Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03009526 |
Other study ID # |
MAC-P.02/16/1872 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
Phase 3
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 17, 2017 |
Est. completion date |
October 24, 2018 |
Study information
Verified date |
July 2021 |
Source |
University of Malawi College of Medicine |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This study aims to compare the efficacy of monthly IPTp-DP with monthly IPTp-SP to determine
if IPTp-DP is associated with a reduction in malaria infection at delivery among HIV-negative
women in an area with high levels of SP resistance in Malawi.
Description:
Problem to be studied Malaria in pregnancy (MiP) due to Plasmodium falciparum infection is a
major cause of maternal morbidity and poor birth outcomes in malaria-endemic countries.
Pregnant women are at increased risk of more frequent and severe malaria infections than
non-pregnant women. Intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) with
sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), which involves administration of treatment doses of SP at
each antenatal visit in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, at least one month
apart, irrespective of malaria parasitemia, is currently recommended for all women, except
HIV positive women taking daily cotrimoxazole prophylaxis, in areas with stable moderate to
high transmission of malaria.
SP is the only drug currently used for IPTp. Due to increasing resistance to SP, it is no
longer used as a treatment for symptomatic malaria, however, IPTp-SP remains effective even
in areas where SP resistance in children under five (determined by in vivo efficacy studies)
is up to 26%, and continues to be used for IPTp in countries where SP is no longer
recommended to treat symptomatic malaria. However, IPTp-SP has become more controversial
given recent data from northern Tanzania and Malawi that have demonstrated that at higher
rates of resistance, IPTp-SP may no longer be effective.
Alternative drugs which could replace SP have been tested; mefloquine,
azithromycin-chloroquine, and amodiaquine have been abandoned as options due to poor
tolerability among pregnant women. Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine (DP) remains an attractive
option because of the long half-life of piperaquine (PQ) and the demonstrated efficacy,
safety, and tolerability in pregnancy. Recent studies in Kenya and Uganda using DP for IPTp
demonstrated a significant reduction in the prevalence of malaria throughout pregnancy and at
the time of delivery. However, there was not a clear benefit in terms of improved neonatal
outcomes. Additional studies are therefore needed to determine the impact of switching from
IPTp-SP to IPTp-DP.
Study aims Primary objectives To compare the efficacy of monthly IPTp-DP with monthly IPTp-SP
to determine if IPTp-DP is associated with a reduction in malaria infection at delivery among
HIV-negative women in an area with high levels of SP resistance in Malawi.
Secondary objectives
- To determine if IPTp-DP results in decreased fetal morbidity compared with IPTp-SP,
where fetal morbidity is defined as the composite of any of the following: Preterm birth
(< 37 weeks gestation), low birth weight (LBW) (< 2,500 grams), or small for gestational
age (SGA).
- To evaluate the tolerability and safety of IPTp-DP in the second and third trimesters of
pregnancy, including an assessment of cardiac risk, as measured by changes in QTc
intervals from baseline with each successive dose.
- To compare the frequency of adverse events and fetal congenital malformations in IPTp-DP
with IPTp-SP.
- To assess how SP and DP affect the maternal intestinal and vaginal microbiome.
Methodology Open-label, 2 arm randomized controlled superiority trial to compare the efficacy
and safety of IPTp-DP to IPTp-SP in Malawi. The trial is designed to show a 60% decrease in
malaria infection at delivery among HIV-negative women of all gravidity when IPTp-DP is used
instead of IPTp-SP.
Expected findings and dissemination It is expected that in areas of high SP resistance,
IPTp-DP will be superior to IPTp-SP in decreasing malaria infection at delivery. In addition,
it is anticipated that DP will be well-tolerated among pregnant women and that fetal outcomes
will be better than IPTp-SP.