Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

In the last 10 years, severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) was responsible of multiple outbreaks putting a strain on the public health worldwide. Indeed, SARI had a relevant role in the development of pandemic and epidemic with terrible consequences such as the 2009 H1N1 pandemic which led to more than 200.000 respiratory deaths globally. In late December 2019, in Wuhan, Hubei, China, a new respiratory syndrome emerged with clinical signs of viral pneumonia and person-to-person transmission. Tests showed the appearance of a novel coronavirus, namely the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Two other strains, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) have caused severe respiratory illnesses, sometimes fatal. In particular, the mortality rate associated with SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, was of 10% and 37% respectively. Even though COVID-19 appeared from the first time in China, quickly it spread worldwide and cases have been described in other countries such as Thailand, Japan, South Korea, Germany, Italy, France, Iran, USA and many other countries. An early paper reported 41 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection in Wuhan. The median age of the patients was 49 years and mostly men (73%). Among those, 32% were admitted to the ICU because of the severe hypoxemia. The most associated comorbidities were diabetes (20%), hypertension (15%), and cardiovascular diseases (15%). On admission, 98% of the patients had bilateral multiple lobular and sub-segmental areas of consolidation. Importantly, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) developed in 29% of the patients, while acute cardiac injury in 12%, and secondary infection in 10%. Invasive mechanical ventilation was required in 10% of those patients, and two of these patients (5%) had refractory hypoxemia and received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). In a later retrospective report by Wang and collaborators, clinical characteristics of 138 patients with COVID-19 infection were described. ICU admission was required in 26.1% of the patients for acute respiratory distress syndrome (61.1%), arrhythmia (44.4%), and shock (30.6%). ECMO support was needed in 11% of the patients admitted to the ICU. During the period of follow-up, overall mortality was 4.3%. The use of ECMO in COVID-19 infection is increasing due to the high transmission rate of the infection and the respiratory-related mortality. Therefore, the investigators believe that ECMO in case of severe interstitial pneumonia caused by COVID could represent a valid solution in order to avoid lung injuries related to prolonged treatment with non-invasive and invasive mechanical ventilation. In addition, ECMO could have a role for the systemic complications such as septic and cardiogenic shock as well myocarditis scenarios. Potential clinical effects and outcomes of the ECMO support in the novel coronavirus pandemic will be recorded and analyzed in our project. The researchers hypothesize that a significant percentage of patients with COVID-19 infection will require the utilize of ECMO for refactory hypoxemia, cardiogenic shock or septic shock. This study seeks to prove this hypothesis by conducting an observational retrospective/prospective study of patients in the ICU who underwent ECMO support and describe clinical features, severity of pulmonary dysfunction and risk factors of COVID-patients who need ECMO support, the incidence of ECMO use, ECMO technical characteristics, duration of ECMO, complications and outcomes of COVID-patients requiring ECMO support.


Clinical Trial Description

n/a


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04366921
Study type Observational
Source Maastricht University Medical Center
Contact Lorusso, Prof. Dr.
Phone + 31(0) 433877095
Email roberto.lorussobs@gmail.com
Status Recruiting
Phase
Start date April 10, 2020
Completion date April 2022

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT03649633 - Vitamin C, Steroids, and Thiamine, and Cerebral Autoregulation and Functional Outcome in Septic Shock Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT04117568 - The Role of Emergency Neutrophils and Glycans in Postoperative and Septic Patients
Completed NCT04227652 - Control of Fever in Septic Patients N/A
Completed NCT05629780 - Temporal Changes of Lactate in CLASSIC Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT04796636 - High-dose Intravenous Vitamin C in Patients With Septic Shock Phase 1
Terminated NCT03335124 - The Effect of Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone on Clinical Course and Outcome in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04005001 - Machine Learning Sepsis Alert Notification Using Clinical Data Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05217836 - Iron Metabolism Disorders in Patients With Sepsis or Septic Shock.
Recruiting NCT05066256 - LV Diastolic Function vs IVC Diameter Variation as Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness in Shock N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05443854 - Impact of Aminoglycosides-based Antibiotics Combination and Protective Isolation on Outcomes in Critically-ill Neutropenic Patients With Sepsis: (Combination-Lock01) Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT04516395 - Optimizing Antibiotic Dosing Regimens for the Treatment of Infection Caused by Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae N/A
Recruiting NCT02899143 - Short-course Antimicrobial Therapy in Sepsis Phase 2
Recruiting NCT02580240 - Administration of Hydrocortisone for the Treatment of Septic Shock N/A
Recruiting NCT02676427 - Fluid Responsiveness in Septic Shock Evaluated by Caval Ultrasound Doppler Examination
Recruiting NCT02565251 - Volemic Resuscitation in Sepsis and Septic Shock N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02547467 - TOADS Study: TO Assess Death From Septic Shock. N/A
Terminated NCT02335723 - ASSET - a Double-Blind, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Investigation With Alteco® LPS Adsorber N/A
Completed NCT02638545 - Hemodynamic Effects of Dexmedetomidine in Septic Shock Phase 3
Completed NCT02306928 - PK Analysis of Piperacillin in Septic Shock Patients N/A
Completed NCT02079402 - Conservative vs. Liberal Approach to Fluid Therapy of Septic Shock in Intensive Care Phase 4