Radiation Exposure Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Best Parameters for Imaging Agent Injection and Scanning Methods in Computed Tomography Angiography
Verified date | April 2021 |
Source | Mackay Memorial Hospital |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Background: The contrast time-enhancement profiles of pulmonary artery (PA) and the aorta differ by using computed tomography (CT) angiography. Our purpose is to identify the optimal CT protocol for assessment of both vessels in one-time CT scan. Methods: The investigators prospectively enrolled 101 cases of CT angiography with suspicion of pulmonary embolism or aortic dissection in our center from 2018 to 2020. Forty cases receiving traditional two-time CT scans were collected retrospectively from 2015 to 2018. The investigators designed four groups: test bolus (TB) I, II and bolus-tracking (BT) I, II. The enhancement of the both vessels and the radiation dose of these four groups were collected. Traditional group was separated into traditional PA scan and traditional aorta scan. Data analyzed among the BT groups and the traditional groups were performed.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 101 |
Est. completion date | February 28, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | February 28, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 20 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - All cases with suspicion of pulmonary embolism or aortic dissection referred for CT angiography in our hospital Exclusion Criteria: - Those cases with known allergic history, poor renal function (creatinine level>1.5 mg/dl), pregnant women or age less than twenty years old were excluded from the study. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Taiwan | Mackay Memorial Hospital | Taipei |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Mackay Memorial Hospital |
Taiwan,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Enhancement of the aorta | The enhancement of the aorta at the level of pulmonary artery bifurcation will be recorded for each subject in the four experimental groups. Then, statistical analysis will be conducted to evaluate which group shows better enhancement of the aorta.
The statistical analysis is the following: A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used for comparing the average enhancement of the aorta among the four different groups. If the test of homogeneity of variances was not statistically different, Scheffe method was used for post hoc analysis. On the contrary, Games-Howell method was used for post hoc analysis. A p value of =0.05 was considered statistically significant. |
Through study completion, an average of 1 year | |
Primary | Enhancement of the pulmonary artery | The enhancement of the pulmonary artery at the level of pulmonary artery bifurcation will be recorded for each subject in the four experimental groups. Then, statistical analysis will be conducted to evaluate which group shows better enhancement of the pulmonary artery.
The statistical analysis is the following: A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used for comparing the average enhancement of the pulmonary artery among the four different groups. If the test of homogeneity of variances was not statistically different, Scheffe method was used for post hoc analysis. On the contrary, Games-Howell method was used for post hoc analysis. A p value of =0.05 was considered statistically significant. |
Through study completion, an average of 1 year | |
Secondary | Radiation dose | The overall radiation dose for the complete CT angiography will be recorded for each subject in the four experimental groups. Then, statistical analysis will be conducted to evaluate which group shows less radiation exposure.
The statistical analysis is the following: A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used for comparing the average radiation dose among the four different groups. If the test of homogeneity of variances was not statistically different, Scheffe method was used for post hoc analysis. On the contrary, Games-Howell method was used for post hoc analysis. A p value of =0.05 was considered statistically significant. |
Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03649451 -
Reference Dose Levels During Fluoroscopically Guided Procedures in Operating Rooms
|
||
Completed |
NCT03305978 -
Pulmonary Nodule Detection: Comparison of an Ultra Low Dose vs Standard Scan.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04139096 -
Genetic Susceptibility to Radiation Induced Thyroid Cancer
|
||
Completed |
NCT01430975 -
Prospective Evaluation of Strontium in Patients After CardioGen-82 PET MPI Scanning at Two Clinical Sites
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01424774 -
Prospective Evaluation of Strontium in Patients After CardioGen-82 PET MPI Scanning
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00378053 -
A Prospective Study of Radiation Exposure to Surgeons
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05561439 -
Individual Dosimetric Monitoring of Workers During Interventional Radiology and Cardiology Procedures for Cardiologists and Radiologists in France
|
||
Completed |
NCT04078165 -
Suspended Personal Protection System Versus Conventional Protection (Aka Zero-Gravity vs Shield and Apron)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04694391 -
Genomic Study of Relapse Esophageal Cancer After Radiotherapy
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04403815 -
Radiation Exposure During Coronary Procedures According to Vascular Access
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04285944 -
Operator Radiation Protection During Cardiac Catheterization Using Mavig X-ray Protective Drapes®.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04363190 -
Genomic Instability in Vascular Surgeons
|
||
Completed |
NCT04404257 -
Reduce Radiation Exposure in Fluoroscopic Interventions Evaluation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04678258 -
Zero Fluoroscopy Voltage Guided vs. Linear CTI Ablation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03386500 -
Safety Study of BMX-001 (Radio-protector) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Anal Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05833516 -
Hyper Adduction of Right Radial Artery/Arm vs Left Drag Over Technique
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03946280 -
Utility of 3D Navigation to Reduce Ionizing Radiation in Common Flutter Ablation. Study of Personnel and Patient Dosimetry
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03985488 -
Radiation Exposure Assessment in Fluoroscopy
|
||
Completed |
NCT03605030 -
Reducing Radiation Exposure to Operators During Invasive Cardiac Procedures
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02689908 -
Individualized Radiation Dose Control
|
N/A |