Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Severity |
Change in self-report experience of PTSD symptoms, assessed by using the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ-16). This indicator will be constructed as the average PTSD severity score taking the average of the 16 items in HTQ-16 with a range from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicate worse symptoms. |
Baseline, 3 months follow-up, 12 months follow-up |
|
Primary |
Depression and Anxiety |
Change in self-report experience of depression and anxiety symptoms, assessed by using the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25). This indicator will be the average of 16 items, ranging from 0 to 3 where higher score indicates greater severity of depression or anxiety. |
Baseline, 3 months follow-up, 12 months follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Self-esteem |
Change in self-reported measure of self-esteem, assessed using Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale with 10 items that are rated on a 4-point Likert Scale (minimum value:0 and maximum value:3). After reversing the negative items, the self-esteem index will be constructed as the average of the per-item scores, higher scores indicating higher self-esteem. |
Baseline, 3 months follow-up, 12 months follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Management of problems |
Change in self-reported measure of management of problems in certain activities when they feel bad, such as talking to friends, family, other women with similar things, praying, working, locking herself in the house, drinking alcohol, singing, spending time with others. . After reversing the negative items, the index for management of problems will be constructed by taking the average of the values of the 8 items. The items are rated on a 4-point Likert Scale, with item values ranging from "0=Not at all/Never" to "3=Often". Higher scores will indicate improved management of problems (minimum value:0 and maximum value:3). |
Baseline, 3 months follow-up, 12 months follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Local functioning impairment index |
Change in self-reported experience of difficulties in performing certain activities, specifically to what extent they are experiencing difficulties in performing activities, such as farming, income generating activities, housework, socializing with family and community members, focusing on their tasks and responsibilities, cooking, taking care of children, exchange ideas, do any type of manual work, receive help, make important decisions, learn new skills, and interact with people they don't know in the last 4 weeks. The local functioning impairment index will be created by taking the average of 14 item scores rated on a 5-point Likert scale with values ranging from "0=No difficulty" to "4=So difficult that she couldn't do it". Higher scores will indicate greater impairment in local functioning (minimum value:0 and maximum value:4) |
Baseline, 3 months follow-up, 12 months follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Labor force participation |
Changes in the participation of respondents in income generating activities in the last 7 days. This indicator will be constructed as binary variable equal to 1 if the respondent reported any kind of work in the last 7 days, such as paid in-kind, unpaid, self-employment, non-farm family business or family farm. |
Baseline, 3 months follow-up, 12 months follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Total Earnings |
Change in the respondent's total earnings in the last 30 days (in main and secondary activities) in USD. This indicator will be the sum of the respondent's earnings from her main and secondary activities in the last 30 days. |
Baseline, 3 months follow-up, 12 months follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Saving behavior |
Changes in the number of participants who saved in the last 6 or 12 months. |
Baseline, 3 months follow-up, 12 months follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Total amount of savings |
Changes in the total amount of savings (formal or informal) in the last 6 or 12 months. |
Baseline, 3 months follow-up, 12 months follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Decision-making power |
Changes in the power of decision of the participant. We will create a power of decision index capturing the respondent's weight in making decisions regarding 1) her own income, 2) pregnancy, 3) children's education, 4) her own health care, 5) household money, 6) major purchases, and 7) visits to her family. We will construct the index by taking the mean of the items, where a higher score indicates more power of decision making. The range is [0-2]. |
Baseline, 3 months follow-up, 12 months follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Food insecurity |
Changes in the number of average number of meals that the members of the respondent's household had to skip in the past 7 days, conditional on anyone in the household having to skip meal because there was not enough food. |
Baseline, 3 months follow-up, 12 months follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Sharing of housework |
Changes in the average score of the level of the participation of the respondent's partner in the domestic tasks. We will create this indicator as the average score of the level of the participation of the respondent's partner in the tasks of cooking and laundry-cleaning. First, we will score the partner's participation per task. Then we will create the index by taking the average score over the two tasks. The index will have a range of [0-3] with higher scores indicating more participation of the partner. |
Baseline, 3 months follow-up, 12 months follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Respondent and household asset ownership |
Changes in the number of items owned by the respondent and the household |
Baseline and 12 months follow-up |
|