Clinical Trials Logo

Postdural Puncture Headache clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Postdural Puncture Headache.

Filter by:
  • Completed  
  • Page 1 ·  Next »

NCT ID: NCT06394024 Completed - Clinical trials for Postdural Puncture Headache

Examination of Postdural Puncture Headache Frequency, Predisposing Factors and Treatment

PDPH
Start date: November 1, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the most important complications of neuraxial blocks and lumbar interventions for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination. It occurs due to tear in the dura mater and loss of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after intrathecal or epidural interventions.The incidence of PDPH depends on the thickness of the needle used and the type of tip. Headaches are more common with thick needles than with thin needles.In our study, postdural puncture headache in patients whose surgery was planned and spinal anesthesia was applied at Süleyman Demirel University faculty of medicine;frequency, predisposing factors, treatment intended to examine.

NCT ID: NCT06380764 Completed - Clinical trials for Postdural Puncture Headache

Greater Occipital Nerve Block Value in Management of Postdural Puncture Headache

Start date: March 2, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Neuraxial techniques are well tolerated and effective options for labor analgesia and anesthesia for caesarean section, and may protect high risk women against severe maternal morbidity. However, neuraxial techniques still have drawbacks especially postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and may be associated with chronic headache, back pain and postnatal depression. PDPH is a relatively common acute complication of neuraxial techniques that was traditionally considered benign and self-limiting, but it significantly impacts patients' general health and quality of life. Greater Occipital Nerve (GON) originates from C2-3 segments and through its muscular relations it is divided as proximal and distal parts; the most proximal part lies between obliquus capitis inferior and semispinalis and then passes through the semispinalis to pierce the trapezius muscle. In distal region of trapezius fascia, the GON is crossed by the occipital artery and exits the trapezius fascia into the nuchal line about 5-cm lateral to midline. Functionally, GON provides motor supplies to the muscles while passing through it and its main sensory supply is in the occipital region.

NCT ID: NCT05969119 Completed - Clinical trials for Postdural Puncture Headache

Addition of Pyridostigmine to Conventional Management of Postdural Puncture Headache

Start date: July 25, 2023
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a major complication of neuraxial anesthesia that can occur following spinal anesthesia and with inadvertent Dural puncture during epidural anesthesia. The presence of Pyridostigmine in CSF would be expected to increase the level of acetylcholine in CSF and subsequently in the brain through inhibition of cholinesterase. The increased level of acetylcholine would produce cerebral vasoconstriction.

NCT ID: NCT05777694 Completed - Pregnancy Related Clinical Trials

Postdural Punction Headache After Ceserian Section

Start date: February 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to compare the effect of spinal needle type on postdural puncture headache in patients who will undergo cesarean section. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: [Does spinal needle thickness affect postdural puncture headache?] [What is the response of patients who develop postdural puncture headache to treatment?] In cases accepting cesarean section operation under spinal anesthesia, different tables were used with spinal needles, and it will be questioned whether headache will develop in the first 15 days postoperatively. Postdural puncture headache after surgery will be described.

NCT ID: NCT04910477 Completed - Clinical trials for Postdural Puncture Headache

Nebulized Dexmedetomidine Versus Neostigmine/Atropine in Postdural Puncture Headache

Start date: June 1, 2021
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

In our study, we will compare a new route of nebulization for effectiveness between dexmedetomidine, neostigmine/atropine and saline placebo for females complained of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) after cesarean section.

NCT ID: NCT04892290 Completed - Clinical trials for Postdural Puncture Headache

Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for Postdural Puncture Headache

Start date: December 1, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Background: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH), which is one of the complications of spinal anesthesia, is a condition that negatively affects the quality of life of patients, causes late mobilization and prolonged hospital stay. Sphenopalatine ganglion block (SGB) has created a minimally invasive, easy, and safe treatment alternative. Objective: Evaluating the effectiveness of topical SGB on PDPH treatment. Design: Retrospective observational study Setting: Single center tertiary level of care hospital study. The files of PDPH patients between Jan 2018 and Jan 2020 were scanned. Patients: PDPH patients aged 18-65 are included and any patients with primary/secondary headache history are excluded. Main outcome measures: Patients were divided into 2 groups. The group that given only conservative treatment was named as Group C, and the group of patients who had additionally been applied SGB was named as Group SGB. Headache severity was measured with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at the 1st,3rd, 12th and 24th hours of the treatment, in supine and upright position.

NCT ID: NCT03652714 Completed - Clinical trials for Postdural Puncture Headache

The Effect of Ganglion Sphenopalatine Block (GSP-block) Versus Placebo on Postdural Puncture Headache

Start date: September 19, 2018
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of the ganglion sphenopalatine block (GSP block) on postdural puncture headache.

NCT ID: NCT03464253 Completed - Clinical trials for Postdural Puncture Headache

Prediction of Post-dural Puncture Headache in Parturients Undergoing Elective Caesarean Section

Start date: April 1, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

The parturients are at particular risk of post dural puncture headache (PDPH) because of their sex, young age, and the widespread application of spinal and epidural anesthesia. PDPH has a negative impact on quality of life, patient satisfaction, the postpartum experience with the mother's inability to bond with and care for her baby and it increases the economic burden associated with childbirth. Therefore, it is necessary to prevent or decrease its incidence and severity. TCD enables measurement of the blood flow velocity in intracranial arteries and its parameters are affected by both fluctuations in intracranial pressure and changes in cerebral vessel diameters. The possibility of equipment mobilization, the opportunity of repeated bedside technique together with the noninvasive nature, makes TCD measurements attractive in the attempt to estimate CBF and offers potential application to predict and follow patients with PDPH.

NCT ID: NCT02859233 Completed - Clinical trials for Postdural Puncture Headache

Role of Prophylaxis by Oral Fluid Supplementation in Prevention of Postdural Puncture Headache

PROPHYDRA
Start date: November 8, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is defined, according to the International Headache Society, as any headache develops within 5 days after a lumbar puncture. It worsens within 15 minutes after sitting or standing and improves within 15 minutes after lying. For preventing PDPH, there are some uncomfortable practices for patients (fluid supplementation and bed rest) and expensive for hospital (time spend for information and management of fluid intake). Patients are usually advised by nurses. If "bed rest" is not effective in prevention of PDPH, "fluid supplementation" is not an advice based on any evidence but only on routine. By this trial, the investigators want to evaluate the scientific value of this advice, in the standard patient care. The primary objective of this study is to compare oral hyperhydration (2 liters during 2 hours after lumbar puncture - the most common routine according to an internal pilot survey) versus no advice about the fluid intake to prevent the PDPH. The second objective is to observe the day of apparition of PDPH, between day 0 and day 5.

NCT ID: NCT02394457 Completed - Clinical trials for Postdural Puncture Headache

Cosyntropin Versus Epidural Blood Patch (EBP) for Treatment of Treatment of Post Dural Puncture Headache

PDPH
Start date: August 2010
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

PDPH is a common problem after either intentional or unintentional Dural puncture. It is especially common in young female patients and in patients undergoing Lumbar Puncture using the typical kit containing large 20 gauge needles (1). Hypothesis is that Cosyntropin therapy is at least as effective as current conservative therapy (caffeine/fluid) and/or Epidural Blood Patch. Patients will be randomly assigned to undergo either: (1) EBP with IVF therapy or (2)Cosyntropin IV with IVF therapy. Endpoints will be a pain score that is given prior to the procedure, Emergency Department (ED) discharge pain score and post procedural day (PPD) day 1, day 3 and day 7 pain and functional levels. Patients in Cosyntropin arm of the study may request crossover to EBP at anytime after a 24 hour assessment period is completed per Standard of Care for treatment of PDPH, in order to ensure no undue distress is placed on the patient in order to complete this study. Current treatments consist primarily of non-invasive treatment with intravenous fluids and caffeine therapy and invasive treatment by Epidural Blood Patch. Efficacy of Caffeine 300mg IV BID x 1d doses is approximately 70% (2). However this therapy has been linked to post-treatment seizures. EBP was originally thought to be 90% effective with repeat treatment efficacy approaching >96%. However more recent studies by Taivainen et al (3) have shown only a 61% rate of permanent cure. Additionally, EBP are contraindicated in patients with signs of increased intra-cranial pressure (ICP), coagulation issues, signs/symptoms of Central Nervous System (CNS) /systemic infection or local infection at the site of the EBP, thus resulting in decreased utility. Complications are also quite serious ranging from meningitis, spinal hematoma, repeat dural puncture, localized infection and vagal response to the procedure. EBP are not typically performed until after conservative measures have failed which leads to further prolongation of the patients decreased functional status and pain. Additionally, the cost of both treatments is substantial considering prolonged ED visits for conservative treatments often followed by the time and expense of an EBP. The goal of this investigation is to aid in the confirmation of case reports advocating the economy, efficacy and safety of synthetic Adrenal CorticTropin Hormone (ACTH) as a treatment of PDPH (4,5,6,7,8,9).