Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05519878
Other study ID # 22235
Secondary ID NCI-2022-0565822
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date November 29, 2022
Est. completion date May 25, 2027

Study information

Verified date December 2023
Source City of Hope Medical Center
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This clinical trial evaluates light therapy and occupational therapy in improving cancer related fatigue (CRF) patients with genitourinary cancers. Light therapy is a non-pharmacological and evidence-based intervention for managing fatigue in cancer patients. The use of light therapy can provide a low burden, inexpensive, and easy to disseminate intervention approach that can potentially have a larger impact on CRF. In addition, occupational therapy is a standard, but often underutilized, component of the multi-disciplinary approach to cancer care. Using the combination of light therapy and occupational therapy may be effective in CRF management.


Description:

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To evaluate patient's fatigue at post-intervention (3 months from baseline). SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: I. To evaluate whether the change (improvement) in fatigue as measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue tool, from pre-interventions to post interventions is significantly different between intervention groups in patients with genitourinary cancers. THIRD OBJECTIVE: I. To assess patient perceived changes in occupational performance as measured by the Canadian Occupational and Performance Measure (COPM) tool, in the occupational therapy (OT) group, compared to the control group in patients with genitourinary cancers. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 arms. ARM I (Bright white light [BWL]): Patients self-administer 30 minutes of light delivered via light glasses every morning for 3 months. Patients attend 6 follow up sessions to address any questions regarding the wearable light therapy glasses. ARM II (OT): Patients undergo 6 occupational therapist-led sessions over 60 minutes each. ARM III (BWL and OT): Patients self-administer 30 minutes of light delivered via light glasses every morning for 3 months. Patients attend 6 follow up sessions to address any questions regarding the wearable light therapy glasses and to complete the occupational therapist-led session over 60 minutes. ARM IV (CONTROL): Patients undergo routine treatment and usual follow up care with their medical oncologist. After completion of study, patients are follow-up for 3 months.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 224
Est. completion date May 25, 2027
Est. primary completion date May 25, 2027
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Aged 18 and over - Sufficiently fluent in English - On active treatment receiving systemic therapy (e.g., chemotherapy, immunotherapy, hormonal therapy, etc.) or radiotherapy - Patients with diagnosis of a genitourinary (GU) cancer (e.g., prostate, kidney, and bladder cancer) who have grade 1 or 2 fatigue based on physician assessment at the time of study entry - Clinician assessed prognosis of greater than or equal to six months - Willing and independently able to provide consent - Receive a pre-screen FACIT-Fatigue score of less than or equal to 30 Exclusion Criteria: - Severe sleep disorders (e.g. narcolepsy) - Eye Diseases which limit the ability of light to be processed (e.g. untreated cataracts, severe glaucoma, macular degeneration, blindness, pupil dilation problems or other retinal disorder) - Severe psychological impairment (e.g., bipolar disorder or manic episodes) - Current employment in night shift work - Previous use of light therapy to alleviate fatigue or depressive symptoms - Secondary cancer diagnosis within the past 5 years - Plans to travel across meridians during treatment - Pregnancy - Currently recovering from previous eye surgery within the past 6 months that causes eye irritation - Sensitivity to light, epilepsy, or a history of seizures

Study Design


Intervention

Other:
Best Practice
Undergo routine treatment and usual follow up care
Device:
Bright White Light Therapy
Undergo bright white therapy
Behavioral:
Occupational Therapy
Undergo occupational therapy
Other:
Questionnaire Administration
Complete questionnaires

Locations

Country Name City State
United States City of Hope Medical Center Duarte California

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
City of Hope Medical Center National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - (FACIT) The effects of light therapy and occupational therapy (OT) on FACIT will be evaluated by comparing light therapy to no-light therapy and comparing occupational therapy to no-occupational therapy. Analysis of variance test will be used for the factorial comparisons, with a two-sided statistical significance level (alpha = 0.05). The interaction between occupational therapy and light therapy will be explored (to understand whether the effect of light therapy [if any] on FACIT would change with occupational therapy and vice versa). The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT- fatigue scale) is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the better the Quality of Life (QoL). At baseline
Primary Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - (FACIT) The effects of light therapy and occupational therapy (OT) on FACIT will be evaluated by comparing light therapy to no-light therapy and comparing occupational therapy to no-occupational therapy. Analysis of variance test will be used for the factorial comparisons, with a two-sided statistical significance level (alpha = 0.05). The interaction between occupational therapy and light therapy will be explored (to understand whether the effect of light therapy [if any] on FACIT would change with occupational therapy and vice versa). The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT- fatigue scale) is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the better the Quality of Life (QoL). 6 weeks after baseline
Primary Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - (FACIT) The effects of light therapy and occupational therapy (OT) on FACIT will be evaluated by comparing light therapy to no-light therapy and comparing occupational therapy to no-occupational therapy. Analysis of variance test will be used for the factorial comparisons, with a two-sided statistical significance level (alpha = 0.05). The interaction between occupational therapy and light therapy will be explored (to understand whether the effect of light therapy [if any] on FACIT would change with occupational therapy and vice versa). The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT- fatigue scale) is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the better the Quality of Life (QoL). 3 months after baseline
Secondary Longitudinal change in FACIT-Fatigue scores Will evaluate whether the longitudinal change in FACIT-Fatigue scores, is significantly different between the intervention groups, including the control group. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT- fatigue scale) is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the better the QoL. Baseline
Secondary Longitudinal change in FACIT-Fatigue scores Will evaluate whether the longitudinal change in FACIT-Fatigue scores, is significantly different between the intervention groups, including the control group. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT- fatigue scale) is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the better the QoL. 6 weeks after baseline
Secondary Longitudinal change in FACIT-Fatigue scores Will evaluate whether the longitudinal change in FACIT-Fatigue scores, is significantly different between the intervention groups, including the control group. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT- fatigue scale) is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the better the QoL. 3 months after baseline
Secondary Self-reported occupational performance - Baseline Will determine if an OT-based intervention can improve self-reported occupational performance from preassessment to immediately after time point 2 (session 6) This outcome measure is Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Its administration involves four steps: (a) the patient is asked to identify occupations that are difficult for him or her in self-care, productivity and leisure; (b) the importance of these problem occupations is rated on a scale of 1-10 in terms of importance (1 = least important, 10 = most important); (c) patients' perceptions of performance and satisfaction with their five most important problems are rated on two separate 10-point scales (performance 1 = not able to do it, 10 = able to do it extremely well; satisfaction 1 = not satisfied at all, 10 = extremely satisfied) and finally (d) at reassessment both the performance and satisfaction ratings are repeated (and the change between assessment and reassessment is evaluated). Baseline
Secondary Self-reported occupational performance - session 6 Will determine if an OT-based intervention can improve self-reported occupational performance from preassessment to immediately after time point 2 (session 6) This outcome measure is Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Its administration involves four steps: (a) the patient is asked to identify occupations that are difficult for him or her in self-care, productivity and leisure; (b) the importance of these problem occupations is rated on a scale of 1-10 in terms of importance (1 = least important, 10 = most important); (c) patients' perceptions of performance and satisfaction with their five most important problems are rated on two separate 10-point scales (performance 1 = not able to do it, 10 = able to do it extremely well; satisfaction 1 = not satisfied at all, 10 = extremely satisfied) and finally (d) at reassessment both the performance and satisfaction ratings are repeated (and the change between assessment and reassessment is evaluated). 6 weeks after baseline
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT04457232 - Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT in Prostate Cancer With Histopathology Validation Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT03661437 - Systemic Light Exposure in Preventing Frailty in Older Patients With Prostate Cancer on Hormonal Therapy Early Phase 1
Completed NCT02337465 - KV-CBCT and Ultrasound Imaging in Guiding Radiation Therapy in Patients With Prostate, Liver, or Pancreatic Cancer N/A
Completed NCT03013413 - Ultrasound-Based Imaging Using the Aixplorer System in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer in Patients Undergoing Biopsy N/A
Recruiting NCT06037863 - Evaluation of the Impact of Empty Versus Full Bladder in Patients With Prostate Cancer, RELIEF Trial N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03580499 - Vitamin B6 in Reducing Hot Flashes in Participants With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Antiandrogen Therapy N/A
Completed NCT03326440 - Virtual Environment Radiotherapy to Improve Patients' Compliance to Radiotherapy (RT) in Prostate Cancer N/A
Recruiting NCT04597359 - To Evaluate if Green Tea Can be Effective in Reducing the Progression of Prostate Cancer in Men on Close Monitoring Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT03263650 - Study of Olaparib Maintenance Following Cabazitaxel-Carbo in Men With AVPC Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04600336 - Testing the Effects of Oxybutynin for the Treatment of Hot Flashes in Men Receiving Hormone Therapy for Prostate Cancer Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04299620 - Micro-Ultrasound for the Detection and Localization of Prostate Cancer Tumors in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy N/A
Completed NCT04976257 - Pharmacokinetics of IA and IV Ga68-PSMA-11 Infusion Early Phase 1
Completed NCT02957981 - The Genetic Education for Men Trial: Web-Based Education vs. Standard Care N/A
Withdrawn NCT03408561 - Social Media Listening in Improving Clinical Trial Recruitment in Patients With Cancer N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06347809 - DNA Methylation in Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate: Analysis of Validated Biomarkers in Urine
Enrolling by invitation NCT04254133 - Genetic Information to Inform Treatment and Screening for Prostate Cancer, GIFTS Study
Recruiting NCT02994758 - Development of Diagnostics and Treatment of Urological Cancers N/A
Completed NCT01497431 - Se-Methyl-Seleno-L-Cysteine or Selenomethionine in Preventing Prostate Cancer in Healthy Participants Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT00002540 - Screening for Prostate Cancer in Older Patients (PLCO Screening Trial) N/A
Completed NCT03101046 - Treatment of Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients According to Circulating Tumor Cells Kinetic Phase 2