Clinical Trials Logo

Rectal Cancer Surgery clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Rectal Cancer Surgery.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06033794 Recruiting - Indocyanine Green Clinical Trials

Applications of Fluorescence Imaging Guided Lymph Node Dissection and Fluorescence Angiography of Inferior Mesenteric Artery Assisted Left Colic Artery Preservation

Start date: May 1, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To investigate the accuracy of fluorescence angiography technique IMA classification and the impact of lymph node mapping technique on the dissection of No. 253 lymph nodes.

NCT ID: NCT03491540 Completed - Clinical trials for Rectal Cancer Surgery

Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Oral Antibiotics Before Rectal Cancer Surgery

PREPACOL2
Start date: September 3, 2018
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This study aims to demonstrate that a preoperative combination of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics, before elective laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery, is associated with a reduction of postoperative surgical site infection rate, as compared to mechanical bowel preparation alone Our hypothesis is that a preoperative colonic preparation including a combination of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics before elective laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery is associated with a reduced rate of 30-day postoperative surgical site infection, as compared to mechanical bowel preparation alone

NCT ID: NCT01269567 Completed - Clinical trials for Randomized Clinical Trial

Drainage After Rectal Excision for Rectal Cancer

GRECCAR 5
Start date: January 2011
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

After rectal excision, the rate of anastomotic leak and abscess is higher than after colic surgery. In order to limit and avoid the risk of pelvic sepsis after rectal excision, a prophylactic pelvic drainage is usually used. If current data have confirmed the uselessness of drainage in colic surgery, the question stay in abeyance in rectal surgery. This practice had never been evaluated in patients with rectal excision and low anastomosis (patients with a high risk of pelvic sepsis)