View clinical trials related to Rectal Neoplasms.
Filter by:Anastomotic leakage is one of the most serious postoperative complications of low rectal cancer, with an incidence of 3%-21%. The occurrence of anastomotic leakage is related to many factors, and the occurrence of anastomotic leakage can be predicted by building a prediction model. Most of the anastomotic leakage prediction models constructed in the past are nomograms, which have limitations in the fitting of model creation. In the previous study, the center took the lead in building a random forest anastomotic leakage prediction model based on machine learning. This study intends to prospectively enroll patients with rectal cancer undergoing anterior abdominal resection and use their clinical data to prospectively verify the efficacy of the anastomotic leakage prediction model, and further improve and promote the prediction model.
This study investigates the ability of tumor budding to identify prognosis in different MMR states and different levels of tumor lymphocyte infiltration. Tumor budding is usually defined as an isolated single cancer cell or a cluster of up to four cancer cells located at the front of an infiltrating tumor.
This phase II trial compares the effect of irinotecan versus oxaliplatin after long-course chemoradiation in patients with stage II-III rectal cancer. Combination chemotherapy drugs, such as FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, irinotecan, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin), FOLFOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan ), and CAPOX (capecitabin and oxaliplatin) work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. FOLFOX or CAPOX are used after chemoradiation as usual treatment for rectal cancer. Giving FOLFIRINOX after chemoradiation may increase the response rate and lead to higher rates of clinical complete response (with a chance of avoiding surgery) compared to FOLFOX or CAPOX after chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
This study investigates whether risk criteria based on MRI features could identify a cohort of patients with a good prognosis among those recommended for preoperative treatment by NCCN guidelines to avoid preoperative treatment with the likely good survival outcomes by primary surgery and more accurately indicate the response to the treatment and predict prognosis after neoadjuvant treatmen than radiographic TNM staging in the patients who received neoadjuvant therapy.
This is a retrospective cohort study that aims to evaluate the correlation of magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) and pathological TRG (pTRG) of locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant long course chemoradiotherapy as well as the prognostic value of mrTRG on survival.
Rectal cancer still remains one of the most popular tumors, however, distance metastasis still remains as high as 30% and the long-term survival outcomes are still unsatisfying. The recent conception of total neoadjuvant therapy and immune therapy is becoming popular and the oncologic effects are encouraging, especially in terms of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), the prognostic value of ctDNA has been demonstrated by our prior study. This study will carry out accurate ctDNA-guided neoadjuvant therapy on the basis of previous studies of the research group, and give appropriate treatment plans and treatment intensity to patients with different disease degrees. At the same time, combined with the latest progress in clinical diagnosis and treatment, the potential beneficiaries of immunotherapy were screened scientifically, and the combined immunotherapy was implemented accordingly.
The combination of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME) is considered the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer in the western world. Appropriate preoperative treatment and margin free surgery are key-elements in reducing the local-recurrence of the tumor and consequently improving overall survival. Nevertheless, the local recurrence of stage II and III rectal cancer is still high, with current levels of 5% to 10% even when R0 resection is achieved. Most of the cases of loco-regional recurrence are associated with lateral lymph nodes (LLN) spread of cancer cells, which is not always controlled by the preoperative chemotherapy. As a matter of fact, the incidence of LLD metastases has been estimated to range from 11% to 22% in patients with T3/4 rectal cancer below the peritoneal reflection. In order to improve these poor outcomes, Japanese surgeons have adopted extended lymphadenectomy with the dissection of lateral extramesorectal lymph nodes as the standard of care for T2-3 low rectal cancer patients5. While this approach is widely used in Japan and Korea, western surgeons have preferred a less aggressive approach, indicating lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) only in presence of clinically highly suspicious lateral pelvic lymph nodes on baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thus, it is essential to identify preoperative predictive factors of LLN metastasis. Even if MRI is considered the optimal diagnostic tool in rectal cancer, its accuracy for LLN staging is considered poor, especially after neoadjuvant treatment. LLNs often change in both features and size after CRT, and this behaviour might not be in concordance with the response of the primary tumor. To the best of our knowledge, no consensus exists on whether the risk of local recurrence should be determined by assessing the features of LLN on the primary MRI or on the restaging MRI. Moreover, the relation between LLN response and primary tumor regression grade after neoadjuvant CRT needs to be thoroughly explored. This multicenter cohort study aimed to investigate factors on primary and restaging MRI associated with lateral nodal recurrence and to identify patients who may benefit from LLND after neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer.
The management of rectal cancers has changed over the past decades towards a multidisciplinary strategy, combining radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery. Local recurrence rates, dropped to less than 6 % with pre-operative radiotherapy and the standardization of total mesorectal excision (TME), at the price of increased peri-operative morbidity and functional sequelae. Since neoadjuvant treatment achieves up to 30 % complete response, organ preservation has been increasingly debated for good responders. With the introduction of better-quality imaging for tumour visualization and treatment planning, a new targeted radiation treatment was introduced with high dose rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDRBT), developped by Dr Te Vuong's team in Montreal. This treatment allows for radiotherapy dose escalation to increase the complete response rate, and subsequently the rate of patients amenable to rectal preservation. This phase 2 trial study is proposed to assess the feasibility of HDR brachytherapy after standard chemoradiotherapy among patients selected for rectal preservation.
The goal of this phase 2 study is to learn about the efficacy and safety of short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) sequential Penpulimab in combination with CAPEOX in the neoadjuvant treatment of microsatellite stable (MSS) locally advanced rectal cancer. The main question it aims to answer is the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the neoadjuvant treatment of MSS rectal cancer. Participants will receive neoadjuvant treatment of SCRT sequential Penpulimab in combination with CAPEOX. Participants will undergo a clinical re-staging assessment at the end of neoadjuvant therapy to determine whether to adopt a watch-and-wait strategy or undergo radical surgery.
The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib combined with mFOLFOX6 + synchronous radiotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy in middle and low locally advanced rectal cancer patients with no previous anti-tumor treatment.