View clinical trials related to Rectal Cancer Stage I.
Filter by:Introduction: The standard treatment for rectal adenocarcinoma is total mesorectal excision (TME), a technique involving resection of the rectum, with or without a temporary or permanent stoma. TME is associated with high morbidity and genitourinary alterations. On the other hand, transanal endoscopic surgery (TEM) allows access to tumors up to 20 cm from the anal margin, with much lower postoperative morbidity and without the need for ostomy. For T1, N0, M0 rectal adenocarcinomas without poor prognostic factors, TEM is the technique of choice. However, recent studies have described local recurrences of up to 20%. Our group, TAUTEM, has just completed a phase III clinical trial in T2-T3ab, N0, M0 rectal cancer, comparing preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and TEM versus TME, with very positive results in terms of postoperative morbidity, quality of life, and a local recurrence rate of 7.4%, not inferior to TME. These results encourage our TAUTEM group to launch a similar project at the T1, N0, M0 stage, comparing standard TEM treatment versus QRT and TEM, aiming to improve rectal preservation outcomes and enhance results regarding local recurrence, distant recurrence, and oncologic survival. Method: Prospective, controlled, randomized phase III multicenter clinical trial. Patients with rectal adenocarcinoma within 10 cm of the anal margin and up to 4 cm in size, staged as T1, N0, M0, will be included. These patients will be randomized into two groups: TEM after CRT and TEM alone. Postoperative morbidity and mortality, CRT side effects, and quality of life will be recorded. The minimum follow-up will evaluate rectal preservation and local recurrence and survival at two and three years. The sample size calculation for the study will be 106 patients. Conclusions: The aim of the study is to improve oncological outcomes in stage T1, N0, M0 rectal cancer through preoperative chemoradiotherapy associated with local surgery (TEM).
BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer is the sixth most common neoplasm in Spain. In the early stages (pT1-N0), the treatment of choice is transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Treatment may be expanded to radical surgery if there are poor prognostic factors for the presence of metastatic lymph nodes and a risk of recurrence (up to 29%). The most determining histopathological factor is the degree of submucosal invasion. There are different classical classifications to assess this invasion, which pose difficulties in establishing objective and reproducible measurements. Casalots et al. propose a new classification (Taulí-T1) based on the measurement of residual healthy submucosa (hrSB), hypothesizing that a greater amount of healthy submucosa correlates with a better prognosis. Results show less healthy submucosa in the recurrence group, with a trend towards statistical significance (p=0.09). OBJECTIVE: To compare the Taulí-T1 classification with conventional quantitative classifications (Kitajima, Ueno) and qualitative classifications (sm1, sm2, and sm3 by Kudo and Kikuchi). METHODOLOGY: A multicenter observational retrospective cohort study comparing the Taulí-T1 classification with classical classifications in 317 patients with stage pT1 rectal adenocarcinoma, following the STROBE guidelines. The main variable is the measurement of tumor invasion in µm through hrSB, compared to the invasion of quantitative (Kitajima and Ueno) and qualitative (Kudo and Kikuchi) classical classifications. Concordance will be assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient for quantitative variables and Cohen's weighted kappa for qualitative variables, with a 95% confidence interval and p<0.005.
ERUS-3D and CMI demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy in parietal staging of rectal extraperitoneal neoplasms, however with greater efficiency of the endoscopic method. The association of studies can improve diagnostic efficacy and influence the most appropriate approach.
Open-label, Phase I-II, first-in-human (FIH) study for A166 monotherapy in HER2-expressing or amplified patients who progressed on or did not respond to available standard therapies. Patients must have documented HER2 expression or amplification. The patient must have exhausted available standard therapies. Patients will receive study drug as a single IV infusion. Cycles will continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Erectile dysfunction will be explored by recording R / P and self-administered questionnaire IIEF-5.