Reducing Cough During Extubation Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of Effectiveness Between the Combination of Lidocaine Sprayed at Laryngeal Inlet and on the Cuff of Endotracheal Tube Versus Intravenous Lidocaine for Reducing Cough During Extubation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Verified date | September 2019 |
Source | Khon Kaen University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Coughing during extubation of endotracheal tube (ETT) is a common problem that leads to poor surgical results including hemodynamic change, rebleeding at the surgical wound and wound dehiscence. Recently, lidocaine has been introduced for reducing coughing during extubation. However, data comparing routes of lidocaine application are lacking, thus, this study compared the combination of lidocaine sprayed on laryngeal inlet and cuff of ETT versus intravenous lidocaine injection for efficacy in reducing coughing
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 164 |
Est. completion date | June 30, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | June 30, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 19 Years to 60 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - patients who underwent elective surgery with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classifications of I and III Exclusion Criteria: - patients having body mass index more than 35 kg/m2, high risk of aspiration, chronic smokers more than ten pack-years, chronic cough or recent upper respiratory infection, suspected difficult airway, retained ETT prior surgery, surgery at oral cavity, neck and thoracic region, operative time more than 120 minutes or less than 30 minutes, and history of lidocaine allergy |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Thailand | Khon Kaen University | Khon Kaen |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Khon Kaen University |
Thailand,
D'Aragon F, Beaudet N, Gagnon V, Martin R, Sansoucy Y. The effects of lidocaine spray and intracuff alkalinized lidocaine on the occurrence of cough at extubation: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2013 Apr;60(4):370-6. doi: 10.10 — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in incidence of coughing | Coughing event was recorded by blinded anesthesiologist | the incidence was recorded during extubation and immediatly extubation | |
Secondary | Severity of coughing | the severity of cough was recorded by blinded anesthesiologist. Coughing level severity (16) was evaluated as 0 = no cough; 1 = slight cough, cough without obvious contraction of abdomen; 2 = moderate cough, strong and sudden contraction of the abdomen lasting less than 5 seconds; 3 = severe cough, strong and sudden contraction of the abdomen sustained more than 5 seconds | the severity was recorded during extubation and immediatly extubation | |
Secondary | Incidence of postoperative sore throat | Incidence of postoperative sore throat was recorded by two blinded anesthetist nurses . The numeric rating scale (0 = no, 10 = extreme) was used for evaluation of sore throat. If the numeric rating scale was more than 3, it was considered as a significant adverse event. | the incidence was recorded within 24 hr after extubation | |
Secondary | Incidence of dysphonia | Incidence of dysphonia was recorded by two blinded anesthetist nurses . | the incidence was recorded within 24 hr after extubation | |
Secondary | Incidence of dysphagia | Incidence of dysphagia was recorded by two blinded anesthetist nurses . | the incidence was recorded within 24 hr after extubation |