Erector Spinae vs TAP in Lower Abdominal Surgery

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the analgesic effect and safety profile of erector spinae plane block with transverses abdominis plane block in controlling peri-operative pain for lower abdominal cancer surgery.

Clinical Trial Description

Pain triggers a complex biochemical and physiological stress response leading to impairment of pulmonary, immunological and metabolic functions. Opioids are the current gold standard drug for postoperative pain relief, however exposure to large doses lead to multiple side effects of varying significance such as nausea, vomiting, dizziness, constipation, respiratory depression, hypoventilation and sleep breathing disorders. Therefore strategies other than opioids are recommended without sacrificing proper and effective analgesia. Especially in cancer patients who are more susceptible to tolerance and addiction.

The Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block, is a regional anaesthesia technique used effectively in laparotomies. Unilateral analgesia to the skin, muscles, and parietal peritoneum of the anterior abdominal wall will be achieved without affecting visceral pain, when the anterior rami of the lower six thoracic nerves (T7-T12) and the first lumbar nerve (L1) are blocked.

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) was shown to be an effective analgesic option for different types of surgeries. It's relatively a simple block, drug is injected in the plane between the erector spinae muscle and the vertebral transverse process. Blocking the ventral and dorsal rami of spinal nerves on the paravertebral area distributed from T2-T4 to L1-L2 and gives good coverage to visceral pain. Owing to the lower risk of blood vessel damage and neural damage compared to the epidural or the paravertebral block.

Both blocks haven't been compared to each other in this type of surgery before. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT04555993
Study type	Interventional
Source	National Cancer Institute, Egypt
Contact	ahmed hasanin, Professor
Phone	+201095076954
Email	ahmedmohamedhasanin@gmail.com
Status	Recruiting
Phase	N/A
Start date	February 28, 2020
Completion date	October 15, 2020

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT04633850` - Implementation of Adjuvants in Intercostal Nerve Blockades for Thoracoscopic Surgery in Pulmonary Cancer Patients
Recruiting	`NCT03181620` - Sedation Administration Timing: Intermittent Dosing Reduces Time to Extubation	N/A
Completed	`NCT04579354` - Virtual Reality (VR) Tour to Reduce Preoperative Anxiety Before Anaesthesia	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06007378` - Optimizing Postoperative Pain Control After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05943015` - Analgesic Efficacy of Quadratus Lumborum, Paravertebral Blocks	N/A
Completed	`NCT04544228` - Ketamine or Neostigmine for Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Modified Radical Mastectomy	N/A
Completed	`NCT03678168` - A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries	N/A
Completed	`NCT03286543` - Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System	N/A
Completed	`NCT03663478` - Continuous TQL Block for Elective Cesarean Section	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT04176822` - Designing Animated Movie for Preoperative Period	N/A
Completed	`NCT05170477` - Influence of Apical Patency Concept Upon Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Treatment	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04561856` - Fascia Iliaca Block Supplemented With Perineural Vs Intravenous Dexamethasone	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT06425601` - A Comparison of Silicone Versus Polyvinylchloride (PVC) Drains Following VATS Lobectomy	N/A
Completed	`NCT03612947` - TAP Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT05974501` - Pre vs Post Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT05995912` - Efficacy and Safety of Etoricoxib-tramadol Tablet in Acute Postoperative Pain	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT04571515` - Dose-Response Study of MR-107A-01 in The Treatment of Post-Surgical Dental Pain	Phase 2
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04190355` - The Effect of Irrigant Types Used During Endodontic Treatment on Postoperative Pain	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05145153` - Incidence of Chronic Pain After Thoracic Surgery
Recruiting	`NCT03697278` - Monitoring Postoperative Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA)	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.