View clinical trials related to Psychological Distress.
Filter by:Mental health problems are increasing in Pakistan and there is a 90% treatment gap in mental health services. Accessibility towards mental health services is limited due to range of factors including low income and resources, lack of the trained staff and lack of specialized and non-specialized mental health facilities. Therefore, there is a dire need to develop indigenous solution of the mental health issues grounded in Islamic teaching. In this regard this study is designed to address the mental health issues at community level. Therefore, this study divided into two phases. In first phase the aim of the study is to adapt World Health Organization recommended psychological intervention for paraprofessionals and to train the paraprofessional on this indigenously adapted intervention. Subsequently, in second phase the study aims to assess the effectiveness of the indigenously adapted Problem Management Plus (IA-PM+) as an evidence based remedy in the treatment of psychological distress of person living with disabilities (PWDs).
Rationale: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the mental health of healthcare workers (HCWs). This study combines two low-intensity psychological interventions developed by the World Health Organization (Doing What Matters [DWM] and Problem Management Plus [PM+]) into a stepped-care program for HCWs. Objective: The main objective is to evaluate the implementation and (cost-)effectiveness of the culturally and contextually adapted DWM/PM+ stepped-care programs amongst health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of mental distress, resilience, wellbeing, health inequalities, and costs to health systems. Study design: Phase 2 (intervention study): pragmatic implementation trial with a single-blinded, randomized, parallel-group design. Phase 3: qualitative process evaluation consisting of individual interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs). Study population: Study phase 2: Health care workers with self-reported elevated psychological distress. Study phase 3: study participants with different trajectories through the trial (completers, non-completers, drop-outs, etc.), family members/close persons of participants, professionals, and facilitators of the DWM and PM+ intervention. Intervention- study phase 2: All participants (in both the treatment and the comparison group) will receive Psychological First Aid (PFA) and care as usual (CAU). In addition to PFA and CAU, the treatment group will receive the stepped-care intervention (DWM with or without PM+) in addition to CAU. The stepped-care intervention consists of DWM (step 1) and conditionally PM+ (step 2) if participants still meet criteria for psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress scale (K10) >15.9) 1 month after having received DWM. Main study parameters/endpoints: Phase 2: Screening for in- and exclusion criteria will be interviewer-administered, in-person or through (video) calls. Online assessments will take place at baseline, at 2 weeks after having received DWM, at 1 week and at 2 months after having received PM+. The main study parameter will be the decrease in symptoms of anxiety and depression from baseline to two-month follow-up, measured through the sum score of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), i.e. the PHQ-Anxiety and Depression Score (PHQ-ADS). Phase 3: Through FGDs and interviews at the end of the study, the feasibility of scaling-up the implementation on the stepped-care DWM/PM+ intervention.
This project is aimed at physiotherapists and physiotherapy students who have been psychologically affected during the COVID 19 pandemic. The objective of the approach is to generate a free intervention programme in virtual modality, from the approach of physiotherapy in mental health, which would help them to alleviate the negative effects of the pandemic, offer them coping tools and collaborate to improve their state of well-being.
The effectiveness study for Culturally-Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (CA-CBI) will be conducted with individuals infected with and recovered from Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) to measure if this intervention is effective in decreasing the COVID-19 survivors' psychological distress. Potential participants will be given an informed consent and then, they will be included in a screening procedure to assess their eligibility. 86 participants (43 in experimental and 43 in control group-randomly assigned) who pass the screening procedure will be invited to the effectiveness study. The experimental group will receive an 8-session intervention while the control group will receive a brief psychoeducation about problems during COVID-19 pandemic and information about the freely available psychological support options. The measurements will be conducted three times; one week before, one week after and five weeks after the intervention.
The effectiveness study for Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Intervention will be conducted with university students to measure if this intervention if effective for decreasing the university students' psychological distress and increase their well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Potential participants will be given an informed consent and included in a screening procedure to decide their eligibility. 100 participants (50 in experimental and 50 in control group-randomly assigned) who pass the screening procedure will be invited to the effectiveness study. The experimental group will receive an 8-session intervention while the control group will receive information about the freely available psychological support options. The measurements will be conducted three times; one week before, one week after and five weeks after the intervention.
The pilot randomized controlled trial aims to assess effects of a guided online acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) intervention on distressed family caregivers of people with dementia (PwD) compared to the control group. A total of 24 family caregivers of PwD who meet the inclusion criteria will be recruited and randomized to either the intervention or control group. Exploratory hypotheses are that the ACT group will show decreases in caregivers' psychological distress and burden and improvements in QoL and engagement in meaningful activities at posttest and 1-month follow-up, compared to the control group. Also, the project will evaluate the feasibility of recruitment, adherence, and retention of caregivers and explore caregivers' experiences in the ACT intervention through semi-structured interviews at posttest. As part of the pretest, we will also explore caregivers' perceived impacts of COVID-19 on daily lives.
This study aimed to investigate the effect of the psychological triaging intervention (PTI) on the psychological distress and resilience capacity levels among the intern-nursing students during the COVID-19 crisis. Research Hypothesis Intern-nursing students who attend PTI exhibit lower COVID-19 related psychological distress level and higher resilience capacity than those who receive routine psychological support.
Food allergy has been found to have a profound impact on parents of children with food allergy, with caregivers experiencing poorer psychological outcomes such as increased stress, anxiety, worry and depression than parents of non-allergic children. Furthermore, they report poorer quality of life (QoL) due to the psychosocial impact of looking after a child with food allergy, identifying the need for parental interventions aimed at improving these outcomes. There has generally been a paucity of research in this area, but there has recently been encouraging evidence to suggest that interventions involving Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) have the potential to improve the lives of those parents impacted by a child's food allergy. This study aims to add to this emerging evidence base by reporting on the feasibility of a brief, group CBT intervention for parents of children with food allergy. This small, proof of concept study also aims to report on a range of psychological measures to see if there is any evidence that this intervention may be effective in improving outcomes. Thirty to forty parents of children with food allergy will be recruited to the study and randomised to receive either a one-day or two half-day group CBT intervention or treatment as usual. Measures of a range of psychological outcomes, food allergy specific QoL and goal-based outcomes will be taken at baseline and at one and three-month follow ups. Participants will be asked for their feedback so that researchers can report on the acceptability of the intervention for those involved. This study is also interested in hearing about the parental experience of accessing psychological therapies as it is still not clear why some parents may require psychological intervention whilst others may not; participants in the intervention group will be invited to take part in interviews in order to share their experiences. It is hoped that this set of findings will help to determine if a brief group CBT intervention could be recommended for efficacy testing as part of a wider effort to provide evidence-based treatments for parents of children with food allergy experiencing poor psychological outcomes and poor food allergic-specific QoL.
The purpose of the study is to examine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of an acceptance-based, insight-oriented treatment approach for US incarcerated adults. Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed through attendance and retention throughout the intervention period. Primary outcomes include negative affect, psychological flexibility, emotion regulation, purpose in life, impulsivity, and trauma. Changes will be assessed from baseline to post-course, post-course to 6-month follow up, and baseline to 6-month follow up for all primary outcomes. Researchers hypothesize that, 1) retention rates will be similar to previous trials with 70% retention from pre- to post-course; 2) there will be significant baseline-to-post-course reductions in psychological symptoms, impulsivity, and trauma, and an increase in psychological flexibility, purpose in life, and emotion regulation; and 3) there will be significant baseline-to-6-month reductions in psychological symptoms, impulsivity, and trauma, and an increase in psychological flexibility, purpose in life, and emotion regulation.
Current models suggest that mental health is not the mere absence of a mental disorder. Rather, mental health consists of two factors, mental disorder symptoms and positive mental health, that can be regarded as continua. Programmes applying interventions known from the positive psychology or positive psychotherapy framework have been shown to enhance psychological wellbeing, subjective wellbeing and to reduce depressive symptoms. However, interventions were mostly conducted in an individual or small group setting and usually consisted of more than one session. The few trainings of minimal length that were conducted in group settings only used one intervention strategy or one part of multicomponent positive psychological interventions. Therefore, the conclusions that can be drawn regarding the effectiveness of short group-interventions are limited. In this study, the investigators plan to conduct an online large-group one-session training to enhance positive mental health that comprises multiple positive psychological interventions (e.g. character strengths, positive communication, goal attainment, etc). Furthermore, an active as well as a passive (waitlist) control group are included in the study. In the active control group, dysfunctional thoughts are adressed that are known to everybody but exist in a great measure in people suffering from depressive disorders. Methods used in cognitive therapy are applied in this group. Participants will be recruited from a community sample without any inclusion criteria but being of legal age. The only exclusion criterion is not having the appropriate technical equipment for participation in a videoconference. Positive mental health as well as other constructs of mental health will be assessed before and after training and at one month and six months follow up to investigate long-term effects of the intervention.