View clinical trials related to Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Filter by:Summary from initial protocol Goal: Validation of the HA (hydroxylapatite) coated SL-PLUS™ stem within an observation study Study design: prospective, multicenter, observational, non-comparative study Study population: 240 consecutive cases (HA-coated implants), 60 cases per study site Intervention (if applicable): Implantation of a total hip endoprosthesis Main goals/endpoints: Radiological: radiolucent lines, osteolysis, hypo- and hypertrophy of the cortex, loosening of the implant or migration; clinical: Harris Hip Score, implant-related complications, revisions; patient questionnaires HOOS and EQ-5D Type and extent of the risks associated with the study participation as well as benefits for the patient: All patients will benefit from the hip prostheses without exception. There are no increased risks for the patients participating in the study compared to patients who do not participate. Normal, necessary follow-up exams will be performed over the course of 10 years. These follow-up exams will then be quantitatively evaluated within the scope of the study in accordance with a standardized protocol. Accordingly, the benefit for the patients from the participation in the study is currently not yet foreseeable.
Summary from initial protocol Goal: Validation of the HA (hydroxylapatite) coated SLPLUS ™ MIA stem within an observation study Study design: prospective, multicenter, observational, noncomparative study Study population: 300 consecutive cases (HA-coated implants), 60 cases per study site. Intervention (if applicable): Implantation of a total hip endoprosthesis Main goals/endpoints: Radiological: radiolucent lines, osteolysis, hypo- and hypertrophy of the cortex, loosening of the implant or migration. Clinical: Harris Hip Score, HOOS Score, EQ-5D, implant-related complications, revisions Type and extent of the risks associated with the study participation as well as benefits for the patient: All patients will benefit from the hip prostheses without exception. There are no increased risks for the patients participating in the study compared to patients who do not participate. Normal, necessary follow-up exams will be performed over the course of 10 years. In addition, study patients are asked to provide information on their general state of health and the condition of their hip in two questionnaires. These clinical and radiological follow-up exams will then be quantitatively evaluated within the scope of the study in accordance with a standardized protocol. Accordingly, the direct benefit for the patients from the participation in the study is currently not yet foreseeable.
The purpose of this study is to learn if using a suprainguinal fascia iliaca (SIFI) injection technique (also called a "nerve block") that numbs the nerves going to the side and front of the upper leg will improve pain control after surgery. The SIFI technique uses a numbing solution (local anesthetics) that is injected next to nerves in the hip to reduce pain. This block may affect movement in the leg and make the legs weak. The amount of leg weakness is not known and assessment of this will be included in the study. Many institutions use the SIFI block for patients having total hip replacements, with the hope of providing good pain relief combined with improved mobility after surgery.