View clinical trials related to Pressure Ulcer.
Filter by:Sleep disorders affect 40% of the adult population each year and are often associated with morbidity and mortality (Kripke et al., 2002; F.-Z. Low et al., 2017). Sleep quality plays a vital role in the overall quality of our lives. Therefore, a good sleep helps to create a quality life rhythm. A quality sleep reduces fatigue and increases physical regeneration (Khaleghipour et al., 2015). Poor sleep quality is due to various environmental factors such as temperature, light, noise and bed quality (Lei et al., 2009). It has been reported that 7% of sleep problems are caused by inappropriate mattresses that affect the load on the spine during sleep (F. Z. Low et al., 2017). Body contact pressure is a measure of the distribution of body weight across the body surface in contact with the mattress. A well-designed mattress usually has the ability to minimize high pressure points applied to the body. However, if the bed is not suitable for the person, pressure sores may develop in the body parts where pressure is intense (Cullum et al., 2004). The areas most affected by high pressure are usually the hips, shoulders and back, which can affect sleep quality and result in drowsiness or body stiffness throughout the day (Jacobson et al., 2002). A recent study by Bae and Ko compared the bed positions of hospital beds and found that a head-to-foot angle of 30° is the best position to reduce the likelihood of decubitus ulcers occurring in patients in high-pressure risk areas (Bae & Ko, 2013). In the light of previous studies, it has been observed that there is no study comparing many bed types designed using different materials for individual-specific postures. Biomechanical comparison of these bedding materials in individuals with different posture types and sleeping in different sleeping positions will allow us to provide new insights into their pressure distribution abilities. The aim of this study is to measure the effect of mattresses made of different mattress materials on body contact pressure profiles in individuals with different postures in various sleeping positions. It will be evaluated using maximum body pressure and pressure distribution as outcome measures.
With the development of technology in medicine, more medical instruments are used in the treatment of diseases. Although the use of these instruments provides great benefits for the patients, it can also cause some complications.One of the most important of these complications is pressure ulcer.Some care and evaluation are needed to prevent these complications.This study aims to prevent pressure ulcers with a care package for patients with high risk scores.
This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 3-arm, single-center, phase IIa, parallel study to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of topically applied 2.5%, 5% GM-XANTHO plus standard of care in patients with stage II or stage III pressure ulcer.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, intensive care units (ICUs) across the country have been inundated with increasing numbers of COVID patients. Hypoxic patients in ICU require mechanical ventilation and this can be improved by proning these patients to improve oxygenation and prevent ventilator-induced lung injury. Standard practice is to use standard hospital pillows to support the pelvis and chest of the patient while they are proned. These pillows do not provide much support to the patients and often need to be adjusted due to the patient 'sinking' into them. Prolonged pronation also leads to pressure sores in these anatomical locations which burden the Trust financially and also cause distress to patients. A new proning pillow system was developed by Dr Sashika Selladurai and manufactured for the ICU in Aintree hospital which is made from polyurethane memory foam designed to relieve pressure on the patients and prevent pressure sores that often occur during prolonged proning. The pillow system is also designed to withstand the load of heavier patients and reduce the risk of 'sinking' into the pillows when proned for long periods of time. The aim of the study is to compare the performance of the new proning pillow system with standard pillows, particularly in relation to the risk of pressure sores, by evaluating differences in chest and pelvis interface pressures between the two pillow types. This will be done by having healthy NHS staff lie on the pillows in the prone position for a short period of time while recording the pressure distribution on the pillows using pressure mats placed between them and the pillows. This will help understand the relative risk of pressure sores developing when the new pillow system is used. It is hypothesised that the new pillow system does not increase the risk of pressure sores developing. The new proning pillow system is a Class 1 CE marked medical device. The proning pillow system consists of a chest pillow and a pelvis pillow made from memory foam designed to reduce contact pressures and peak interface pressures in patients and allow patients to be placed in neutral position for ventilation.
The study objectives will be: Primary objectives: 1. To determine the effects on oxygenation and tissue perfusion of applying HFA (Hyperoxygenated Fatty Acids) or EVOO (Extra Virgin Olive Oil) to the heels of healthy subjects, evaluating the maximum variation of oxygenation and flow when the heels are subjected to pressure. 2. To determine the levels of tissue oxygenation and perfusion associated with the appearance of blanching erythema in the heels of acute hospitalised patients and patients admitted to social health centers for the elderly. Secondary objectives: 1. To determine whether there are differences in oxygenation and peripheral tissue perfusion between heels to which HFA vs. EVOO is applied. 2. To evaluate the possible progressive loss of the efficacy of HFA and EVOO in terms of tissue oxygenation and perfusion in patients who are bedridden for extended periods. Methodology: Experimental study in two phases: preclinical and clinical. Phase 1 with healthy subjects, with a randomized and open design, with an intrasubject control group. Phase 2 with hospitalized subjects and patients admitted to social health centers for the elderly, with a randomized and open design, with an intrasubject control group.
The main purpose of this exploratory clinical investigation is to study the binding of bacteria and fungi from hard-to-heal wounds to the DACC-coated dressings.
the study aims at examining the relation between the prevalence and risk factors of pressure ulcers among hospitalized patients in Beni Suef governorate of Egypt
This study will evaluate a topical bacteriophage therapy product (BACTELIDE) as an adjunct to standard therapy for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers colonized with S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, or K. pneumoniae species. This study will compare the safety and efficacy of BACTELIDE in conjunction with standard of care (SOC) versus a placebo in conjunction with standard of care.
During typical daily activity, people with established spinal cord injury perform significantly fewer pressure-relief maneuvers than the recommended frequency while overestimating their adherence on recall surveys of pressure relief activity. The rate of pressure ulcer recurrence in individuals with a prior ulcer is 44% in those with surgical repair and as high as 75% in those with non-surgical healing indicating that increased attention to pressure relief is critical for these individuals.This study will evaluate the efficacy of a wheelchair sensor and app-based biofeedback for establishing healthy self-management behaviors (pressure relief maneuvers and daily physical activity). Investigators will enroll 50 participants with paraplegia from spinal cord injury who use a manual wheelchair for mobility and have a history of pressure ulcer that has healed or is six months post-surgical repair. Participants will be randomized into one of two groups: an intervention group that will receive an education intervention and the proposed technology to be used for one year, and a control group that will receive only the education intervention. The primary outcome will be pressure ulcer occurrence over one year. Investigators hypothesize that participants receiving the intervention of biofeedback on their pressure relief activity will have a lower recurrence of pressure ulcer than the education only control group. Secondary outcomes include depressive symptoms, self-efficacy, participation and satisfaction with life. Investigators hypothesize that increasing physical activity will reduce depressive symptoms and improve participation and satisfaction with life.
In surgical patients, prevention of pressure injury is a challenge because of the high risk for multiple comorbid conditions, hemodynamic instability, and long duration of immobility. The objectives of our study is to compare the difference in incidence rates of sacral pressure injury in surgical patients with supine position more than 3 hours between those treated with usual preventive care and a sacral foam pad versus a control group receiving usual care.