Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05834023
Other study ID # CEC-HCHM 05-2023
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received
Last updated
Start date May 2, 2023
Est. completion date January 5, 2024

Study information

Verified date January 2024
Source Hospital de San Carlos Dr. Benicio Arzola Medina
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

In this study, the investigators will compare two different anesthetic solutions in the infraclavicular block in patients having forearm, wrist, and hand surgery. The solutions will be bupivacaine 0.5% versus bupivacaine 0.25% plus lidocaine 1%, both associated with epinephrine 5 mcg/ml and dexamethasone 4 mg. The main objective of this investigation is to demonstrate that using higher concentrations of bupivacaine alone results in a significant block duration increase compared with the mixture of bupivacaine and lidocaine.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 40
Est. completion date January 5, 2024
Est. primary completion date December 29, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Age between 18 and 80 years - American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 1-3 - Surgery of the forearm, wrist, and hand - Weight = 80 kilograms Exclusion Criteria: - Adults who are unable to give their consent - Infection in the injection site (infraclavicular region) - Pre-existing neuropathy (assessed by history and physical examination) - Coagulopathy (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work, i.e., platelets = 100, International Normalized Ratio = 1.4) - Renal failure (assessed by history and physical examination and if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work, i.e., creatinine = 1.2) - Hepatic failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work, i.e., transaminases = 100) - Allergy to local anesthetics (LAs) - Pregnancy or breastfeeding - Prior surgery in the infraclavicular region - Chronic pain syndromes requiring opioid intake at home

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Bupivacaine-Lidocaine
Infraclavicular block with 35 ml of the following anesthetic solution: Bupivacaine 0.25% + Lidocaine 1% + dexamethasone 4 mg + epinephrine 5 mcg/ml
Bupivacaine
Infraclavicular block with 35 ml of the following anesthetic solution: Bupivacaine 0.5% + dexamethasone 4 mg + epinephrine 5 mcg/ml

Locations

Country Name City State
Chile Hospital de San Carlos Dr. Benicio Arzola Medina San Carlos Ñuble

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Hospital de San Carlos Dr. Benicio Arzola Medina

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Chile, 

References & Publications (15)

Aguirre J, Del Moral A, Cobo I, Borgeat A, Blumenthal S. The role of continuous peripheral nerve blocks. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:560879. doi: 10.1155/2012/560879. Epub 2012 Jun 18. — View Citation

Almasi R, Rezman B, Kriszta Z, Patczai B, Wiegand N, Bogar L. Onset times and duration of analgesic effect of various concentrations of local anesthetic solutions in standardized volume used for brachial plexus blocks. Heliyon. 2020 Sep 2;6(9):e04718. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04718. eCollection 2020 Sep. — View Citation

Bobik P, Kosel J, Swirydo P, Talalaj M, Czaban I, Radziwon W. Comparison of the pharmacological properties of 0.375% bupivacaine with epinephrine, 0.5% ropivacaine and a mixture of bupivacaine with epinephrine and lignocaine - a randomized prospective study. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2020 Jun;54(3):156-160. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2020.1720999. Epub 2020 Jan 31. — View Citation

Chelly JE, Ghisi D, Fanelli A. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks in acute pain management. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Dec;105 Suppl 1:i86-96. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq322. — View Citation

Choi S, Rodseth R, McCartney CJ. Effects of dexamethasone as a local anaesthetic adjuvant for brachial plexus block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Mar;112(3):427-39. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet417. Epub 2014 Jan 10. — View Citation

Chong MA, Berbenetz NM, Lin C, Singh S. Perineural Versus Intravenous Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant for Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):319-326. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000571. — View Citation

Desai N, Albrecht E, El-Boghdadly K. Perineural adjuncts for peripheral nerve block. BJA Educ. 2019 Sep;19(9):276-282. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 Jul 6. No abstract available. — View Citation

Gadsden J, Hadzic A, Gandhi K, Shariat A, Xu D, Maliakal T, Patel V. The effect of mixing 1.5% mepivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine on duration of analgesia and latency of block onset in ultrasound-guided interscalene block. Anesth Analg. 2011 Feb;112(2):471-6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182042f7f. Epub 2010 Dec 14. — View Citation

Ilfeld BM. Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks: An Update of the Published Evidence and Comparison With Novel, Alternative Analgesic Modalities. Anesth Analg. 2017 Jan;124(1):308-335. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001581. — View Citation

Laur JJ, Bayman EO, Foldes PJ, Rosenquist RW. Triple-blind randomized clinical trial of time until sensory change using 1.5% mepivacaine with epinephrine, 0.5% bupivacaine, or an equal mixture of both for infraclavicular block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;37(1):28-33. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318236bc30. — View Citation

Nestor CC, Ng C, Sepulveda P, Irwin MG. Pharmacological and clinical implications of local anaesthetic mixtures: a narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2022 Mar;77(3):339-350. doi: 10.1111/anae.15641. Epub 2021 Dec 14. — View Citation

Pongraweewan O, Inchua N, Kitsiripant C, Kongmuang B, Tiwirach W. Onset Time of 2% Lidocaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine Mixture versus 0.5% Bupivacaine Alone using Ultrasound and Double Nerve Stimulation for Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Anesthesia in ESRD Patients Undergoing Arteriovenous Fistula Creation. J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 May;99(5):589-95. — View Citation

Ribotsky BM, Berkowitz KD, Montague JR. Local anesthetics. Is there an advantage to mixing solutions? J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1996 Oct;86(10):487-91. doi: 10.7547/87507315-86-10-487. — View Citation

Sinatra RS, Goldstein R, Sevarino FB. The clinical effectiveness of epidural bupivacaine, bupivacaine with lidocaine, and bupivacaine with fentanyl for labor analgesia. J Clin Anesth. 1991 May-Jun;3(3):219-24; discussion 214-5. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(91)90164-i. — View Citation

Vrancken D, Theunissen M, Joosten EA, Fiddelers AAA, Hoofwijk DMN, Buhre WFFA, Gramke HF, Stessel BOR. Procedure-Specific Pain Intensity Four Days After Day Surgery and the Relationship with Preoperative Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study. Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov 17;8(6):e81366. doi: 10.5812/aapm.81366. eCollection 2018 Dec. — View Citation

* Note: There are 15 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Motor block duration The time interval in minutes between the end of the local anesthetic injection and the return of hand mobility. 0 - 48 hours after block
Secondary Sensory block duration The time interval in minutes between the end of the local anesthetic injection and the return of hand sensation. 0 - 48 hours after block
Secondary Analgesic block duration The time interval in minutes between the end of the local anesthetic injection and the first sensation of pain in the surgical area. 0 - 48 hours after block
Secondary Sensory and motor block score The sensorimotor block will be assessed every 5 minutes until 60 minutes after the end of local anesthetic injection using a 16-point composite score evaluating sensory and motor block of musculocutaneous, median, radial, and ulnar nerves.
Sensation will be assessed with a pinprick test in each nerve territory with a 0 to 2-point scale. 0= no block, patients can feel a pin prick; 1= analgesic block, the patient can feel touch but not pinprick; 2= anesthetic block, the patient cannot feel pinprick or touch.
The motor function will be assessed for each nerve with a 0 to 2 points scale where 0= no motor block; 1= paresis; 2= paralysis.
0 - 60 minutes after block
Secondary Block onset time The time interval in minutes between the end of the local anesthetic injection and a minimal sensorimotor composite score of 14 out of 16 points.
The sensorimotor score is described in Outcome 4.
0 - 60 minutes after block
Secondary Incidence of successful block Patients with a minimal sensorimotor score of 14 out of 16 points, with at least 7 points in the sensitive score. The sensorimotor score is described in Outcome 4. 0 - 60 minutes after block
Secondary Incidence of failed block Patients with a sensorimotor score of 13 points or less. The sensorimotor score is described in Outcome 4. 0 - 60 minutes after block
Secondary Incidence of anesthetic block Ability to proceed with the surgery without general anesthesia, rescue blocks, or local anesthesia infiltration by the surgeon. 60 to 120 minutes after the ending time of local anesthetic injection
Secondary Procedural pain Pain related to the nerve block according to the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain. This scale is graduated from 0 to 10 points. A 0-point score represents the absence of pain, and a 10-point score means the worst imaginable pain. Immediately after nerve block
Secondary Image time The time interval in seconds between the probe placement and the acquisition of the final ultrasonographic image. 2 hours before surgery
Secondary Needle time The time interval in seconds between the skin infiltration and the end of local anesthetic injection 2 hours before surgery
Secondary Block performance time Sum of image and needle time 2 hours before surgery
Secondary Number of patients requiring general anesthesia Patients who need general anesthesia to proceed with the surgery 60 to 120 minutes after the ending time of local anesthetic injection
Secondary Diaphragmatic function Diaphragmatic excursion in millimeters evaluated by ultrasound in three different times: pre-block, 60 minutes after block, and at the end of the surgery From arrival to the pre-anesthesia unit to the end of surgery
Secondary Rate of diaphragmatic paresis Patients with decreased diaphragmatic excursion by 25% to 75% compared with the basal function 60 minutes after the block or at the end of the surgery. From 60 minutes after block to the end of the surgery
Secondary Rate of diaphragmatic paralysis Patients with decreased diaphragmatic excursion greater than 75% compared with the basal function, absence of diaphragmatic movement, or paradoxical movement 60 minutes after the block or at the end of the surgery. From 60 minutes after block to the end of the surgery
Secondary Incidence of rebound pain Severe pain (NRS = 7) in the surgical area within 24 hours after the block wears off. 24 hours after the block wears off
Secondary Incidence of nerve block side effects The presence of Horner syndrome, paresthesia, vascular puncture, hematoma, or local anesthetic systemic toxicity after the nerve block. From skin anesthesia to 60 minutes after the nerve block
Secondary Postoperative complications Presence of persistent paresthesia, numbness, or motor deficit in the postoperative period. 7 days after surgery
Secondary Duration of surgery Time in minutes between skin incision and closure. 3 hours after skin incision
Secondary Pain score in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) Highest pain reported by the patient in the PACU according to the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain. This scale is graduated from 0 to 10 points. A 0-point score represents the absence of pain, and a 10-point score means the worst imaginable pain. 3 hours after the end of the surgery
Secondary Length of PACU stay The time interval in minutes between PACU arrival to readiness to discharge 3 hours after the end of the surgery
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04633850 - Implementation of Adjuvants in Intercostal Nerve Blockades for Thoracoscopic Surgery in Pulmonary Cancer Patients
Recruiting NCT03181620 - Sedation Administration Timing: Intermittent Dosing Reduces Time to Extubation N/A
Completed NCT04579354 - Virtual Reality (VR) Tour to Reduce Preoperative Anxiety Before Anaesthesia N/A
Recruiting NCT06007378 - Optimizing Postoperative Pain Control After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT05943015 - Analgesic Efficacy of Quadratus Lumborum, Paravertebral Blocks N/A
Completed NCT04544228 - Ketamine or Neostigmine for Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Modified Radical Mastectomy N/A
Completed NCT03678168 - A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries N/A
Completed NCT03286543 - Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System N/A
Completed NCT03663478 - Continuous TQL Block for Elective Cesarean Section Phase 4
Completed NCT04176822 - Designing Animated Movie for Preoperative Period N/A
Completed NCT05170477 - Influence of Apical Patency Concept Upon Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Treatment N/A
Completed NCT06425601 - A Comparison of Silicone Versus Polyvinylchloride (PVC) Drains Following VATS Lobectomy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04561856 - Fascia Iliaca Block Supplemented With Perineural Vs Intravenous Dexamethasone Phase 4
Completed NCT03612947 - TAP Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Phase 2
Completed NCT05974501 - Pre vs Post Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Phase 4
Completed NCT05995912 - Efficacy and Safety of Etoricoxib-tramadol Tablet in Acute Postoperative Pain Phase 2
Completed NCT04571515 - Dose-Response Study of MR-107A-01 in The Treatment of Post-Surgical Dental Pain Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04190355 - The Effect of Irrigant Types Used During Endodontic Treatment on Postoperative Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT05145153 - Incidence of Chronic Pain After Thoracic Surgery
Recruiting NCT03697278 - Monitoring Postoperative Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) N/A