Preterm Birth Clinical Trial
— PCP002Official title:
A Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled, Multi-Center Study on the Efficacy of a Sustained Release Progesterone Cerclage Cervical Pessary at Doses of 6.3 g or 7.7 g for the Prevention of Preterm Birth and a Maximum Duration of 20 Weeks.
Verified date | October 2018 |
Source | Grünenthal GmbH |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Assess the efficacy of 2 Cervical Pessaries containing 6.3 g and 7.7 g micronized progesterone for the prevention of preterm delivery, established through spontaneous birth before gestation weeks 32 (31 weeks and 6 days) and 34 (33 weeks and 6 days), when the pessary is inserted during weeks 16th and 24th and removed at 36 weeks and 6 days in pregnant women at high risk of premature birth.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 271 |
Est. completion date | March 13, 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | March 13, 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Women with a single pregnancy and a cervical length of 10 mm - 25 mm between 16 and 24 weeks of gestation, without any previous factors. - Women with a single pregnancy with 10 mm or more cervical length between 16 and 24 weeks of gestation, and pre-existing risk factors risk factors for preterm birth: - Previous preterm birth before week 35. - Previous rupture of membranes before week 35 Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnancies with: - Major fetal abnormalities, such as lethal malformations or malformations requiring pre- or post-natal surgery; and fetal death before inclusion into the study. - History of rupture of membranes or prophylactic cerclage before study entry. - Cervical or vaginal injuries prior to insertion of the pessary (e.g., cervical erosion secondary to trauma, infection, or carcinoma; vesicovaginal or rectovaginal fistulas). - Unconscious, severely ill or mentally disabled patients, or under 16 years of age. - Patients for whom use of progesterone is contraindicated. - Patients with history of thrombosis. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Chile | Complejo Asistencial Dr. Sótero del Río (CASR) | Santiago | |
Chile | Unidad de Alto Riesgo Obstétrico y Medicina Perinatal y en el Centro Perinatal Oriente (CERPO), Hospital Santiago Oriente, Dr. Luis Tisné Brousse | Santiago | |
Chile | Universidad de Chile, Hospital Barros Luco | Santiago | |
Chile | Universidad de Chile, Hospital Clínico San Borja Arriarán | Santiago |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Grünenthal GmbH | Laboratorios Andromaco S.A. |
Chile,
Arabin B, Halbesma JR, Vork F, Hübener M, van Eyck J. Is treatment with vaginal pessaries an option in patients with a sonographically detected short cervix? J Perinat Med. 2003;31(2):122-33. — View Citation
Berghella V. Novel developments on cervical length screening and progesterone for preventing preterm birth. BJOG. 2009 Jan;116(2):182-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02008.x. Review. — View Citation
Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Cincotta R, Flenady V, Robinson JS. Progesterone supplementation for preventing preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Jun;84(6):526-33. Review. — View Citation
Goya M, Pratcorona L, Merced C, Rodó C, Valle L, Romero A, Juan M, Rodríguez A, Muñoz B, Santacruz B, Bello-Muñoz JC, Llurba E, Higueras T, Cabero L, Carreras E; Pesario Cervical para Evitar Prematuridad (PECEP) Trial Group. Cervical pessary in pregnant women with a short cervix (PECEP): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 May 12;379(9828):1800-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60030-0. Epub 2012 Apr 3. Erratum in: Lancet. 2012 May 12;379(9828):1790. — View Citation
Jayasooriya GS, Lamont RF. The use of progesterone and other progestational agents to prevent spontaneous preterm labour and preterm birth. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009 Apr;10(6):1007-16. doi: 10.1517/14656560902851403 . Review. — View Citation
Newcomer J. Pessaries for the treatment of incompetent cervix and premature delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2000 Jul;55(7):443-8. Review. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Participants Not Giving Birth Before Week 32 and Week 34 of Gestation | To assess the efficacy of Cerclage Pessaries containing 6.3 g and 7.7 g micronized progesterone for the prevention of preterm delivery, established through spontaneous parturition before gestation weeks 32 (31 weeks and 6 days) and 34 (33 weeks and 6 days), when the pessary is inserted between weeks 16 and 24 and removed at 36 weeks and 6 days in pregnant women at high risk of premature delivery. For the purpose of this analysis, pregnancies were no longer considered as high risk for the event if delivery occurred at week 34 of gestation and beyond. Gestational age was determined by the last menstruation date and were confirmed by measurement of the craniocaudal length obtained in the first trimester ultrasound, or by measurement of the cephalic circumference in the second trimester ultrasound predominating the actual date of the last menstrual period. The number of participants not giving birth before 32 weeks and 34 weeks are reported. |
Up to 36 weeks of gestational age | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Premature Rupture of Membranes | A participant with premature rupture of membrane typically recalls a sudden gush of fluid loss from the vagina, or steady loss of small amounts of fluid. Participants who reported vaginal discharge were examined by a physician. | Up to 36 weeks of gestational age | |
Secondary | Anatomical Feature: Length of the Uterine Cervix | During the pregnancy the length of the uterine cervix will be assessed. The rational is that premature birth is associated with uterine cervix shortening. The length of the cervix was determined using ultrasound examination. A positive change from baseline indicates a positive development, i.e. less likely to result in a preterm birth. The comparison between premature an normal birth initially planned by the protocol was not analyzed. | Up to 36 weeks of gestational age. Results are reported for all assessments from baseline through final visit, for a total of 8 visits, and for up to 36 weeks of gestational age. | |
Secondary | Anatomical Feature: Position of the Uterine Cervix | During the pregnancy the position of the uterine cervix will be assessed. The rational being that premature birth is associated with uterine cervix positioning. The position of the cervix was determined using transvaginal ultrasound examination. In the change from baseline visit a positive value change indicated that the investigator believed that the position of the cervix changed in a positive manner to facilitate a term birth. The comparison between premature an normal birth initially planned by the protocol was not analyzed. The results reported are the degrees of the cervix position relative to the longitudinal axis of the uterus. | Up to 36 weeks of gestational age. Results are reported for all assessments from baseline through final visit, for a total of 8 visits, and for up to 36 weeks of gestational age. | |
Secondary | Acceptability and Tolerance of Use of the Cerclage Pessary | A questionnaire was planned to be used to compare acceptability and tolerance in the insertion, during pregnancy and during the extraction of Cerclage Pessary. Data from this questionnaire was not collected. |
Up to 36 weeks of gestational age | |
Secondary | Number of Adverse Events Related With the Use of Treatment | The number of adverse events reported were analyzed as being related with the treatment as well as for unexpectedness. | Up to 36 weeks of gestational age |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05934318 -
L-ArGinine to pRevent advErse prEgnancy Outcomes (AGREE)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05502510 -
Assessing the Effectiveness and Efficacy of the MyHealthyPregnancy Application
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03418012 -
Prevention of sPTB With Early Cervical Pessary Treatment in Women at High Risk for PTB
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03418311 -
Cervical Pessary Treatment for Prevention of s PTB in Twin Pregnancies on Children`s Long-Term Outcome
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02993744 -
Maternal Inflammatory Parameters Within Routine Treatment With Betamethasone
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02673216 -
Infection and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome
|
||
Completed |
NCT01683565 -
Preemie Tots: A Pilot Study to Understand the Effects of Prematurity in Toddlerhood
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01412931 -
Protein and Ultrasound Indicators of Preterm Birth
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01460576 -
Improving Prematurity-Related Respiratory Outcomes at Vanderbilt
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02606058 -
The Australian Placental Transfusion Study (APTS): Should Very Pre Term Babies Receive a Placental Blood Transfusion at Birth Via Deferring Cord Clamping Versus Standard Cord Clamping Procedures?
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03715530 -
Use of Placental Alpha Microglobulin-1(PAMG-1) to Diagnose Premature Rupture of Membranes in Pregnant Women
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00422526 -
Progesterone for Prevention of Preterm Birth in Women With Short Cervix: Randomized Controlled Trial
|
Phase 3 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04251260 -
Effectiveness of Positioning in Preterm Neonates
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03668860 -
India Dexamethasone and Betamethasone
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03638037 -
Correlation Between Maternal Vitamin D Level And Preterm Birth
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03992534 -
The FLIP-1 Study: Vaginal Lactobacillus Supplementation in Women at High Risk of Preterm Birth
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03144141 -
Association Between EHG and Risk of Preterm Delivery in Women Hospitalized for Threatened Premature Delivery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05210985 -
Examination of the Relationship Between Home Affordances With Development
|
||
Completed |
NCT04811742 -
Effect of Immersion Bathing and Showering Applications on Comfort Level and Physiological Parameters of Newborn
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04021654 -
What is the Future of Vulnerable New-borns
|