Efficacy of Oral vs. Intravenous Acetaminophen

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The comparative efficacy of intravenous (IV) to oral (PO-'per os') acetaminophen in the management of postoperative pain is understudied and largely unknown. In this observer blinded randomized clinical trial, investigators aim to determine the comparative efficacy of PO (preoperative) vs. IV (intraoperative) acetaminophen in a sinus surgery population.

Clinical Trial Description

The comparative efficacy of intravenous (IV) to oral (PO-'per os') acetaminophen is understudied and largely unknown. Intravenous acetaminophen has been available since 2010 (http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/022450lbl.pdf) and has proven superiority over placebo in human clinical trials. It is clearly advantageous in patients who cannot take oral medications. Similarly, oral acetaminophen has proven efficacy in the management of postoperative pain.

However, in patients who can receive either formulation the incremental cost of the IV formulation, both to the Health System and patient, is substantial. This incremental cost would be justifiable if there were clear efficacy or safety data to support the preferential use of IV over PO acetaminophen.

However, there is no evidence of superior safety and there are only two studies to our knowledge investigating the question of comparative efficacy. Fenlon et al. randomized 130 patients undergoing 3rd molar (i.e., wisdom tooth) removal to IV vs. PO acetaminophen and found that PO acetaminophen was non-inferior to IV acetaminophen. The primary endpoint was postoperative pain score 1h after surgery. No safety concerns were identified in either group. Pettersson et al. randomized cardiac surgery patients to IV or PO acetaminophen, starting immediately postoperatively through the following morning, and found a significant opioid sparing effect of IV acetaminophen but no difference in pain scores or nausea.

IV acetaminophen avoids first-pass hepatic metabolism and therefore generates higher serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)/brain levels than does PO acetaminophen (http://ofirmev.com/Pharmacokinetics/). Based on the pharmacokinetic data, one can hypothesize that IV acetaminophen would be superior to PO acetaminophen at time points where serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid drug levels are higher. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT02643394
Study type	Interventional
Source	University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	Phase 4
Start date	August 17, 2015
Completion date	January 15, 2018

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT04633850` - Implementation of Adjuvants in Intercostal Nerve Blockades for Thoracoscopic Surgery in Pulmonary Cancer Patients
Recruiting	`NCT03181620` - Sedation Administration Timing: Intermittent Dosing Reduces Time to Extubation	N/A
Completed	`NCT04579354` - Virtual Reality (VR) Tour to Reduce Preoperative Anxiety Before Anaesthesia	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06007378` - Optimizing Postoperative Pain Control After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05943015` - Analgesic Efficacy of Quadratus Lumborum, Paravertebral Blocks	N/A
Completed	`NCT04544228` - Ketamine or Neostigmine for Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Modified Radical Mastectomy	N/A
Completed	`NCT03678168` - A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries	N/A
Completed	`NCT03286543` - Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System	N/A
Completed	`NCT03663478` - Continuous TQL Block for Elective Cesarean Section	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT04176822` - Designing Animated Movie for Preoperative Period	N/A
Completed	`NCT05170477` - Influence of Apical Patency Concept Upon Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Treatment	N/A
Completed	`NCT06425601` - A Comparison of Silicone Versus Polyvinylchloride (PVC) Drains Following VATS Lobectomy	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04561856` - Fascia Iliaca Block Supplemented With Perineural Vs Intravenous Dexamethasone	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT03612947` - TAP Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT05974501` - Pre vs Post Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT05995912` - Efficacy and Safety of Etoricoxib-tramadol Tablet in Acute Postoperative Pain	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT04571515` - Dose-Response Study of MR-107A-01 in The Treatment of Post-Surgical Dental Pain	Phase 2
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04190355` - The Effect of Irrigant Types Used During Endodontic Treatment on Postoperative Pain	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05145153` - Incidence of Chronic Pain After Thoracic Surgery
Recruiting	`NCT03697278` - Monitoring Postoperative Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA)	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.