Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06460792
Other study ID # p-2024-15805
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date June 4, 2024
Est. completion date June 4, 2029

Study information

Verified date June 2024
Source Nordsjaellands Hospital
Contact Kai Lange, MD
Phone +4548294252
Email kai.henrik.wiborg.lange@regionh.dk
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational [Patient Registry]

Clinical Trial Summary

Peripheral nerve blocks are often used in anaesthesia. They can be used as the only method of anaesthesia during surgery or in combination with other methods, e.g., general anaesthesia and sedation. Moreover, peripheral nerve blocks are used to treat postoperative pain, alleviate pain in trauma patients, and for painful procedures. For a method to be clinically useful, it is essential to understand the factors contributing to high success rates. It is equally important to know the complications related to the method. Finally, it is essential to establish a robust learning system where the anesthesiologists can track their nerve block performance over time and compare it to high performers and general performance. Therefore, we aim to establish a prospective and ongoing database to gain insight into 1) Factors contributing to block quality, e.g., success rate and nerve block duration; 2) Frequencies and types of nerve injuries and bleeding complications associated with the block procedure; 3) Tracking of block performance by anaesthesiologists.


Description:

Introduction Peripheral nerve blocks are often used in anaesthesia. They can be used as the only method of anaesthesia during surgery or in combination with other methods, e.g., general anaesthesia and sedation. Moreover, peripheral nerve blocks are used to treat postoperative pain, alleviate pain in trauma patients, and for painful procedures. For a method to be clinically useful, it is essential to understand the factors contributing to high success rates. It is equally important to know the complications related to the method. Finally, it is essential to establish a robust learning system where the anesthesiologists can track their nerve block performance over time and compare it to high performers and general performance. Therefore, we aim to establish a prospective and ongoing database to gain insight into 1) Factors contributing to block quality, e.g., success rate and nerve block duration; 2) Frequencies and types of nerve injuries and bleeding complications associated with the block procedure; 3) Tracking of block performance by anaesthesiologists. These three points are described in more detail below: 1. Success rate (block quality) It is difficult to get an overview of the success rates of peripheral nerve blocks. Most studies focus on one specific nerve block, and the number of included patients is often low. In addition, the block procedure is performed by a few anaesthesiologists who are highly skilled in the specific procedure. By establishing a database, including the most used peripheral nerve blocks used in different settings, i.e., surgery, perioperative pain management, and painful procedures, and by including anaesthesiologists with varying levels of experience and expertise, it will be possible to get a more detailed picture of factors that are important for achieving high success rates. 2. Complications Nerve injury. Peripheral nerve blocks are generally considered safe to use with low complication rates. However, complications can be severe and result in permanent nerve injury. Therefore, it is essential to get an overview of block-related complications and factors associated with these complications. Different regions have specific characteristics, and complications probably follow a characteristic pattern. A database with sufficient data will allow us to detail essential factors for understanding how complications develop and turn into permanent injuries. Bleeding. Today, many patients receive anticoagulant therapy. We will, therefore, collect data on bleeding complications associated with the block procedure. 3. Learning Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks require a certain amount of skill to deposit LA in the correct place. By gathering data on block quality from individual anaesthesiologists over time it will be possible to gain insight into learning curves and factors important for learning different block procedures. Methods Study design: Observational prospective cohort study. Setting: Initially, a single-centre study at the Department of Anaesthesiology, North Zealand Hospital. We envision to include as many centres as possible in Denmark. Participants: Patients scheduled for peripheral nerve blocks. Prior to collecting follow-up data, informed consent will be obtained from each participant through an automated and secure sms system. Variables: The following variables are registered: Patient demographics: Social security number, age, sex, height, weight, comorbidity (diabetes, use of insulin, chronic pain, pain medication, anticoagulant medication), ASA status, and type of surgery performed. Technical block data: Date and time for the peripheral nerve block, performing anaesthesiologist, block details (name of block, type of LA, volume of LA, concentration of LA, anatomical location of LA injection, adjuvants used, onset time). Peripheral nerve block quality and success rate: success rate, need of supplementary blocks, use of tourniquet, reasons for block deemed unsuccessful. Bleeding complications: details on bleeding complications associated with the block procedure. Follow-up by surveys: Day 1: duration of peripheral nerve block, pain after block termination. Day 2: measures if block duration > 24 h. Day 30: signs of nerve injury: altered sensation, pain, decreased muscle force. Day 90: continuous signs of nerve injury: altered sensation, pain, decreased muscle force. Day 365: continuous signs of nerve injury: altered sensation, pain, decreased muscle force. Data sources/measurements: All variables are part of data that are normally registered for patients who have a peripheral nerve block. However, the purpose of establishing the database is to perform a systematic data capture. We will use the secure web application for online research databases, REDCap to enter data through electronic CRFs and through surveys sent to the patients (follow-up). Study size: The purpose of establishing the database is to continuously register peripheral nerve blocks in patients. As such there is no pre-defined study size. Statistical methods: We will use descriptive statistics and inferential statistical analyses, e.g., regression analyses, etc.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 5000
Est. completion date June 4, 2029
Est. primary completion date June 4, 2029
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 2 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - age > 2 years Exclusion Criteria - Infection at puncture site - Allergy to local anesthetics - Unable to understand given oral instruction

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block
Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks. Registration of quality, complications and learning as detailed in the description

Locations

Country Name City State
Denmark Dept of Anesthesiology, Nordsjællands Hospital Hillerød

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Nordsjaellands Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Denmark, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Block Success Clinical evaluation of nerve function 2 hours
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05944393 - Erector Spine Plane (ESP) Block for Analgesia in Pediatric Scoliosis Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT05589246 - Regional Analgesia in Combination With Cryoanalgesia to Prevent Acute Pain Following Nuss Procedure N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03978780 - Erector Spinae Block vs. Placebo Block Study N/A
Terminated NCT02846610 - Registry for Acute Pain Treatment
Completed NCT03679897 - Comparison of 0.375% Ropivacaine and 0.25% Levobupivacaine for Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06014749 - Serratus Intercostal Block Versus Epidural Analgesia in Eventration: Prospective Observational Study
Completed NCT04438369 - Evaluation of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laprascopic Ventral Hernia Repair. N/A
Terminated NCT03500744 - Erector Spinae Plane Block for Major Gynecologic and Urologic Surgery N/A
Completed NCT05160298 - Analgesic Effect of Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block With Ropivacaine After Sternotomy for Cardiac Surgery Phase 2
Recruiting NCT06121726 - Predictive Factors for the Effectiveness of the Ilioinguinal Iliohypogastric Nerve Block for Hernia Surgery
Completed NCT04549090 - Ultrasound Guided Posterior Quadratus Lumborum Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Gynecologic Surgery
Completed NCT05286190 - Caudal Block and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT02200016 - Displacement of Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Catheters After Major Foot and Ankle Surgery Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06089798 - Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Pecto-intercostal Plane Block in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
Not yet recruiting NCT06115720 - Consent in Anaesthesia N/A
Completed NCT04668183 - Ultrasound-guided PNB and DPNB for Pediatric Distal Hypospadias Surgery
Completed NCT05344105 - Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Transversalis Fascia Plan Block and Erector Spina Plan Block N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06313294 - Postoperative Follow-up Via Text Messages Automated Versus Telephone in Patients With Continuous Regional Anesthesia N/A
Completed NCT02950558 - Anesthesia for Pain After Ankle Fracture Surgery Phase 4
Completed NCT05351151 - Pain Reduction in Maxillomandibular Surgery Using Maxillary and Mandibular Nerve Blocks N/A