View clinical trials related to Prostate Biopsy.
Filter by:The goal of this cohort study is to investigate multiparametric ultrasound versus multiparametric MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer detection in patients scheduled for initial biopsy. The main questions it aims to answer are: - whether the clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate of multiparametric ultrasound is comparable to multiparametric MRI - the any cancer detection of multiparametric ultrasound versus multiparametric MRI Participants will undergo multiparametric ultrasound and multiparametric MRI before prostate biopsy. In case of suspicious findings on ultrasound or MRI, they will undergo combined systematic biopsy and targeted biopsy. In case of nonsuspicious imaging finding, they will undergo systematic biopsy alone.
This study is set up as a phase I prospective, single center, device interventional pilot study carried in office setting under local anesthesia. It will assess the tolerance and safety of target fusion ablation of prostate cancer tumors using Laser Induced Thermal Therapy (TFA-LITT) guided by fusion imaging in men 50 to 80 years of age with low to intermediate risk prostate cancer Prostate Cancer is currently managed with in a discrete fashion where patients either enroll in active surveillance protocols (No intervention) or undergo full intervention via whole gland treatments - most commonly radical surgery or radiation. These treatments have not shown definitive gains in all cause survival and not uncommonly harbor undesirable adverse effects, most notably: impotency and incontinence. Such events elicit significant and noticeable changes on a male lifestyle and for most prostate cancer tumors are considered overtreatment. This study aims to evaluate the use of TFA-LITT in the office setting under local anesthesia - greatly decreasing patient perioperative surgical risk - focused on the organ sparing cancer lesion ablation, where organ function is preserved. The fundamental objective is to determine the tolerance and safety of TFA-LITT in men with low to intermediate risk prostate cancer, successful performed in the outpatient office-based setting under local anesthesia directed by fusion imaging. Secondary objectives include: 1-Biopsy proven cancer control of ablated areas 12 months after procedure; 2-Uroflowmetry and urinary function Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) at one, three, six, nine and 12 months; 3- Sexual function Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) at one, three, six, nine and 12 months; 4- MRI changes of ablated area one, three and 12 months after TFA-LITT; 5- Absence or presence of ejaculation after TFA-LITT.
This is an observational, open, single-arm, prospective, staged entry（based on Fleming's Group-Sequential Design） clinical study The Goal is to evaluate the feasibility and clinical value of direct robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy without prostate biopsy in patients with high clinical suspicion of prostate cancer based on a prostate MRI PI-RADS score of ≥4 and the PSMA PET/CT positive criteria. The Primary endpoint is positive pathological diagnosis of prostate cancer after direct radical prostatectomy without prostate biopsy. The question addressed is whether the feasibility of biopsy-free radical prostatectomy could be scientifically and rationally derived based on Fleming's Group-Sequential design.
The purpose of this research is to evaluate a new needle guide grid utilizing Clear Guide SCENERGY - MR with a grid embedded with VisiMARKER II to autoregister and target the prostate aiding in needle placement positioning. The proceduralist can utilize this technology to find the best needle path to target within the pelvis.
Many studies have been conducted in the literature to manage pain and anxiety levels for patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy. In addition to the periprostatic block application recommended in the guidelines of the European Association of Urology, there are studies showing that TENS application or music applications will make an additional contribution.However, there is no study comparing the effect of TENS and music.
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the rate of perioperative infection complications in transperineal prostate biopsy between the group that receives prophylactic antibiotic and the group that receives placebo. The types of infection studied included bacteriuria, urinary tract infection (UTI), UTI with fever (febrile UTI), and sepsis. This study hypothesized that the administration of prophylactic antibiotics during transperineal prostate biopsy would result in lower rates of perioperative infection complications.
Men aged over 18 having a first or second diagnostic prostate biopsy at the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust or Epsom General Hospital may be invited to take part in one to one interview within 6 months of having the procedure done to talk about their experience
Prostate biopsy is indicated in patients with suspected prostate cancer and has been traditionally performed through the rectum using antibiotic prophylaxis. Increasing antibiotic resistance of intestinal bacteria is causing a growing number of patients to get post-biopsy infections. Sepsis rate after transrectal biopsies is approximately 4-10%. To reduce the risk of post-biopsy infections, transperineal approach in general anesthesia and antibiotic prophylaxis has been used. The investigators at Oslo University Hospital Aker developed MRI -TURS elastic image fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy technique in local anesthesia and Bactrim prophylaxis as outpatient procedure. The investigators found 0.4% post-biopsy infection rate. Afterwards a pilot study using the same biopsy technique however without antibiotic prophylaxis was realized in 90 patients. None of these subjects experienced infection. The investigators wish to perform a prospective randomized trial of antibiotic prophylaxis versus none before transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion guided prostate biopsy in local anesthesia in outpatient clinic.
The main purpose of this study is to compare the infectious outcomes of intrarectal povidone-iodine cleansing plus formalin disinfection of needle tip during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. The secondary objective is to evaluate predictive factors of infectious complications after prostate biopsy. Data will be prospectively collected from patients who will undergo prostate biopsy in a single high volume urology center. The patients will be randomized to two different groups: group A - rectal cleansing and disinfection of the needle tip vs group B - controls.
In comparison with transrectal prostate biopsy, transperineal prostate biopsy has the advantage of better sampling from the anterior area, low risk of infection, and no rectal bleeding. The main problems associated with the transperineal method are pain control and additional general or spinal anesthesia. Three types of anesthesia have been reported for transperineal prostate biopsy: (1) spinal anesthesia; (2) general anesthesia; and (3) local anesthesia. From the viewpoint of patient selection (general anesthesia is contraindicated in some patients) and medical cost, local anesthesia is the most suitable choice for prostate biopsy. Periprostatic block is the standard method of local anesthesia for this procedure. However, periprostatic block is insufficient for transperineal prostate biopsy due to high pain sensitivity in this region. A number of new methods to eliminate pain have been reported, including (1) periapical triangle (PAT) block, (2) paraprostatic plus sexual nerve block, and (3) periprostatic block plus pudendal block.However, there is no anatomical basis for some of these methods, and there have been no randomized controlled trials to evaluate their effectiveness, and some methods are technically difficult to learn. In the previous perineal nerve autopsy, we found that there are two branches leading into the prostate and anterior lateral prostatic tissue, which is the main site of puncture pain. There is a fixed position where the two branches appear. Therefore, this anatomical position block may be a useful site for local anesthesia. We named this location the 'transperineal prostate biopsy local anesthesia switch' (abbreviated as TPA switch). In order to validate its effect, we organized this clinical trail.