Pregnancy Clinical Trial
Official title:
Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for the Third Trimester Induction of Labor
Approximately 22% of term pregnancies are induced. Misoprostol, a prostaglandin E1 analogue, is a widely accepted induction agent, that has been proven safe and effective for induction of labor. It stimulates both cervical ripening and uterine contractions, thus making it an ideal induction agent for unfavorable cervices. Research has examined the pharmacokinetics of different administration routes and effects on uterine contractility, side effects, and safety. Vaginal misoprostol has been shown to be superior over oral administration however patients often prefer a more tolerable route. Buccal administration has already been shown to be as effective as vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction in both first trimester and second trimester abortions. There is minimal research comparing buccal versus vaginal for third trimester induction of labor. The investigators study is a prospective, double blinded, randomized control trial comparing vaginal misoprostol and buccal misoprostol in equal dosages of 25 mcg. The investigators seek to answer the question whether buccal misoprostol is as effective as vaginal misoprostol for third trimester induction of labor.
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 81 |
Est. completion date | December 2014 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2014 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years to 50 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Willingness to participate / consent in a placebo-controlled trial - Age 18 and older - Pregnancy between 34 and 42 years of gestation - Admitted for labor induction because of either medical, obstetric, or psychosocial indications - Live singleton fetus - Bishop score less than or equal to six - Cephalic presentation - Reactive non-stress test or Negative contraction test Exclusion Criteria: - Premature rupture of membranes - Multiparity > 5 - Contraindication to vaginal or labor delivery - Suspected placental abruption - Significant hepatic, renal or cardiac disease - Known hypersensitivity to misoprostol or prostaglandin analogue - Recent prostaglandin administration for induction of labor - Multifetal pregnancy - Macrosomia > 4500g estimated fetal weight by ultrasound or leopold |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center | Los Angeles | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of California, Los Angeles |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Efficacy of buccal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol for third trimester induction of labor | The main outcome variable is vaginal delivery within 24 hours of induction. | Until delivery (up to 72 hrs) | No |
Secondary | Patient satisfaction with buccal versus vaginal misoprostol administration. | Gastrointestinal side effects Patient preferred route of administration Patients will be followed for the duration of their labor(usually up to 72hrs). The satisfaction survey will be conducted after delivery but will evaluate side effects that they recollect in labor | Until delivery (up to 72hrs) | No |
Secondary | Efficacy of buccal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol for third trimester induction of labor | Induction to delivery time, Induction to active labor time, Duration of labor, Number of misoprostol doses needed, Need for augmentation with pitocin, Cesarean section secondary to fetal distress, Cesarean section secondary to failed induction of labor, Chorioamnionitis, non reassuring fetal status. Patients will be followed for the duration of their labor(usually up to 72hrs) | Until delivery (up to 72 hrs) | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03442582 -
Afluria Pregnancy Registry
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02161861 -
Improvement of IVF Fertilization Rates, by the Cyclic Tripeptide FEE - Prospective Randomized Study
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05934318 -
L-ArGinine to pRevent advErse prEgnancy Outcomes (AGREE)
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05415371 -
Persistent Poverty Counties Pregnant Women With Medicaid
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04548102 -
Effects of Fetal Movement Counting on Maternal and Fetal Outcome Among High Risk Pregnant Woman
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03218956 -
Protein Requirement During Lactation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02191605 -
Computer-delivered Screening & Brief Intervention for Marijuana Use in Pregnancy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02223637 -
Meningococcal Quadrivalent CRM-197 Conjugate Vaccine Pregnancy Registry
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06049953 -
Maternal And Infant Antipsychotic Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT02577536 -
PregSource: Crowdsourcing to Understand Pregnancy
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06336434 -
CREATE - Cabotegravir & Rilpivirine Antiretroviral Therapy in Pregnancy
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04786587 -
Alcohol Self-reporting During Pregnancy. AUTOQUEST Study.
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05412238 -
Formulation and Evaluation of the Efficacy of Macro- and Micronutrient Sachets on Pregnant Mothers and Children Aged 6-60 Months
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05028387 -
Telemedicine Medical Abortion Service Using the "No-test" Protocol in Ukraine and Uzbekistan.
|
||
Completed |
NCT02683005 -
Study of Hepatitis C Treatment During Pregnancy
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02783170 -
Safety and Immunogenicity of Simultaneous Tdap and IIV in Pregnant Women
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02619188 -
Nutritional Markers in Normal and Hyperemesis Pregnancies
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02564250 -
Maternal Metabolism and Pregnancy Outcomes in Obese Pregnant Women
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02507180 -
Safely Ruling Out Deep Vein Thrombosis in Pregnancy With the LEFt Clinical Decision Rule and D-Dimer
|
||
Completed |
NCT02566005 -
A Randomized Comparison of Transcervical Foley Bulb With Vaginal Misoprostol to Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor
|
N/A |