View clinical trials related to Refractive Errors.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to assess long term performance and safety of verofilcon A soft contact lenses in a real-world setting in a population of 7 years or older having at least 1 year of verofilcon A (sphere or toric) contact lens wear in a daily wear and daily disposable modality.
When a child does not meet developmental milestones at the anticipated times, it is referred to as having a developmental delay. These benchmarks cover social, emotional, cognitive, physical, and communication abilities. Developmental delays can result from a number of factors, including genetic circumstances, early delivery, specific medical issues, or external variables. Although they mainly impair vision, refractive errors are unrelated to developmental delays. Because vision facilitates interaction with the environment, it is vital to a child's development. Early detection of uncorrected refractive defects and related vision loss in children can pose a challenge. To ascertain whether an increase is suitable and successful, a thorough evaluation of the child's readiness and the application of pertinent measurement techniques may be necessary. An analysis looks into Randomized Controlled Trial will be the type of study design used. There will be two groups of conveniently randomized sample size of thirty-two. The data analysis will be done using SPSS version 22.0. To verify normality, the Shapiro-Wilk test will be employed. The study will be carried out in the department of physical therapy of the rising sun and the Lahore rehab facility. The study will be finished six months from the time the synopsis is approved. A sample size of thirty-two was determined using the OPENEPI tool. The VQOL/item Tool and pediatric manual muscle testing will be used. For four weeks, the control group will receive standard physical therapy care. Group B: Experimental Group: For five weeks, a traditional physical therapy regimen and Powerball exercises will be administered.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the postoperative visual acuity curves of patients that underwent one of the following surgical procedures: Insertion of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens with digital assistance and insertion of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens without digital assistance.
The purpose of this Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF) study is to continuously assess the visual performance and safety of TOTAL30 Sphere and TOTAL30 for Astigmatism contact lenses in a real-world setting across a broad variety of patients through routine clinical practices.
The aim of this study is to compare the short-term clinical performance of two sphere contact lenses.
A refractive surprise can be defined as the failure to achieve the intended postoperative refractive target or the presentation of unexpected and, unwanted post-operative refractive error. It can cause anisometropia or dominance switch and is a source of patient dissatisfaction due to unmet expectations.The best way to manage refractive surprise is to prevent it. The 2017 NICE guidelines on the management of cataracts provide advice on prevention of refractive surprise through accurate biometry, A-constant optimisation, intraocular lens (IOL) formula selection and avoiding wrong lens implant errors.Benchmark standards for NHS cataract surgery dictate that 85% of eyes should be within 1 dioptre (D) and 55% within 0.5D of target spherical equivalent refraction following surgery.
The goal of this observational study is to test whether surgeries for lenses designed to be implanted in the eye to correct refractive error can be done without the need for using viscoelastic substances that are used routinely nowadays to make it easier to introduce them inside the human eye and protect the inside of the eye during the operation. The main question it aims to answer is that is it safe to do the surgery without using them? to answer this question researchers will access recorded data of patients that underwent refractive surgeries in a private clinic since 2017 and compare them as two groups: those who underwent the traditional procedures and those who had it without the use of dispersive viscoelastics in regard to their vision before and after surgery, their ocular pressure and biomicroscopic analysis of the inside of their corneas before and after surgery.
Purpose: Numerous studies have proven that emmetropization in young animals including humans is regulated by visual input. It has long been hypothesized that peripheral myopic defocus may act as a stop signal to reduce myopia progression and axial elongation. As such, multifocal soft contact lenses (MFCLs) have been utilized for myopia control in school-aged children, with variable efficacies. One potential explanation is that the actual peripheral myopic defocus an eye experiences during MFCL wear may not be identical to the Add power and not sufficient to reduce myopia progression. Our study investigated and compared the peripheral power profiles of myopic eyes when they were uncorrected and wore single vision contact lenses (SVCLs) and MFCLs of different Add powers. Methods: Subjects with -1.00 D to -10.00 D of myopia (SE, determined with manifest refraction) were custom fit with both single vision (SV) and MFCLs (+2.00 and +4.00 D Add; provided by Specialeyes) in both eyes. These Specialeyes MFCLs had an aspheric design with a standard total optical zone of 8.0mm. Cycloplegic central autorefraction was conducted with both Grand Seiko WAM-5500 open-field auto-refractor (Grand Seiko Co Ltd) and OPD OPD-Scan III Wavefront Aberrometer (Marco) on the subjects in the following conditions: (1) no CLs, (2) SVCLs, (3) MFCLs (+2.00D Add), and (4) MFCLs (+4.00D Add). Relative peripheral power profiles were measured using the OPD under the same 4 conditions after cycloplegia. Data in the right eye was used for analysis.
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Bausch + Lomb Myopia Control Lens for the Correction of Myopic Ametropia and Slowing the Progression of Myopia in Children
The objective is to compare the refractive parameters of the photorefraction prototype device without cycloplegia with the refractive parameters of reference device, an autorefractometer with and without cycloplegia.