Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

This trial investigates operator radiation doses when performing standardized procedures using two different means of radiation protection, namely conventional lead shield and apron versus suspended protection system (Zero-Gravity, ZG). The performed procedure is standard endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). The hypothesis is that ZG offers superior protection for the operator.


Clinical Trial Description

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is less invasive than open surgery, yet the procedure causes sustained radiation exposure to the operator and has a potential risk of radiation-induced skin damage and later malignancy. The deterministic (threshold limited) adverse effects of radiation have been known since the invention of the X-ray in 1895, but the stochastic (non-threshold limited) adverse effects are not so apparent and thus need constant refinement. Diligent usage of radiation protection and abidance to ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principles minimizes cumulative radiation exposure. The lens of the human eye is very sensitive to radiation and cataract formation has been reported among medical interventional practitioners. Previous research into differences between conventional protection (apron and shields) and suspended personal protection (Zero Gravity, ZG) claims superior protection, especially to the lens, while using a suspended personal protection system. Ancillary lead glasses may be needed to fully protect the eyes. In other studies randomization of methods was deemed irrelevant due to expected dramatic differences between conventional and suspended protection systems. In addition standardization of procedures was lacking, because of cohort matching difficulties. The methods of measuring scattered radiation varies among previous studies and we have found the evaluation methods flawed. The aim of this research is to evaluate the total radiation exposure to the interventionalist and assistant during infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm stent-grafting, while using either conventional protection (lead apron and shield) or a suspended personal protection system (Zero-Gravity, ZG). The ZG system consists of a lead shield that is suspended from the ceiling or a separate hanger that permits freedom of motion of the operator, and with no weight supported by the operator. The total radiation doses have seen considerate reduction already in Helsinki, Finland and lower doses may influence the efficacy of the ZG system. Improper usage of the ZG protection gear as a whole can lead to inefficient protection. The operator's subjective ergonomic feel and experience will be evaluated with a postoperative questionnaire. The patients will be randomized into two groups: one where the operator will be using conventional protection (shield and apron) and one where the operator will be using the ZG system. The data will be collected during a four month period, which includes approximately 50 standardized EVAR operations. Dosimeters will be used to collect the data during the procedures and are placed in various anatomical regions (eye, chest, leg, stomach, control outside protection). The exposure dosage to the eye is measured with EYE-D (Eye lens TLD dosimeter) and other measurements are done using DIS-1 dosimeters. Other data collected includes total fluoroscopy duration, total dose area product (DAP), entrance skin air KERMA (ESAK), and body mass index. The anonymity and rights of participants will be protected. The health of patients is of uttermost importance and there is no difference in care received. The planning and design has started since May 2019. Data collection will commence after dosimeter testing in September 2019 and last until December 2019. After data analysis the results will be disseminated in Spring 2020. Literature review will take place parallel to the research. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04078165
Study type Interventional
Source Helsinki University Central Hospital
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date September 2, 2019
Completion date April 30, 2021

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03649451 - Reference Dose Levels During Fluoroscopically Guided Procedures in Operating Rooms
Completed NCT03305978 - Pulmonary Nodule Detection: Comparison of an Ultra Low Dose vs Standard Scan. N/A
Recruiting NCT04139096 - Genetic Susceptibility to Radiation Induced Thyroid Cancer
Completed NCT01424774 - Prospective Evaluation of Strontium in Patients After CardioGen-82 PET MPI Scanning N/A
Completed NCT01430975 - Prospective Evaluation of Strontium in Patients After CardioGen-82 PET MPI Scanning at Two Clinical Sites N/A
Completed NCT00378053 - A Prospective Study of Radiation Exposure to Surgeons N/A
Recruiting NCT05561439 - Individual Dosimetric Monitoring of Workers During Interventional Radiology and Cardiology Procedures for Cardiologists and Radiologists in France
Recruiting NCT04694391 - Genomic Study of Relapse Esophageal Cancer After Radiotherapy
Not yet recruiting NCT04403815 - Radiation Exposure During Coronary Procedures According to Vascular Access
Recruiting NCT04285944 - Operator Radiation Protection During Cardiac Catheterization Using Mavig X-ray Protective Drapes®. N/A
Completed NCT04363190 - Genomic Instability in Vascular Surgeons
Completed NCT04404257 - Reduce Radiation Exposure in Fluoroscopic Interventions Evaluation N/A
Recruiting NCT04678258 - Zero Fluoroscopy Voltage Guided vs. Linear CTI Ablation N/A
Recruiting NCT03386500 - Safety Study of BMX-001 (Radio-protector) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Anal Cancer Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05833516 - Hyper Adduction of Right Radial Artery/Arm vs Left Drag Over Technique
Recruiting NCT03946280 - Utility of 3D Navigation to Reduce Ionizing Radiation in Common Flutter Ablation. Study of Personnel and Patient Dosimetry N/A
Completed NCT03985488 - Radiation Exposure Assessment in Fluoroscopy
Completed NCT03605030 - Reducing Radiation Exposure to Operators During Invasive Cardiac Procedures N/A
Recruiting NCT02689908 - Individualized Radiation Dose Control N/A
Completed NCT05347290 - Comparison Of Effective Radiation Shielding Between Rampart IC, M1128 Shield vs Conventional Apron And Shields In Clinical Interventional Procedures N/A