de Messejana. Inclusion Criteria Included: Patients of both sexes, aged ≥ 18 years, who have undergone heart transplantation between January 2017 and December 2023 and are under the care of the Heart Transplant and Heart Failure Unit at Hospital de Messejana.
In this a prospective, blinded, collaboration study between pediatric and adult transplant departments. Cardiac MRI data on patient with heart transplantations will be collected during years 2020-2022. Based on sample size calculations, the data has enough power to answer the question, whether MRI can be used as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for detection of acute rejection as such or whether it can be used as fist line noninvasive screening tool for detecting those needing for the more detailed invasive study. A clinical protocol will be developed to optimize the management and outcome of the patients having cardiac transplantation aiming to decrease the number of invasive procedures in these patients.
Cardiac allograft rejection (CAR) occurs in 30% to 40% of transplant recipients within the first year post-transplant, and carries an increased risk of both acute graft failure and reduced graft longevity. Because of the high morbidity of CAR when diagnosed after symptoms develop, surveillance endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) has been included in heart transplantation guidelines since 1990. Although EMB is the established gold standard for the diagnosis of CAR, the clinical utility of EMB using standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) histologic analysis is limited by marked inter-observer variability and significant discordance between the histologic grade and clinical impression of CAR severity. On the other hand, Tacrolimus (TAC), one of the most important immunosuppressant drug and widely used for the prevention of rejection after solid organ transplantation (SOT), is considered a critical dose drug: too low exposure to TAC may result in under-immunosuppression and acute rejection, whereas overexposure puts patients at risk for toxicity. Tac concentrations, in whole-blood, are considered therapeutic when maintained in the range 5 and 20 ng/mL. In addition to being highly variable inter-individually, TAC pharmacokinetics can also be variable within individual patients. Although in recent years significant decrease of rejection post SOT has been observed, there is space for further modulation of immunosuppressive therapy, in order to reduce the most common adverse side effects (nephrotoxicity, diabetes, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, infections and malignancies), to improve the patients quality of life and to better individualize their therapies. Tac. Unfortunately, a clear correlation between TAC whole blood concentration and acute rejection risk has not yet been defined.