Psoriasis Vulgaris Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety Profile of Oral Versus Subcutaneous Route of Methotrexate Administration in Moderate to Severe Psoriasis
This study is a prospective, single blinded, randomized, pilot study to compare the
effectiveness and safety profile of oral versus subcutaneous route of administration of
methotrexate in management of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. The recruited
participants with moderate to severe psoriasis will be randomized into treatment arms.
Randomization will be done using computer generated random number table. The participants in
the first treatment arm will receive 0.3 mg/kg ( upto a maximum of 25 mg/week ) of weekly
oral methotrexate for 12 weeks or achievement of PASI 90 whichever is earlier while the
participants in second treatment arm will receive subcutaneous methotrexate at 0.3 mg/kg/week
for the same duration. The participants will be followed at regular intervals and monitored
adequately for hematological, hepatotoxic and other adverse effects both clinically and
through laboratory investigations according to methotrexate consensus guidelines during the
treatment period. PASI, percentage of body surface area (BSA) involvement and DLQI will be
assessed at each follow up visit and at the end of 12 weeks. The treatment will be tapered at
the rate of 5 mg/2 weeks and stopped after 12 weeks or achievement of PASI 90 whichever is
earlier.. Follow ups will be done at every 2 weeks until treatment completion (12 weeks) and
at every 4 weeks till 24 weeks after completion of treatment.
The primary outcome measures will be achievement of PASI 90 (90 % reduction in psoriasis area
severity score (PASI) compared to baseline).The secondary outcomes will be improvement in
DLQI (dermatology life quality index), relapse rate and adverse events if any.
Introduction:
Methotrexate is one of the oldest and most commonly used systemic drugs for the treatment of
psoriasis.[1] Even with the advent of other treatment modalities like systemic retinoids and
biologics, methotrexate remains a popular modality for treatment of psoriasis owing to its
cost-effectiveness, ease of administration and greater experience among practitioners
regarding its use.[2] Despite long-term experience in the use of methotrexate in psoriasis,
robust evidence and consensus regarding the ideal dosing schedule and route of administration
is still lacking.[3] Oral route of methotrexate has been found to have unpredictable and
non-linear bioavailability especially at doses greater than 15 mg/kg.[4] Subcutaneous route
of methotrexate on the other hand is associated with better and more linear bioavailability
at higher doses.4 Methotrexate by subcutaneous route has also been known to better
tolerability and lesser gastrointestinal side effects as compared to oral route. [5] Recently
conducted METOP study, which was a randomized controlled study comparing subcutaneous route
of methotrexate administration and placebo in control of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis
concluded that subcutaneous methotrexate is an efficient and safe modality of treatment of
psoriasis. The study also suggested that the pace and longevity of response by subcutaneous
route of methotrexate administration may be better than seen with oral route.[6] A recent
retrospective study also concluded that subcutaneous route of methotrexate is an effective
modality of treatment in patients of psoriasis who have failed oral methotrexate.[7] This
study will be the first randomized controlled trial comparing oral versus subcutaneous route
of administration of methotrexate in its efficacy in clearance of psoriasis and side effect
profile. The study will help in clarification of dilemma of clinicians regarding the ideal
route of administration of methotrexate in psoriasis. It will also further strengthen the
evidence regarding the adverse effects and tolerability of subcutaneous route of methotrexate
administration.
Methodology:
Aim of the study : To compare the effectiveness and safety profile of oral versus
subcutaneous route of administration of methotrexate in patients with moderate to severe
psoriasis.
This study will be an intention to treat single blinded randomized controlled trial. The
participants will be patients with moderate to severe psoriasis fulfilling the inclusion and
exclusion criteria . They will be randomly allocated to the two treatment arms in the
beginning of the study. Participants in one treatment arm will receive methotrexate by oral
route while participants in second treatment arm will receive methotrexate by subcutaneous
route. Baseline PASI, percentage of body surface area involvement(BSA) and DLQI will be
calculated for each patient at the start of study. Any systemic treatment will be stopped for
a duration of at least 5 times their half lives before the start of methotrexate in each
patient. The participants in first treatment arm will receive 0.3 mg/kg (upto a maximum of 25
mg/week ) of weekly oral methotrexate for 12 weeks or achievement of PASI 90 whichever is
earlier while the patients in second treatment arm will receive subcutaneous methotrexate at
0.3 mg/kg/week for the same duration. The participants will be followed at regular intervals
and monitored adequately for hematological, hepatotoxic and other adverse effects both
clinically and through laboratory investigations according to methotrexate consensus
guidelines during the treatment period. PASI, Body surface area (BSA) involvement and DLQI
will be assessed at each follow up visit and at the end of 12 weeks. The treatment will be
tapered at the rate of 5 mg/2 weeks and stopped after 12 weeks or achievement of PASI 90
whichever is earlier. The participants will be followed up for a period of 24 weeks after
stopping methotrexate to observe the relapse free period.
Monitoring of the adverse effects:
Participants will be monitored for documented side effects of methotrexate at each follow up
visit through history, clinical examination and laboratory investigations. The severity of
adverse effects will be documented and decision regarding continuation and discontinuation of
treatment will be taken as per the participant's will and guidelines.
Primary objectives
1. To compare the effectiveness of oral versus subcutaneous route of administration of
methotrexate in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.
2. To compare the safety profile of oral versus subcutaneous methotrexate.
Secondary objectives
1. Comparison between patients of both treatment arms with respect to time for achieving
PASI 90 or PASI 100
2. Comparison between patients of both treatment arms in percentage of patients who achieve
PASI 90 by the end of week 12 of treatment.
3. Comparison of improvement in DLQI between patients of both treatment arms.
4. Comparison of the relapse free period after stopping treatment.
Project schedule:
Screening and Patient recruitment: February 2018 to February 2019, Patient treatment and
follow up: March 2018 to August 2018, Compilation of data: September 2019, Statistical
analysis and Manuscript: October 2019.
Sample size and statistical analysis:
A total of 100 participants will be recruited in the study with 50 participants in each
treatment arm. Independent -sample t-test will be used to compare group means in percentage
decrease in PASI and percentage of patients developing adverse effects. Chi-square test will
be used for qualitative variables. P value less than 0.05 will be considered significant.
Ethical Justification:
Informed consent will be obtained from each participant prior to recruitment in both the
phases of study. Participants will be explained regarding both the arms of the study. The
participants will have the right to withdraw without having to give reasons for doing so.
Their refusal to participate in the study will not influence their future follow up with the
institution in any way.
Methotrexate is the most commonly used systemic drug both in its oral and subcutaneous forms
in the psoriasis clinic of investigator's institution and overall experience has suggested
that it is an effective and safe drug. Monitoring of participants will be done by standard
methotrexate consensus guidelines and treatment will be stopped if serious or intolerable
adverse effects develop.
The investigators have also gathered sufficient experience regarding the efficacy and safety
of subcutaneous route of methotrexate, especially in patients who have compliance issues or
who have failed oral route or developed intolerable gastrointestinal adverse effects.
This study will be the first randomized controlled trial comparing oral versus subcutaneous
route of administration of methotrexate in its efficacy in clearance of psoriasis and side
effect profile. This study will help in clarification of dilemma of clinicians regarding the
ideal route of administration of methotrexate in psoriasis with respect to effectiveness and
tolerability. Subcutaneous route of methotrexate administration if found having better
effectiveness and tolerability, can be tried first in patients who are failing or not
tolerating oral methotrexate before switching to other modalities like retinoids and
biologics. Subcutaneous methotrexate being cheaper than biologics and retinoids will also
decrease the financial burden on psoriasis patients. Cost-effectiveness of subcutaneous
methotrexate will be a major advantage for developing countries like India where most of the
patients cannot afford retinoids or biologics. The ease of administration, availability and
accessibility of subcutaneous methotrexate is also better than modalities like biologics and
phototherapy in developing countries , especially in remote areas.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03669757 -
Clinical Trial to Assess Safety, Tolerability and the Pharmacodynamic Effect of Different Concentrations of a New Anti-inflammatory Substance in Subjects With Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03614078 -
A Study of PRCL-02 in Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03584360 -
Role of Topical Treatments in the Modulation of Skin Microbiome in Psoriatic Skin
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04994951 -
Pilot Study of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Qing-Re-Liang-Xue Decoction) as Complementary Medicine for Psoriasis Vulgaris of Blood-heat Syndrome.
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02888236 -
LEO 32731 for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Vulgaris
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02533973 -
Long-term Treatment of Scalp Psoriasis With Xamiol® Gel in a Large Adult Chinese Population
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02193815 -
A 12 Day Study To Evaluate A Topical Drug To Treat Plaque Psoriasis
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02004847 -
Blue Light for Treating Psoriasis Vulgaris
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01946386 -
A Vasoconstriction Study With LEO 90100
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01443338 -
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Triptergium Wilfordii and Acitretin in Psoriasis Vulgaris - CHINA201002016-2
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01188928 -
LEO 80185 in the Treatment of Psoriasis Vulgaris on the Non-scalp Regions of the Body (Trunk and/or Limbs)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00764751 -
Efficacy and Safety of LEO 19123 Cream in the Treatment of Psoriasis Vulgaris
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00236171 -
Evaluation of Topical Antipsoriatics in the Psoriasis Plaque Test
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04541329 -
Predicting Inflammatory Skin Disease Response to IL-23 Blockade
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT06064084 -
Incretin Effect in Patients With Psoriasis and Controls
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06398106 -
Proactive TDM Versus Standard Use of Biologics in Psoriasis
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05892640 -
Low-Salt Diet Effect on Th17-Mediated Inflammation and Vascular Reactivity in Psoriasis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05390515 -
Psoriatic Immune Response to Tildrakizumab
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04950218 -
The Psoriasis Echo Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT05184348 -
Plexin B2 Gene Expression and Polymorphisms in Psoriasis
|
Phase 1 |