Does ESPB Improve Postoperative Quality of Recovery After VATS

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) is a minimally invasive surgery. Despite reduced surgical trauma compared to the traditional thoracotomy approach, pain control after VATS remains challenging. Regional analgesia may be a crucial component of multimodal postoperative pain management. The use of nerve blocks, such as the recently described erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been shown in case reports to reduce pain and thus has the potential to improve patient recovery. This study aims to test the hypothesis that ultrasound-guided SPB would improve the quality of recovery after VATS by reducing acute postsurgical pain.

Clinical Trial Description

VATS is a minimally invasive surgical technique to remove intrathoracic lesions. VATS has become increasingly popular and gradually becoming the standard of care for lung surgery. Although acute pain after VATS is less than the traditional thoracotomy, patients still experience moderate amount of pain within the first 24 hours. However, the optimal regional analgesic technique for VATS procedures has not been established.

Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and paravertebral block (PVB) have been tried to improve postoperative analgesia after VATS. Although TEA and PVB provides superior analgesia, these technologies accompanied by the rare but serious complications involving epidural hematoma, pneumothorax and total spinal anesthesia.

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel and simple ultrasound-guided regional anesthetic technique, providing analgesia for the ipsilateral hemithorax. Ultrasound guidance is believed to improve peripheral and regional nerve block success rates and safety. ESPB is a technically easy to perform. ESPB has only been reported in case series but so far, no adverse events such as hypotension, hematoma or infection has been reported.

Given its safety, ease of performance and efficacy, the study aims to verify the hypothesis that combines ESPB with general anesthesia would accelerate functional recovery after breast cancer surgery. Our secondary aims were to examine ESPB's effect on analgesic outcomes (e.g., postoperative pain intensity, cumulative opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, dizziness, the postanesthesia care unit discharge time and patients' satisfaction) in patients undergoing VATS. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT03756987
Study type	Interventional
Source	Fujian Provincial Hospital
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	December 28, 2018
Completion date	November 14, 2019

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT04633850` - Implementation of Adjuvants in Intercostal Nerve Blockades for Thoracoscopic Surgery in Pulmonary Cancer Patients
Recruiting	`NCT03181620` - Sedation Administration Timing: Intermittent Dosing Reduces Time to Extubation	N/A
Completed	`NCT04579354` - Virtual Reality (VR) Tour to Reduce Preoperative Anxiety Before Anaesthesia	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06007378` - Optimizing Postoperative Pain Control After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05943015` - Analgesic Efficacy of Quadratus Lumborum, Paravertebral Blocks	N/A
Completed	`NCT04544228` - Ketamine or Neostigmine for Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Modified Radical Mastectomy	N/A
Completed	`NCT03678168` - A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries	N/A
Completed	`NCT03286543` - Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System	N/A
Completed	`NCT03663478` - Continuous TQL Block for Elective Cesarean Section	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT04176822` - Designing Animated Movie for Preoperative Period	N/A
Completed	`NCT05170477` - Influence of Apical Patency Concept Upon Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Treatment	N/A
Completed	`NCT06425601` - A Comparison of Silicone Versus Polyvinylchloride (PVC) Drains Following VATS Lobectomy	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04561856` - Fascia Iliaca Block Supplemented With Perineural Vs Intravenous Dexamethasone	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT03612947` - TAP Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT05974501` - Pre vs Post Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT05995912` - Efficacy and Safety of Etoricoxib-tramadol Tablet in Acute Postoperative Pain	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT04571515` - Dose-Response Study of MR-107A-01 in The Treatment of Post-Surgical Dental Pain	Phase 2
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04190355` - The Effect of Irrigant Types Used During Endodontic Treatment on Postoperative Pain	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05145153` - Incidence of Chronic Pain After Thoracic Surgery
Recruiting	`NCT03697278` - Monitoring Postoperative Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA)	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.