View clinical trials related to Professional Stress.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is identify the psychological impact of the coronavirus-19 pandemic on professionals in residential care facilities for old people and home help professionals in New-Aquitaine by : 1. Large-scale screening for the prevalence of mental health disorders among staff. 2. Identification of vulnerability and resilience factors. 3. Improving access to early care for affected professionals.
The objective of this study is to compare psychological distress and needs of nurses in ICU before and during coronavirus pandemic.
Researchers are trying to determine if individualized professional coaching improves physicians' sense of well-being and job satisfaction.
Evidence-based practice (EBP) has improved patient health outcomes. The work environment of nurses is a key element to improving the quality of care and to facilitate EBP, while also improving health outcomes. The CCEC® / BPSO® program consists of the implementation of Good Practice Guides in health organizations in the Spanish territory, and is carried out through a training and participatory methodology, actively involving nurses in the process. The present study tries to know if in the health organizations where the CCEC® / BPSO® program has been implemented, the perception of the nurses' working environment has improved, as well as their attitude towards evidence-based practice, with respect to organizations where this program has not been implemented.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a curriculum about professionalism on stress response during a critical situation in anesthesiology residents. Residents in anesthesiology will complete a training program on professionalism during their first postgraduate year. They will go through a standardized simulated scenario where they have to manage an intra-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest and then meet the patient's family. Stress response will be assessed and compared to a control group that did not receive the training program.
I. Main outcome Decrease of the stress evaluated 6 months after training. Stress is defined as the presence of job strain as defined by Karasek. II. Main secondary outcomes - ICU nurses stress at one year - Burnout - Intent-to-leave the ICU - Quality of life III. Design Prospective, randomized, open study comparing 2 groups of ICU nurses: Simulation group and Control group Nurses from 9 different adult ICUs will be included. Stratification by ICU will be done (to take into account differences between the ICUs regarding organization, activity, patients…). This study is observational because nurses can participate to this training when they want. The fact that nurses are in control group delays their participation to this training but does not forbid them to particpate. The nurses from control group will participate to training at the end of study. IV. Specific measures Control group: none Simulation group: 5-day specific training with dedicated scenario done by an ICU expert simulation team V. Study duration 48 months VI. Ethical aspects - Reglementary concerns - Study accepted by the Comité Consultatif sur le Traitement de l'Information en matière de Recherche dans le domaine de la Santé (CCTIRS) and by the Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés (CNIL) - Information to the participants prior inclusion VII. Study population Job strain evaluated in a French study was 59% . The same rate was observed in a survey done in our institution (Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille). We therefore hypothesized that the intervention (simulation) should be able to reduce the job strain from 59% to 45% of the participants. With a power of 80% and a risk a of 5%, this study needs to include 185 patients per arm. To take into account few participants who will not complete the study, we aimed to include a total of 400 ICU nurses. VIII Results An interim analysis will be performed after 200 inclusions