View clinical trials related to Refractive Errors.
Filter by:The study will compare the short-term clinical performance and wearer and practitioner acceptability of a new-to-market spherical daily disposable (DD) hydrogel soft contact lens to a currently marketed spherical DD hydrogel soft contact lens.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the overall performance of PRECISION1™ contact lenses when compared to INFUSE™ contact lenses.
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical performance of PRECISION1™ for Astigmatism (P1fA) contact lenses with 1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST® for ASTIGMATISM (AMfA) contact lenses.
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical performance of PRECISION1™ contact lenses to Clariti® 1 day contact lenses.
The investigator want to determine the refractive status of 80 children with disabilities and of 81 healthy children from a witness group. The vitamin D level of the children will be dosed for making different correlations with visual acuity status.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate corneal staining observed after 2 hours of wear with an investigational contact lens against both PureVision contact lenses pre-cycled with Biotrue and Biofinity contact lenses pre-cycled with RepleniSH.
To evaluate the refractive outcomes of cataract surgery in PEX syndrome and determine which of the commonly used IOL formulas (SRK/T, Barrett Universal II and Hill-RBF) is the best in predicting postoperative refractive outcomes in PEX.
We aimed o compare the refractive changes associated with pars plana vitrectomy with or without intraocular gas tamponade in pseudophakic eyes. This retrospective study included pseudophakic patients with Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy who underwent 23G PPV between February 2015 and March 2019. Group 1 consisted of patients with regmatogenous RD who underwent PPV and 12% perflouropropane (C3F8) gas tamponade whereas Group 2 consisted of patients who underwent PPV for epiretinal membrane or vitreous hemorrhage (VH). No tamponade was used in Group 2. Minimum follow-up was 12 months.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the overall clinical performance of an investigational silicone hydrogel contact lens over 7 days of daily wear.
This is a prospective, comparative, randomized, controlled, single-blind, single-surgeon, single-center PMCF clinical study whereby participants undergoing refractive surgery for correction of ametropia will receive a transepithelial PRK (tPRK) and conventional PRK treatment in the contralateral eye. To avoid bias in the clinical outcomes, the two PRK treatment options are randomized to the eyes of the patients based on ocular dominance. In addition, a 1:1 randomization is applied within the tPRK group to eyes with and without end-treatment laser polishing. Both procedures, standard PRK and tPRK, are performed in a one-step procedure. The main difference between the procedures is, that in conventional PRK, the epithelium will be removed using alcohol, whereas in tPRK procedures, the epithelium will be removed by laser ablation.