View clinical trials related to Preterm Birth.
Filter by:Investigation of the relationship between maternal serum vasohibin-1, vasohibin-2, cardiotrophin -1 and endocan concentrations at the 11th and 14th weeks of gestation and adverse perinatal outcomes.
An Exploratory Randomized double-arm controlled trial to evaluate the immunomodulatory effect of low versus high dose of Alveofact with or without Budesonide.
This study will investigate stress that parents of children admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) experience. Investigation of a novel intervention of using bilateral alternating stimulation to reduce parental stress and anxiety and increase bonding/attachment in NICU. Evaluate parental stress and feelings of bonding using surveys before and after the intervention. Intervention will be done at neonate's bedside while admitted to the NICU. Vital sign data will be collected as a marker of parent and neonate's stress response during the intervention.
The aim of the study is to assess mental and somatic symptoms of preterm born children at the ages of 2, 5 and 10 by a multidisciplinary team and to evaluate an app that screens for these symptoms. Furthermore, there will be an evaluation of an intervention by our multidisciplinary team that provides recommendations for further treatment and diagnostic procedures of the children.
Background: In premature babies, many organ systems are not fully grown and developed, including the lungs and respiratory muscles, so they will need breathing support to help them to breathe by preventing their tiny air sacs to collapse. This support commonly done by CPAP and Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) therapy by giving some pressure and oxygen to their lungs through an interface placed on their noses. Both (CPAP and NIPPV) can be used as a support modality for respiratory distress syndrome, apnea of prematurity, and providing breathing support after extubation from the full mechanical breathing support. The CPAP supports the baby's immature lungs by delivering constant pressure to keep their lungs and breathing well supported. Whereas the NIPPV will use constant pressure in the background (similar to CPAP), and on top, it will give extra intermittent puffs at regular intervals to support the baby's breathing. The NIPPV is the most common choice by the clinicians when the traditional CPAP is no longer effective, to avoid the full mechanical breathing support and to protect the developing lungs. Studies suggested that NIPPV is better than the traditional CPAP in reducing the need of the baby to need full mechanical breathing support. This might be because the investigators tend to use lower pressures with CPAP (5-8 cmH2O) compared to relatively higher pressures with NIPPV. More recently, clinicians showed the safety of using equivalent higher CPAP pressures (>9 cmH2O) to what the investigators use in the NIPPV in preterm babies. One way to measure the support that the investigators are giving to the patient with the different devices is to measure the diaphragm activity, which the investigators call the Edi signal, using a special feeding catheter and a specific machine to measure it. The catheter is placed and used as a routine feeding tube but has sensors at the end to measure this Edi signal. One opening of the tube will be connected to a computer to record the Edi signals. The other opening of the tube will be used for feeding.
The goal is to demonstrate the relationship of the circulating pool of T-regulatory lymphocytes in the mother's peripheral blood with populations in the placentas and to compare with controls, what is the difference in the expression of individual regulatory molecules of T-regulatory lymphocytes according to new paradigms. The proportional and functional characteristics of T-regulatory lymphocytes will be correlated with the composition of the intestinal and vaginal microbiota.
The goal of this MONAS Study is to learn about comprehensive monitoring and nutritional intervention among pregnant women in order to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Are comprehensive monitoring and nutritional intervention among pregnant women can improve maternal outcomes (maternal death, preterm labour, preeclampsia, intrauterine infection, and bleeding during pregnancy and delivery) compared to standard maternal health services? 2. Are comprehensive monitoring and nutritional intervention among pregnant women can improve neonatal outcomes (neonatal death, low birth weight, intrauterine growth restriction, and neonatal asphyxia) compared to standard maternal health services? Participants in the intervention group will receive: - Fetomaternal ultrasound examination each trimester - Complete laboratory examination for nutritional panel (complete blood count with reticulocyte profile and iron profile, vitamin D level, zinc level, fatty acid profile, electrophoresis for Thalassemia) as an addition to standard maternal routine laboratory examination - Supplements: multivitamin, minerals, vitamin D, fatty acid - Intervention regarding any abnormal results of nutritional panel - All standard maternal health services according to Indonesian Ministry of Health protocol Participants in the control group will receive: - All standard maternal health services according to Indonesian Ministry of Health protocol
Improving pregnancy outcome is essential in improving health of both parents and their offspring during the life course. Preterm birth (PTB) occurs in 10-15% of all pregnancies, is the leading cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity {Goldenberg, 2008}, has long-term adverse consequences for postnatal health {Huddy, 2001} and is a burden for health care expenditure. In order to improve neonatal outcome, antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) are routinely administered to women at risk for preterm delivery before 34 weeks of pregnancy. {Jobe, 2018;Roberts, 2017;Travers, 2018} However, the current, worldwide standard of care, for the use of ACS is still based on animal experiments performed in the 1970's. {Liggins, 1969} Although ACS treatment to improve neonatal outcome was clinically introduced in the 70's, still only two dosing regimens are used, neither of which have been investigated, re-evaluated or refined to determine the optimal doses or treatment interval. With the current health care approach of personalized medicine in mind, the same universal approach for everybody, independent of gestational age, number of fetus, maternal weight or comorbidity one dose does not fit all since it often has not the desired effect. Due to the lack of optimization of the above mentioned synthetic corticosteroid drug regimens {Kemp, 2019}, significant gaps in knowledge exist. An important aspect to set up, investigate and understand dosing and also dosing interval experiments, is knowledge of the maternal individual pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of the drug of interest during pregnancy.
This is an observational study of pregnant persons in threatened labor. The study device will record electromyography signals, then the signals will be examined to determine who is in true labor and who is in threatened labor. The two goals are: - To establish the thresholds for the Contraction Synchronization Index (CSI) and the False Labor Index (FSI) to be used by the Labor Status Monitor to diagnose in-Labor or Not-in-Labor for preterm patients with threatened labor - To obtain feedback from subjects and providers to assist with enhancing patient comfort and provider training.
This is a prospective, controlled randomized study designed to compare the effects of two methods of skin-to-skin positioning of preterm infants: the prone positioning method currently used (according to the World Health Organization's recommendations) and the recent "sustained diagonal flexion" method (SDF) on the daily duration of skin-to-skin contact.