View clinical trials related to Psychoses.
Filter by:Patient-controlled admissions are short self-referred inpatient admissions in mental health services without approval by clinicians. The intention is to reduce a high use of inpatient care. Patients are signing a contract for a specified period with stays limited to a maximum number of days and with a minimum number of weeks between stays. The few studies so far show tendencies to a possible effect, but additional studies are needed. The aims of the study are to describe the use and experiences of patient-controlled admissions, compare the use of inpatient admissions and inpatient days during the 24 months before and after baseline, and to identify subgroups who may benefit from the model. The study is a pre-post prospective intervention study where the use of inpatient admissions in the contract period is compared to a similar period before baseline so that the patients are their own controls. The study is done in inpatient wards in four community mental health centers of Akershus University Hospital, Norway. The study aims to recruit 120 patients. The eligible patients have a severe mental illness, high use of inpatient mental health care the last two years and are expected to benefit from patient-controlled admissions. The patients will be followed for 24 months from baseline. Data at baseline includes socio-demographics, diagnoses, type and severity of psychiatric problems, and use of alcohol and drugs. Data on admissions and experience of these are collected during the contract period, Data on patients' and relatives' experience of the model are collected at the end of the period. Data on total inpatient admissions/stays during the 24 months before and after baseline are extracted from the hospital patient records. Data analyses will include descriptive statistics on the sample and the use of inpatient care, testing of differences of inpatient care between 24 months before and after baseline, multiple regression of associations between baseline characteristics and the use of inpatient care, and analyses to identify subgroups who benefit from the model. The study protocol in Norwegian was approved by the Regional Committee on Medical and Health Research Ethics in Norway South East 29 April 2011 (reg.no. 2011/790). The inclusion period was 2011-2012. Data collection were done 2011-2014. Data extraction from the patient records was done 2015-2016. Quality control and organization of data was done 2017-2018. Data analysis will start in August 2018.
During the 1990s, evidence began to emerge of the long duration of untreated illness prior to receiving treatment for patients with psychotic disorders. Studies across the world on first episode psychosis have consistently found an average of 1 - 2 years between the onset of psychotic symptoms and the start of treatment. Lengthy treatment delay has immediate implications such as unnecessary distress for patients and families, and may also compromise potential recovery when treatment is initiated.By understanding how and why substantial delays occur the investigators may be able to better design interventions to facilitate better earlier treatment. The components of DUP can be conceptualised as comprising 3 distinct intervals: help-seeking delay, referral delay and delay in mental health services. In this study the primary aim is to establish the level of DUP in nordland, and explore the components of this variable. Help-seeking delay will be investigated by interviewing patients presenting at the central mental health hospital in Nordland about their psychosis onset and pathways to care. Referral delay will be investigated by a questionnaire about the referral pratices among GPs in Nordland. Delays in mental health services will be investigated by focus group interviews with leaders and professionals at the 7 community mental health centers in Nordland. This knowledge is believed to be crucial for developing services that can reduce DUP and give this patient population earlier access to adequate treatment.
Adjuvant N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA)-enhancing agents, such as GlyT-1 inhibitors and NMDA-glycine site agonists have been demonstrated to be beneficial for chronic schizophrenia patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of add-on treatment of an inhibitor of D-amino acid oxidase (DAAOI), DAAOI-1, in chronically stable schizophrenia patients who have been stabilized with antipsychotics.
Both GlyT-1 inhibitors and NMDA-glycine site agonists have been demonstrated to be beneficial for chronic schizophrenia patients. The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of add-on treatment of sarcosine, a GlyT-1 inhibitor, and D-serine, an NMDA-glycine site agonist, in chronically stable schizophrenia patients who have been stabilized with antipsychotics.
Compare the effectiveness of 3 strategies by pharmacists to decrease the time to refill of prescriptions for common chronic diseases (diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, heart failure, depression, psychoses).
The etiology of schizophrenia remains unclear. Schizophrenia patients reveal positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and cognitive impairments. In addition to dopamine system hyperactivity, hypofunction of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor plays a role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Consequently, enhancing NMDA receptor neurotransmission has been considered as a novel treatment approach. To date, there have been several trials on NMDA enhancers reported. For example, sarcosine (N-methylglycine, a glycine transporter I inhibitor) showed therapeutic effects not only in chronically stable patients but also in acutely exacerbated ones when added-on to antipsychotics. In addition, sarcosine yields excellent safety profiles, in comparison to current antipsychotics. It remains unclear whether NMDA enhancers, such as sarcosine, can serve as monotherapy for schizophrenia. The aims of this project are to examine the efficacy and safety of sarcosine monotherapy for acutely-ill schizophrenic patients, and to compare the effects of 2 grams/day, effective dose, with 1 gram/day, ineffective lower dose.
The study will provide an empirical basis for a pharmacological treatment option. An open-label, randomized, multi-centre parallel group design is used. An intensified clinical management (CM), which allows needs-based psychological crisis intervention, is compared to a combination of such a CM and the atypical neuroleptic amisulpride. The central hypothesis is that the combination of a clinical management with an atypical neuroleptic is the superior treatment.
Prodrome based early intervention with an antipsychotic drug vs. benzodiazepine was applied in patients with first episode schizophrenia after one year neuroleptic maintenance treatment. Two groups of patients were followed over a period of 1 year: one further on under maintenance neuroleptic treatment, the other one after stepwise drug discontinuation.
After one year neuroleptic maintenance treatment in patients with first episode schizophrenia, neuroleptic treatment will be continued vs. stepwise discontinued (randomized design) over a period of 1 year. Under both conditions prodrome based early intervention take place.
The purpose of this clinical research study is to assess the safety and tolerability of aripiprazole in patients with psychosis associated with Parkinson's disease.