View clinical trials related to Pterional Craniotomy.
Filter by:This is a clinical trial where patients who present to the neurosurgery service in need of a procedure that requires a pterional craniotomy will be screened, and if eligible, enrolled for the randomization in the placement of a drain at the surgical site. At present, there is not a protocol for whether or not to use a drain following this procedure. There is some debate on whether it serves any real benefit for the patient or if it may actually be detrimental in cases where infection occurs. This study aims to answer this question by randomizing patients to drain placement and then comparing patient outcomes between the two groups. These include the following: infection rate, length of hospital stay, self-reported patient pain and discomfort, the amount of time before patients are able to open their eye ipsilateral to the side of operation, change in forehead circumference post-op days 1-3, and any unforeseen post-operative complications. This will be accomplished through using a patient-administered survey, recording physical measurements, and a patient chart review. Statistical analysis will then be used to identify any differences that may exist.
The scientific objectives of this study are to systematically study the problems that are created by incising the attachment of the temporalis muscle in a randomized group of patients, and to determine whether another approach that does not detach the temporalis muscle results in less post-operative morbidity. Cutting through the attachment of the temporalis muscle to the skull is a widely-accepted procedure used to gain access to the skull prior to the drilling used for a pterional craniotomy (one of the most frequent types of surgeries used in neurosurgical practice). Despite the frequent use of this maneuver and the known sequelae of temporalis mobilization (e.g. post-operative myofascial pain, temporalis weakness, and pain with mastication), very little is known about the true incidence of these post-operative symptoms. Furthermore, there is very little objective evidence at the present time to support the claim that the incidence and severity of these post-operative phenomena can be decreased with use of an osteoplastic craniotomy (a procedure where the temporalis is left attached to the bony calvarium). The investigators would like to evaluate whether this slightly more time-consuming and technically demanding approach is less morbid in this respect than the contemporary pterional approach. Special note is made that the osteoplastic approach has been used in standard neurosurgical practice for quite some time.