View clinical trials related to Pulmonary Eosinophilia.
Filter by:Two parts: A:Case-control study including 15 healthy adult donors and 15 severe adult eosinophilic asthmatics selected for treatment with mepolizumab. B: A longitudinal cohort study,where the same patients once on mepolizumab treatment are followed over time (0, 4, 16 and 32 weeks). SCOPE: response to mepolizumab in severe adult eosinophilic asthma. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Male or female, 18-75 years-old, with severe eosinophilic asthma. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Smoking history, recent exacerbations, other pulmonary or systemic disease with eosinophilia, malignancy, pregnancy, obesity (BMI >35). OBJECTIVES: General objective: Discovery of predictive/prognostic biomarkers of response to mepolizumab using flow cytometry, transcriptomic, and proteomic technologies. OTHER OBJECTIVES: 1.-To identify changes in surface markers of eosinophils and eosinophil subpopulations in response to treatment with mepolizumab using flow cytometry techniques. 2.-Transcriptomic analysis to identify mRNAs within the eosinophil transcriptome displaying enhanced or reduced levels in response to treatment with mepolizumab.3.-Proteomic profiling to identify proteins with differential abundance within the eosinophils in response to treatment with mepolizumab.4.-Check whether late-onset severe eosinophilic asthmatics display elevated levels of IGF-1, IGF-BP3, IGF-ALS in serum samples, if the response of mepolizumab depends on the levels of this markers, and if treatment with this biological reduces the concentration in serum of these IGF-family members. 5.-Identify proteins with differential abundance within the deep serum proteome of patients with SEA in response to treatment with mepolizumab by means of non-targeted proteomic analysis. MEASUREMENTS: Flow cytometry assays with multimarker panels 1 (regulatory), 2 (activation), and 3 eosinophil subsets. Clinical, hematological, biochemical and flow cytometry data generated at times T4, T16 and T32. Total RNA extraction from eosinophil lysates, assay of quality and quantity of RNA, and storage at -80ºC. Evaluation of the levels of 770 human protein-coding mRNAs linked to the recruitment, activation, and effector functions of myeloid cells by means of a direct multiplexed molecular measurement platform named nCounter® NanoString) in combination with a pre-made "nCounter® Human Myeloid Innate Immunity Panel (v2)". Perform retrotranscription and qPCR analyses of those mRNAs in eosinophils displaying the greatest abundance changes in response to mepolizumab treatment according to the nCounter® study. In addition, some additional mRNAs not included in the "nanoString Myeloid Innate Immunity" panel, such as FOXP3 (regulatory function), CRLF2, ST2, or IL-7R (cytokine receptors; activation), will be analysed. HPRT1 gene will be used as a house-keeping gene in this set of RTqPCR experiments. Perform SWATH-MS analysis in samples from 15 healthy donors and 15 patients (T0, T4, T16, T32) ("information-dependent acquisition" method or IDA; "Targeted label-free proteomics") in eosinophil homogenates. High abundant serum protein depletion using two protocols (P1: affinity chromatography, and P2: DTT precipitation) and SWATH-MS analysis of medium-low abundant serum proteome in samples from 15 healthy donors and 15 patients (T0, T4, T16, T32) ("information-dependent acquisition" method or IDA; "Targeted label-free proteomics").
Interleukin (IL)-5 is the main cytokine responsible for the activation of eosinophils, hence therapeutic strategies have been investigated and developed for clinical use. Biologics targeting IL-5 and its receptor (first mepolizumab and subsequently, reslizumab and benralizumab), have been recently approved and used as add-on therapy for severe eosinophilic asthma resulting in a reduction in the circulating eosinophil count, improvement in lung function and exacerbation reduction in patients with severe asthma. Response to biologic therapies in severe asthma is variable, with patients being either non-responders, responders or super-responders. There is currently no explanation for this broad variation in response. It is important to examine whether these patients have distinct characteristics that could help the treating physician in making the correct diagnosis in clinical practice. Aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the efficacy of mepolizumab, a humanized IL-5 antagonist monoclonal antibody in patients with late-onset severe eosinophilic asthma with fixed obstruction and to identify the characteristics of non-responders and super-responders under mepolizumab treatment. This study is considered as non-interventional and every procedure included is happening in a clinical routine for the diagnosis and phenotyping of the asthmatic patients. Hypothesis includes the efficacy of mepolizumab treatment in late-onset severe eosinophilic asthmatic patients with fixed obstruction and relation to clinical and inflammatory biomarkers. Patients will be collected from the outpatient clinics of bronchial asthma from each site included (8 in number) which cover the whole population of Greece. Overall, this is a prospective multicenter study including eight Pulmonary Clinics. Five Pulmonary University Clinics, two of National Health System and one Army General Hospital in Thessaloniki. The study will include a screening period of up to 2 weeks to assess eligibility and obtain written informed consent, a mepolizumab treatment period of 52 weeks, once every 4 weeks, including follow up visits every 3 months during treatment. The study population will consist of 45 patients with late-onset severe eosinophilic asthma and fixed obstruction receiving mepolizumab, aged 20 and above.
Mepolizumab is an anti-interleukin-5 ( IL-5) monoclonal antibody that neutralizes IL-5 and reduces eosinophil counts in both sputum and blood. Omalizumab is an anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) monoclonal antibody (mAb) used in the treatment of severe allergic eosinophilic asthma The investigators propose that in patients with the dual phenotypes of severe allergic and eosinophilic asthma, that Mepolizumab is as effective as Omalizumab. However, this trial will also identify key clinical biomarkers that will clarify which patients will respond best to each of these interventions. This study will be the first direct clinical comparison of these agents and will apply expert clinical characterization, along with cutting edge biotechnology to better inform treatment choices for severe asthma. This is an important and urgent management problem facing the Australian pharmaceutical scheme, where imprecision in prescribing will result in reduced clinical effectiveness as well as substantial and sustained costs.
The objective of the study is to establish the predictive value of early blood gene expression signature of Benralizumab response associated with a significant reduction of the number of exacerbations in treated severe asthmatic patients. This trial is a French, multicenter and no-randomized trial. Patients enrolled will be clinically followed for 16 months (the treatment period: 12 months and 1 month follow-up; 6 clinical visit on site and in phone call at 13 months)
Chronic airway inflammation rich in eosinophils is an important feature seen in asthma. Airway and blood eosinophilia is associated with increased rates of asthma exacerbations and more intense treatment. Recently, the existence of two distinct eosinophils subtypes was revealed-lung-resident eosinophils (rEOS), which maturate independently to interleukin (IL) 5, with the primary function to maintain tissue homeostasis, and inflammatory eosinophils (iEOS), which mature in IL-5-dependent manner and are mainly involved in immune responses. Eosinophils' effect on the airway remodeling in asthma depends not only on the activity but also by their viable number in the lungs. Blood iEOS infiltrate the airways mainly after the environmental stimulus like allergen and leave the airways with bronchial secretions. However, rEOS reside lung tissue for their entire lifetime regulating local immunity. Blood rEOS and iEOS ratio alters in asthma, compared with healthy controls. It is known that the predominant eosinophils subtype in allergic asthma are iEOS, while rEOS are basic subtype in severe eosinophilic asthma patients, moreover, they are different in adhesive properties and survivability as well. Distinct biological properties allows to speculate about their different functions in asthma, however, there are still little information. Data about differently expressed microRNA (miRNA) profiles in eosinophils in asthma suggests, that eosinophils subtypes can be distinct in non-coding RNA (ncRNA) - microRNA (miRNA), piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA) and long non-coding RNA (IncRNA) profiles that could describe their role in asthma pathogenesis and act as biomarkers to discern asthma phenotypes.
Introduction: The etiology and therapy of eosinophilic lung diseases are still poorly understood. For individual forms of disease, such as eosinophilic asthma or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), new therapeutic approaches exist that block the interleukin IL-5 or the IL-5 receptor. Eosinophilic manifestations of the respiratory tract can exclusively affect the lungs or occur as part of a systemic disease. The manifestations partially overlap and are clinically difficult to differentiate (e.g. eosinophilic asthma, Samter Triad, EGPA or hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES)). It is now known that blood eosinophil counts correlate with the level of eosinophils recruited to the airways. However, it is still unclear whether there is a blood eosinophilia without clinical relevance or whether there is a risk of organ damage (e.g. in HES). Hence, different subtypes of eosinophils with different polarization are discussed. Aim of the study: A registry of patients with eosinophilia and respiratory manifestation will be established at the University Hospital of Innsbruck. The course of disease will be evaluated prospectively in a non-interventional study. This study stands on three main clinical pillars with focus on further characterization of eosinophilic cells: 1. Patients will be included who switch from a previous application of the anti-IL5 antibody mepolizumab (production and administration of the injection from lyophysate through the doctor) to the pre-mixed pen (self-injection at home). 2. Furthermore, special focus is set on patients suffering from the so-called Samter Triad. In these patients, the control of asthma, nasal polyps and NSAID intolerance will be examined in an interdisciplinary fashion during the course of treatment. 3. Previous clinical studies at our Department indicate that some patients with severe eosinophilic asthma or Samter Triad could represent a mono-organic or limited manifestation of lymphoid HES. This hypothesis is tested by measuring additional chemokines, somatic mutations and FACS parameters in this subgroup to verify a clonal disease. In addition, translational research will differentiate resident and inflammatory eosinophilic granulocytes by FACS analysis and further characterize them by fluorescence microscopy, electron microscopy, gene chip analysis and lipidomics, in the above-mentioned diseases and in healthy controls, respectively. Patients and methods: All patients suffering from eosinophilia with pulmonary involvement who are diagnosed with eosinophilic asthma, EGPA, Samter Triad, HES, and eosinophilic pneumonia with signed consent are included in the prospective registry. Provided, that they are registered at the outpatient department of pneumology, ENT, haematology or allergology at the University Hospital Innsbruck. The investigators will collect laboratory analyses, lung function, imaging, bone marrow biopsies, ENT findings and allergological findings over the course of the study. Furthermore, additional blood tubes are collected during routine blood tests, which are used to identify and characterize subtypes of eosinophilic granulocytes. Risks for patients: No additional examinations, blood sampling or invasive measures are required for the patient. Thus, there is no additional risk for study participants. Risks for control subjects: In order to be able to compare our results with the healthy population, volunteer subjects are recruited. After consent has been given, a blood sample is taken. Despite the low risk, it is theoretically possible that blood sampling may be accompanied by non-severe complications (such as hematoma, infection). Benefits: The investigators expect new insights into phenotype and therapy of patients with eosinophilic manifestations of the respiratory tract.
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma will be placed on biologics if they continue to be uncontrolled despite maximized inhalation therapy or if they are only controlled under oral corticosteroids. Among biologics, 80% of patients respond to treatment and improve clinically, but approximately 20% are non-responders and up to date no established predictive factors for treatment response exist. Among the responders, about 30% respond very well (so-called super responders), the rest shows moderate improvements. As the lung function, one main criterion to evaluate treatment response improves in most patients with delay, the response (or non-response) to treatment can only be reliably estimated after 4 to 12 months. This can lead to prolonged use of medication in non-responders (overtreatment) on one hand and to unjustified and premature termination of therapy (undertreatment) on the other hand (GINA report 2019). Functional lung MRI has the potential to show early changes in lung microstructure, regional ventilation and perfusion and thus has the potential for early detection of therapy response. Very promising results of dynamic regional ventilation and perfusion mapping using phase resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI have been shown recently. However, if functional lung MRI can reliably detect treatment effects under Mepolizumab therapy and can help to predict a long-term patient outcome is still unknown. As these findings could directly influence clinical decision making this question is of high clinical relevance.
Rationale: Despite the availability of effective treatment to reach symptom control, nearly half of the asthma patients remain inadequately controlled. There is a need for timely and appropriate treatment of patients with uncontrolled asthma. Improving asthma control could be achieved by a better identification of causes followed by remediating modifiable factors in primary care or referral to secondary care. However, major gaps in evidence-based asthma practice exist in primary care. So far, there is a lack of knowledge on the prevalence of inadequate asthma and associated characteristics. Objective: The primary objective is to determine the proportion of primary care patients with inadequate asthma control, as assessed during a regular control consultation with the general practice nurse. Study design: This is a non-interventional prospective observational study, taking place in a real-world primary care setting. The AsthmaOptimiser tool will be used during regular asthma consultations in primary care, which the healthcare provider will fill in together with the patient. The AsthmaOptimiser tool creates an overview of factors and characteristics that may be associated with uncontrolled asthma, and subsequently provides a guideline-based management suggestion. Additionally, we will perform qualitative interviews to collect experiences and perspectives of healthcare providers on their use of the AsthmaOptimiser tool, including, but not limited to, ease of use, points of improvement, and on their implementation of the management suggestions. Study population: Patients diagnosed with asthma, who attend a pre-planned primary care asthma review, are eligible to participate. A limited number of in- and exclusion criteria will be adopted, to make sure the research population closely resembles the real world. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with inadequate asthma control. Inadequate asthma control will be defined as an exacerbation in the past 4 weeks and/or an ACQ6 (i.e., Asthma Control Questionnaire) score >0.75.
This study is Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic of Recombinant anti-IL-5 Humanized Monoclonal Antibody injection in Healthy Subjects. There are 6 Groups as follows: 0.03mg/kg (S1), 0.2mg/kg (S2), 1.0mg/kg (S3), 3.0mg/kg (S4), 5.0mg/kg (S5) and 7.5mg/kg (S6); and 2 subjects were included in the S1 group (both received study drugs); 10 subjects were included in each of the S2 ~ S6 groups (of which 8 received study drugs and 2 received placebo). Pharmacokinetics and Anti-drug antibody (ADA) data will be collected; Drug safety, tolerance, efficacy and immunogenicity for healthy subjects will be evaluated.
Daptomycin is an antibiotic from the family of cyclic lipopeptides, bactericide, concentration-dependent. Its spectrum concerns Gram-positive bacteria. Since the authorization of daptomycin in 2006, cases of eosinophilic pneumonia and pulmonary eosinophilia associated with its use have been reported in Europe and worldwide. The purpose of this study is to describe the mechanism of occurrence of this AE with dapto; Prolonged exposure and accumulation at the alveolar level could potentially have a role. Better understanding the mechanisms of appearance of this AE would provide predictive elements making it possible to limit the occurrence of this AE in the future