View clinical trials related to Psychomotor Agitation.
Filter by:This study is designed to determine and evaluate the optimal BXCL501 starting dose (StartD) that will safely and effectively reduce agitation associated with delirium in ICU patients. This is an ascending adaptive dose study evaluating the safety and efficacy of four potential starting doses of BXCL501 (120 μg, 180 μg, 240 μg, and 300 μg) in reducing agitation levels in adult ICU patients with delirium. For subjects 65 years of age and older, the potential doses will be reduced 50% in line with the Precedex (reference drug) label. The purpose of this clinical trial is to identify an optimally safe and effective BXCL501
The investigator will examine the safety, tolerability, optimal dose, and preliminary efficacy of dexmedetomidine sublingual film in a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial in 40 hospitalized patients with hyperactive delirium (i.e., delirium with agitation) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting. Specific Aim #1 (safety and tolerability): To examine the incidence of cardiovascular and other side effects following the administration of dexmedetomidine sublingual film in patients hospitalized in the ICU with delirium and agitation in a randomized, double-blind trial (total N=80 patients with delirium [with or without agitation], with a goal of administering dexmedetomidine to at least 40 participants with agitation). Hypothesis: Dexmedetomidine sublingual film will be associated with hypotension and/or bradycardia requiring clinical intervention in ≤ 20% (8 of 40) participants. Dexmedetomidine will not be associated with QTc prolongation or non-cardiac adverse events. Specific Aim #2 (preliminary efficacy): To examine the impact of dexmedetomidine sublingual film on agitation and delirium severity. Hypothesis: Dexmedetomidine will lead to reductions in agitation and delirium severity during the follow-up period (co-primary endpoints = 1 and 2 hours post-administration). Specific Aim #3 (optimal dosing): To identify the minimum dose that is effective at reducing agitation and delirium severity without causing significant side effects. Hypothesis: Participants receiving doses of 60 mcg of dexmedetomidine will have a faster time to a reduction in agitation and greater reductions in delirium severity than participants receiving 20 mcg of dexmedetomidine.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of acute leg cycling conditions at three different intensities versus a control condition condition on symptoms of restless legs syndrome (RLS) in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). This study includes a proposed sample of 24 participants diagnosed with both MS and RLS that will complete four sessions of supervised exercise or rest conditions in the lab, one session per week, over the course of four weeks.
Restless leg syndrome (RLS) is sleep disorder characterized by an unpleasant feeling in the lower limbs, which can be accompanied by paresthesias, and need for urgent movement of the legs. Its diagnosis is clinical, based on an International Committee of the Study of RLS (International Restless Legs Syndrome Study) questionnaire. Its prevalence is about 5-15% in the general population, being twice as frequent in women and with a tendency to increase incidence with aging. In the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population, mainly in patients on dialysis, the prevalence increases by up to 70%. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with RLS and active vitamin D supplementation seems to improve RLS and severity. It is seems, studies on the role of vitamin D supplementation in CKD population are missing. The clinical-scientific hypothesis of this study is that replacement of vitamin D (cholecalciferol) will improve the symptoms of RLS. As parathyroidectomy can relieve RLS, the aim of researchers is to randomize patients with CKD on dialysis to receive cholecalciferol or placebo in 2 distinct groups: secondary hyperparathyroidism and adynamic bone disease.
The purpose of this study is to to establish proof-of-concept for efficacy of iron isomaltoside 1000 in subjects with Restless Legs Syndrome. The study is a randomised, comparative, double-blind study with a 3 months extension. Subjects with restless leg syndrome (RLS) will be randomised 2:1 to one of the following treat-ment groups: - Group A (42 subjects): 1000 mg iron isomaltoside 1000 - Group B (21 subjects): Placebo infusion Furthermore, non-responders, who continue to meet entry requirements, will receive 1000 mg iron isomaltoside 1000 at week 6.
The primary objective of the study is to determine whether Butrans Transdermal System (BTDS) reduces RLS symptom severity in patients with moderate to severe idiopathic RLS who are naïve to opiate treatment. The secondary objective of the study is to investigate the effects of BTDS on mood, sleep, and quality of life. The study will consist of nine visits. Depending on the need for medication titration, there may also be two scheduled telephone contacts. Visit 1: This is a screening visit to determine study eligibility. Eligible subjects who choose to participate must undergo medication washout as described in the detailed protocol between visits 1 and 2. Treatment period #1 (Visits 2 - 5; day 0 - 28): Baseline measures will be recorded and subjects randomized to treatment order at visit 2 (day 0). Study medication as well as rescue medication (l-dopa, a non-blinded active treatment to be used within a limited dose range as described in the detailed protocol) will be dispensed. Subjects will begin treatment period #1 immediately after this. The study medication will be titrated within the allowed range according to subject's reported symptoms during visit 3 (day 7), visit 4 (day 14), telephone contact (day 21). Visit 5 will occur on day 28 and will include assessment of outcome measures for the first treatment period. Visit 5 will also mark the beginning of the second treatment period. Treatment period #2 (Visits 6 - 8; day 28 - 56): Procedures will be similar to those described above during treatment period #1. Visit 8 will mark the end of the second treatment period during which outcome measures will be ascertained. Follow up visit (Visit 9; day 70): This will be a safety follow-up visit approximately two weeks after visit 8 for review of adverse events.
This research study is being done to find out if one of two drugs, ketamine or haloperidol, is better for treating agitation. Agitation is a state of extreme emotional disturbance where patients can become physically aggressive or violent, endangering themselves and those who are caring for them. Often chemical substances or severe mental illness is involved in this level of agitation. Specifically, the investigators are interested in studying agitation that is treated in the prehospital setting by paramedics. This study's hypothesis is that ketamine is superior to haloperidol for treatment of agitation in the prehospital environment.
Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a debilitating sleep disorder that has significant impact on quality of life, and often times can be difficult to diagnose and treat effectively. RLS is typically treated with medical therapy (including dopaminergic agents, dopamine agonists, benzodiazepines, anticonvulsants, opiates, among other therapies). Many patients are either refractory to medical therapy, have contraindications or adverse reactions to the available medical therapies, or desire conservative non-medication based therapies. Two previous studies have demonstrated that pneumatic compression devices placed on the legs can improve symptoms of RLS. We would like to assess whether the Venous Health Systems Vasculaire leg compression device improves symptoms and quality of life measures related to RLS in up to 40 patients evaluated prospectively for one month. This is a pilot study to assess the subjective response of our cohort of patients to this device prospectively. Our hypothesis is that over 66% of our cohort will demonstrate a positive symptomatic response based on RLS specific quality of life questionnaires.
The purpose of this study is to assess efficacy and safety of pregabalin in treating moderate to severe Restless Legs Syndrome in comparison to placebo.
The primary objective is to determine if ziprasidone is superior to standard therapies in the emergency department treatment of the acutely agitated patient. The primary outcome will be the length of time taken until the patient is ready to be evaluated by the psychiatric service, or until a disposition is made.