Postoperative Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison Between Bupivacaine 0.5% Versus Bupivacaine 0.25% Plus Lidocaine 1% in Ultrasound-guided Infraclavicular Block: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Verified date | January 2024 |
Source | Hospital de San Carlos Dr. Benicio Arzola Medina |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
In this study, the investigators will compare two different anesthetic solutions in the infraclavicular block in patients having forearm, wrist, and hand surgery. The solutions will be bupivacaine 0.5% versus bupivacaine 0.25% plus lidocaine 1%, both associated with epinephrine 5 mcg/ml and dexamethasone 4 mg. The main objective of this investigation is to demonstrate that using higher concentrations of bupivacaine alone results in a significant block duration increase compared with the mixture of bupivacaine and lidocaine.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 40 |
Est. completion date | January 5, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | December 29, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Age between 18 and 80 years - American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 1-3 - Surgery of the forearm, wrist, and hand - Weight = 80 kilograms Exclusion Criteria: - Adults who are unable to give their consent - Infection in the injection site (infraclavicular region) - Pre-existing neuropathy (assessed by history and physical examination) - Coagulopathy (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work, i.e., platelets = 100, International Normalized Ratio = 1.4) - Renal failure (assessed by history and physical examination and if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work, i.e., creatinine = 1.2) - Hepatic failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work, i.e., transaminases = 100) - Allergy to local anesthetics (LAs) - Pregnancy or breastfeeding - Prior surgery in the infraclavicular region - Chronic pain syndromes requiring opioid intake at home |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Chile | Hospital de San Carlos Dr. Benicio Arzola Medina | San Carlos | Ñuble |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Hospital de San Carlos Dr. Benicio Arzola Medina |
Chile,
Aguirre J, Del Moral A, Cobo I, Borgeat A, Blumenthal S. The role of continuous peripheral nerve blocks. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:560879. doi: 10.1155/2012/560879. Epub 2012 Jun 18. — View Citation
Almasi R, Rezman B, Kriszta Z, Patczai B, Wiegand N, Bogar L. Onset times and duration of analgesic effect of various concentrations of local anesthetic solutions in standardized volume used for brachial plexus blocks. Heliyon. 2020 Sep 2;6(9):e04718. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04718. eCollection 2020 Sep. — View Citation
Bobik P, Kosel J, Swirydo P, Talalaj M, Czaban I, Radziwon W. Comparison of the pharmacological properties of 0.375% bupivacaine with epinephrine, 0.5% ropivacaine and a mixture of bupivacaine with epinephrine and lignocaine - a randomized prospective study. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2020 Jun;54(3):156-160. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2020.1720999. Epub 2020 Jan 31. — View Citation
Chelly JE, Ghisi D, Fanelli A. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks in acute pain management. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Dec;105 Suppl 1:i86-96. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq322. — View Citation
Choi S, Rodseth R, McCartney CJ. Effects of dexamethasone as a local anaesthetic adjuvant for brachial plexus block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Mar;112(3):427-39. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet417. Epub 2014 Jan 10. — View Citation
Chong MA, Berbenetz NM, Lin C, Singh S. Perineural Versus Intravenous Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant for Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):319-326. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000571. — View Citation
Desai N, Albrecht E, El-Boghdadly K. Perineural adjuncts for peripheral nerve block. BJA Educ. 2019 Sep;19(9):276-282. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 Jul 6. No abstract available. — View Citation
Gadsden J, Hadzic A, Gandhi K, Shariat A, Xu D, Maliakal T, Patel V. The effect of mixing 1.5% mepivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine on duration of analgesia and latency of block onset in ultrasound-guided interscalene block. Anesth Analg. 2011 Feb;112(2):471-6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182042f7f. Epub 2010 Dec 14. — View Citation
Ilfeld BM. Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks: An Update of the Published Evidence and Comparison With Novel, Alternative Analgesic Modalities. Anesth Analg. 2017 Jan;124(1):308-335. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001581. — View Citation
Laur JJ, Bayman EO, Foldes PJ, Rosenquist RW. Triple-blind randomized clinical trial of time until sensory change using 1.5% mepivacaine with epinephrine, 0.5% bupivacaine, or an equal mixture of both for infraclavicular block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;37(1):28-33. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318236bc30. — View Citation
Nestor CC, Ng C, Sepulveda P, Irwin MG. Pharmacological and clinical implications of local anaesthetic mixtures: a narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2022 Mar;77(3):339-350. doi: 10.1111/anae.15641. Epub 2021 Dec 14. — View Citation
Pongraweewan O, Inchua N, Kitsiripant C, Kongmuang B, Tiwirach W. Onset Time of 2% Lidocaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine Mixture versus 0.5% Bupivacaine Alone using Ultrasound and Double Nerve Stimulation for Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Anesthesia in ESRD Patients Undergoing Arteriovenous Fistula Creation. J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 May;99(5):589-95. — View Citation
Ribotsky BM, Berkowitz KD, Montague JR. Local anesthetics. Is there an advantage to mixing solutions? J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1996 Oct;86(10):487-91. doi: 10.7547/87507315-86-10-487. — View Citation
Sinatra RS, Goldstein R, Sevarino FB. The clinical effectiveness of epidural bupivacaine, bupivacaine with lidocaine, and bupivacaine with fentanyl for labor analgesia. J Clin Anesth. 1991 May-Jun;3(3):219-24; discussion 214-5. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(91)90164-i. — View Citation
Vrancken D, Theunissen M, Joosten EA, Fiddelers AAA, Hoofwijk DMN, Buhre WFFA, Gramke HF, Stessel BOR. Procedure-Specific Pain Intensity Four Days After Day Surgery and the Relationship with Preoperative Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study. Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov 17;8(6):e81366. doi: 10.5812/aapm.81366. eCollection 2018 Dec. — View Citation
* Note: There are 15 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Motor block duration | The time interval in minutes between the end of the local anesthetic injection and the return of hand mobility. | 0 - 48 hours after block | |
Secondary | Sensory block duration | The time interval in minutes between the end of the local anesthetic injection and the return of hand sensation. | 0 - 48 hours after block | |
Secondary | Analgesic block duration | The time interval in minutes between the end of the local anesthetic injection and the first sensation of pain in the surgical area. | 0 - 48 hours after block | |
Secondary | Sensory and motor block score | The sensorimotor block will be assessed every 5 minutes until 60 minutes after the end of local anesthetic injection using a 16-point composite score evaluating sensory and motor block of musculocutaneous, median, radial, and ulnar nerves.
Sensation will be assessed with a pinprick test in each nerve territory with a 0 to 2-point scale. 0= no block, patients can feel a pin prick; 1= analgesic block, the patient can feel touch but not pinprick; 2= anesthetic block, the patient cannot feel pinprick or touch. The motor function will be assessed for each nerve with a 0 to 2 points scale where 0= no motor block; 1= paresis; 2= paralysis. |
0 - 60 minutes after block | |
Secondary | Block onset time | The time interval in minutes between the end of the local anesthetic injection and a minimal sensorimotor composite score of 14 out of 16 points.
The sensorimotor score is described in Outcome 4. |
0 - 60 minutes after block | |
Secondary | Incidence of successful block | Patients with a minimal sensorimotor score of 14 out of 16 points, with at least 7 points in the sensitive score. The sensorimotor score is described in Outcome 4. | 0 - 60 minutes after block | |
Secondary | Incidence of failed block | Patients with a sensorimotor score of 13 points or less. The sensorimotor score is described in Outcome 4. | 0 - 60 minutes after block | |
Secondary | Incidence of anesthetic block | Ability to proceed with the surgery without general anesthesia, rescue blocks, or local anesthesia infiltration by the surgeon. | 60 to 120 minutes after the ending time of local anesthetic injection | |
Secondary | Procedural pain | Pain related to the nerve block according to the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain. This scale is graduated from 0 to 10 points. A 0-point score represents the absence of pain, and a 10-point score means the worst imaginable pain. | Immediately after nerve block | |
Secondary | Image time | The time interval in seconds between the probe placement and the acquisition of the final ultrasonographic image. | 2 hours before surgery | |
Secondary | Needle time | The time interval in seconds between the skin infiltration and the end of local anesthetic injection | 2 hours before surgery | |
Secondary | Block performance time | Sum of image and needle time | 2 hours before surgery | |
Secondary | Number of patients requiring general anesthesia | Patients who need general anesthesia to proceed with the surgery | 60 to 120 minutes after the ending time of local anesthetic injection | |
Secondary | Diaphragmatic function | Diaphragmatic excursion in millimeters evaluated by ultrasound in three different times: pre-block, 60 minutes after block, and at the end of the surgery | From arrival to the pre-anesthesia unit to the end of surgery | |
Secondary | Rate of diaphragmatic paresis | Patients with decreased diaphragmatic excursion by 25% to 75% compared with the basal function 60 minutes after the block or at the end of the surgery. | From 60 minutes after block to the end of the surgery | |
Secondary | Rate of diaphragmatic paralysis | Patients with decreased diaphragmatic excursion greater than 75% compared with the basal function, absence of diaphragmatic movement, or paradoxical movement 60 minutes after the block or at the end of the surgery. | From 60 minutes after block to the end of the surgery | |
Secondary | Incidence of rebound pain | Severe pain (NRS = 7) in the surgical area within 24 hours after the block wears off. | 24 hours after the block wears off | |
Secondary | Incidence of nerve block side effects | The presence of Horner syndrome, paresthesia, vascular puncture, hematoma, or local anesthetic systemic toxicity after the nerve block. | From skin anesthesia to 60 minutes after the nerve block | |
Secondary | Postoperative complications | Presence of persistent paresthesia, numbness, or motor deficit in the postoperative period. | 7 days after surgery | |
Secondary | Duration of surgery | Time in minutes between skin incision and closure. | 3 hours after skin incision | |
Secondary | Pain score in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) | Highest pain reported by the patient in the PACU according to the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain. This scale is graduated from 0 to 10 points. A 0-point score represents the absence of pain, and a 10-point score means the worst imaginable pain. | 3 hours after the end of the surgery | |
Secondary | Length of PACU stay | The time interval in minutes between PACU arrival to readiness to discharge | 3 hours after the end of the surgery |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04633850 -
Implementation of Adjuvants in Intercostal Nerve Blockades for Thoracoscopic Surgery in Pulmonary Cancer Patients
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03181620 -
Sedation Administration Timing: Intermittent Dosing Reduces Time to Extubation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04579354 -
Virtual Reality (VR) Tour to Reduce Preoperative Anxiety Before Anaesthesia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06007378 -
Optimizing Postoperative Pain Control After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05943015 -
Analgesic Efficacy of Quadratus Lumborum, Paravertebral Blocks
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04544228 -
Ketamine or Neostigmine for Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Modified Radical Mastectomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03678168 -
A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03286543 -
Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03663478 -
Continuous TQL Block for Elective Cesarean Section
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04176822 -
Designing Animated Movie for Preoperative Period
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05170477 -
Influence of Apical Patency Concept Upon Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06425601 -
A Comparison of Silicone Versus Polyvinylchloride (PVC) Drains Following VATS Lobectomy
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04561856 -
Fascia Iliaca Block Supplemented With Perineural Vs Intravenous Dexamethasone
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03612947 -
TAP Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05974501 -
Pre vs Post Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05995912 -
Efficacy and Safety of Etoricoxib-tramadol Tablet in Acute Postoperative Pain
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04571515 -
Dose-Response Study of MR-107A-01 in The Treatment of Post-Surgical Dental Pain
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04190355 -
The Effect of Irrigant Types Used During Endodontic Treatment on Postoperative Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05145153 -
Incidence of Chronic Pain After Thoracic Surgery
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03697278 -
Monitoring Postoperative Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA)
|
N/A |