View clinical trials related to Radical Prostatectomy.
Filter by:Radical prostatectomy is a common treatment for localized prostate cancer. More than 30% of men who undergo surgery will subsequently develop recurrence, particularly in patients with adverse features where the risk may be even higher. Recurrence typically manifests as a rise in serum-level of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), referred to as biochemical recurrence. Post-operative radiotherapy is a potentially curative option for many patients, as shown in multiple prior randomized studies. A standard course of post-operative radiation requires 6 to 6 and half weeks of treatment, 5 days a week; however, new high-precision radiation techniques with image guidance, termed stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), can deliver an equivalent or higher dose of treatment in 5 visits. Our group, amongst others, have demonstrated in previous studies, that the new 5-treatment technique was safe, convenient and effective in patients with intact prostates. Currently, limited data exists on this approach after prostatectomy. This study will be one of the first to assess the side effect profile and efficacy of SBRT in patients with localized prostate cancer who are considered candidates for post-prostatectomy radiation.
The purpose of this project is to assess the relationship between low intensity shock wave treatment (LI-SWT) and erectile function (ED) in patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy (RP).
Prostate cancer is the commonest cancer form in men in Northern Europe. Management of the cancer often includes surgical removal of the primary tumor. In the last 5-10 years, robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has become common. Good pain relief is central to early mobilization and greater patient satisfaction. Randomized controlled studies on pain relief following RALP are few and the role of spinal analgesia in pain management following robotic surgery has not been described. Techniques available for pain relief following RALP include spinal anesthesia with or without opiates, intravenous analgesia with morphine or a multimodal pain management technique using a combination of several analgesics. Spinal anesthesia and analgesia reduces the surgical stress and inflammatory response following laparoscopic colorectal surgery and may offer similar benefit even during RALP. Early perioperative complications may cause postoperative morbidity following robotic surgery, and sometimes delay home discharge. Since all robotic operations in the pelvic region are performed in a deep Trendelenberg position, this can even have negative consequences for the heart, brain and the lungs. Cardiac complications in the form of minimal cardiac injury or mild heart failure have not been previously studied following RALP. Additionally, patients are sometimes delirious in the early postoperative period following RALP. The precise cause for this remains unclear and may be related to pain, cognitive dysfunction or an urge to pass urine despite a urinary catheter. In addition to good postoperative pain relief, early postoperative mobilization and home discharge are important milestones in recovery of full function following major surgery. With improvement in surgical technique, the time has come to evaluate if RALP can be performed on an ambulatory basis. The main aims of this study are: 1. Can RALP be performed on an ambulatory basis and patients ready to be discharged home at 8 pm? 2. To determine if spinal anesthesia reduces pre-discharge pain intensity, stress response and other perioperative side effects. 3. Is sufentanil or fentanyl the analgesic of choice when administered spinally together with bupivacaine as an analgesic. 4. To determine the frequency and severity of cardiac and respiratory complications in the steep Trendelenberg position during RALP. 5. To assess the quality of recovery, quality of life and activities of daily living following ambulatory RALP?
This study evaluates whether surface perineal stimulation is as effective as anal stimulation in reducing urinary incontinence secondary to radical prostatectomy. Half of participants will receive a treatment with surface perineal stimulation, while the other half will receive a treatment with anal stimulation.
Recurrence free survival The patients will be followed in regular time intervals in accordance with the EAU-Guidelines (2010) and the S-3 Guideline for Prostate cancer of the German Urological Association. Data will be updated once yearly for until death.
During transcutaneous mechanical nerve stimulation in spinal cord injured men an increase in pressure was observed in the external urethral sphincter along with an increase in bladder capacity. In a subsequent study it was demonstrated that Transcutaneous Mechanical Nerve Stimulation (TMNS) in women could induce pressure increment of the external urethral sphincter. A pilot study have since shown that after 6 weeks of stimulation 24 out of 33 women suffering from urinary stress incontinence were able to contract their pelvic floor muscles and had become free of symptoms. Another pilot study has shown promising effect on the overactive bladder syndrome. Furthermore pilot studies in men who are incontinent after a radical prostatectomy have shown promising results. A randomized investigation of TMNS applied in the immediate period after a radical prostatectomy to investigate effects on both continence and erectile function is on going. The present study aims to treat urinary incontinence in men who are still incontinent more than 1 year after a radical prostatectomy. A medical vibrator is used daily for a period of 6 weeks and the results of the treatment is then evaluated. The participants will be randomized to 2 groups. Group 1 starts vibration treatment at base line and group 2 starts after 6 weeks when group 1 is done. The groups are compared at baseline, at 6 weeks and at 12 weeks. The stimulation will be performed at the frenulum of the glans penis every day for 6 weeks with an amplitude of 2 mm and a frequency of 100 Hz. Results will be evaluated on the basis of questionnaires, micturition diaries and diaper tests. If the investigators are able to demonstrate a significant reduction in the incontinence symptoms in the subjects the investigators asses that vibration can be a way of reestablishing normal continence in men after a radical prostatectomy.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether specific Micro-RNA expression profiles are related to Prostate cancer outcome.
When a bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (RP) is performed, recovery of erectile function (rigid erections) is reported for up to 80% of patients, who are less than 60 years old. Erectile function recovery is also impacted by patient age, erectile function before surgery, and the length of time after surgery. Current evidence from studies suggests that developing erections is important, however, these studies have been small, and the evidence is not definite. Animal studies suggest that erection medication (Viagra, Levitra, Cialis) may protect erection tissue, even in the absence of erections. However, the correct treatment plan is unknown. For example, how often does a man need to take sildenafil (Viagra®) to protect his erectile function or to maximize his erectile function recovery? Is only using erection medication enough for erectile function recovery? Would penile injections, which almost ensure production of an erection, be better than using sildenafil (Viagra®), or might a combination be even better at helping recovery of erections? These are types of questions this study might answer.
The purpose of this study is to determine if it is technically feasable to repair nerves that are injured as part of a planned surgical removal of the prostate and the surrounding tissue in subjects with prostate cancer. The study will also examine the long term outcomes on erectile function, continence and overall quality of life in the enrolled subjects.