View clinical trials related to Pressure Area.
Filter by:Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis; by problem of stabilty causes postural changes, because of this reason patient with scoliosis needs to assesment by risk of balance. Postural adjustments are required, both in a static stance and during walking. Insoles from foot orthoses support better postural balance and control. It has been reported that approximately 87% of scoliosis patients have pelvic asymmetry, and patients with scoliosis with a Cobb angle of 15⁰ or more have balance problems in their feet. Foot orthoses (FO) correct pelvic asymmetry and reduce lower extremity joint angles during walking. In the literature, although there are studies such as balance assessment and plantar pressure analysis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients, there are not enough studies on the effect of insoles used in scoliosis patients, and it has been observed that there is no study on the effect of insoles on treatment in patients using spinal orthosis. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of insoles on the treatment of scoliosis patients using Chêneau type spinal orthosis. In the study; The effect of insoles on patients with 20-45⁰ curvature, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and using Chêneau type spinal orthosis; It was planned to investigate the groups using and not using insoles at the beginning of the treatment and after 3 months of follow-up by comparing the results of Cobb angle measurement, functional capacity assessment test, quality of life assessment test, balance test and plantar pressure analysis.
MS patients were randomly divided into traditional therapy and traditional therapy + cervical mobilization groups. While muscle strengthening, stretching, balance and coordination exercises were given to the traditional group, cervical mobilization was applied in addition to these in cervical group. Patients received treatments twice a week for 4 weeks. The effect of the applied treatment on the tonus and plantar pressure distribution was analyzed. Treatments were interrupted for 4 weeks and the groups continued with the treatment they did not receive (crossover design). The group that received traditional treatment in the first period completed traditional + cervical mobilization, and the other group with traditional + cervical mobilization traditionally completed the treatment.