View clinical trials related to Refractive Errors.
Filter by:This cohort study aimed to assess the change of refractive status in Chinese school children.
To determine if the intraocular pseudophakic contact lens (IOPCL), referred to as the AccuraSee, corrects residual refractive errors after cataract surgery using a plus powered lens in subjects with ocular pathology previously implanted with a Bausch and Lomb LI61AO or LI61SE monofocal posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) and to confirm its positional stability and adherence relative to the PCIOL.
Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) live with visual deficits due, in part, to elevated levels of higher-order optical aberrations (HOA). HOAs are distortions/abnormalities in the structure of the refractive components of the eye (i.e. the cornea and the lens) that, if present, can result in poor quality focus on the retina, thus negatively impacting vision. HOAs in the general population are overall low, and thus not ordinarily considered during the eye examination and determination of refractive correction. However, for some populations, such as individuals with DS, HOAs are elevated, and thus the commonly used clinical techniques to determine refractive corrections may fall short. The most common clinical technique for refractive correction determination is subjective refraction whereby a clinician asks the patient to compare different lens options and select the lens that provides the best visual outcome. Given the cognitive demands of the standard subjective refraction technique, clinicians rely on objective clinical techniques to prescribe optical corrections for individuals with DS. This is problematic, because it may result in errors for eyes with elevated HOA given that these techniques do not include measurement of the HOAs. The proposed research evaluates the use of objective wavefront measurements that quantify the HOAs of the eye as a basis for refractive correction determination for patients with DS. The specific aim is to determine whether dilation of the eyes is needed prior to objective wavefront measurements. Dilation of the eyes increases the ability to measure the optical quality of the eye and paralyzes accommodation (the natural focusing mechanism of the eye), which could be beneficial in determining refractions. However, the use of dilation lengthens the process for determining prescriptions and may be less desirable for patients.
The overall objective of this clinical study is to describe the clinical performance of the TOTAL30® soft contact lens compared to the ACUVUE® OASYS® with HYDRACLEAR PLUS (AOHP) soft contact lens in a daily wear modality.
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical performance of LID018869 soft contact with ACUVUE® OASYS with HYDRACLEAR® PLUS (AOHP) soft contact lenses over 30 days of daily wear.
This study evaluates the reliability, validity and safety of a self administered, subjective refraction test via a mobile medical app (GoEyes) as compared to standard of care subjective manifest refraction performed by a health care provider, in subjects who have no known ocular disease or condition other than refractive error.
The purpose of this study to evaluate the overall performance of PRECISION1™ for Astigmatism contact lenses with MyDay® Toric contact lenses.
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical performance of DAILIES TOTAL1 ( DT1) contact lenses with Infuse contact lenses.
This study will investigate efficacy and safety of astaxanthin in 180 volunteers with refraction errors. Visual test, skin test, liver function test, renal function test, and adverse event will be evaluated before and after taking astaxanthin for 1 and 2 months.
The study will compare the short-term clinical performance and wearer and practitioner acceptability of a new-to-market spherical daily disposable (DD) hydrogel soft contact lens to a currently marketed spherical DD hydrogel soft contact lens.