Presence of PTSD and Emotion Dysregulation Among Inpatients With Substance Use Disorder

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Clinical Trial

Official title:

Presence of PTSD and Emotion Dysregulation Among Inpatients With Substance Use Disorder; a Feasibility Study of a Combined Treatment for Difficulties in Emotion Regulation and PTSD

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06345053
• Other study ID #: 203428
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: May 1, 2021
• Est. completion date: October 1, 2025

Study information

• Verified date: April 2024
• Source: Norwegian University of Science and Technology
• Contact: Johanna Vigfusdottir
• Phone: +4746746154
• Email: johannavigfusd[@]gmail.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

There are high rates of co-occurring posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among patients receiving treatment for substance use disorder (SUD). PTSD and SUD should be treated simultaneously, but adults in SUD treatment are often not assessed for PTSD nor offered PTSD-based interventions. One of the reasons for reluctance in offering trauma focused treatment is increased risk of drop out. PTSD and related emotion dysregulation are related to elevated psychological burden, higher dropout rates and increased risk of relapse. this is a feasibility study, where the plan is to integrate a combination of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for Substance Use Disorder (DBT-SUD skills) a therapy targeting difficulties in emotion regulation and Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET) a trauma focused therapy, for patients with co-occurring PTSD symptoms into standard SUD treatment . The plan is to assess its potential benefits by assessing whether adding this combination to standard SUD treatment is relevant, feasible, acceptable, and safe. Treatment outcomes are 1) Prevalence of PTSD, suicidal behaviour, and self-harm, as well as the severity of difficulties in emotion regulation and emotional avoidance among patients (N approx. = 100) in inpatient treatment for SUD. 2) Change post-treatment and at 3 and 12 months follow up, from baseline in PTSD symptom severity, depressive symptoms, emotion regulation, emotion avoidance, and experience of shame. 3) Rates of dropout and relapse compared to previous rates.

This project can increase knowledge about psychological mechanisms in co-occurring PTSD and SUD and improve the quality of treatment for this vulnerable patient population.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 100
• Est. completion date: October 1, 2025
• Est. primary completion date: October 1, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• General inclusion criteria for the study:

1. Fit general inclusion criteria for the in-patient program.

2. Speak Scandinavian (Norwegian, Danish and/or Swedish).

3. Be willing to sign a consent.

Inclusion criteria for NET intervention:

1. Experience of an aversive event that fits criteria A for PTSD as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-V (DSM-V) (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013).

2. Experience symptoms of PTSD as defined by the DSM-V (APA, 2013), or subthreshold PTSD (Grubaugh et al., 2005), or experience clinically relevant symptoms as evaluated by a NET therapist.

1. Subthreshold PTSD is defined as having experienced a traumatic event (Criteria A), meeting Criteria B (re-experiencing symptoms), Criteria E (one-month symptom duration), and Criteria F (significant distress or functioning impairment) and either Criteria C (avoidance or numbing symptoms) or Criteria D (hyper arousal symptoms).

Inclusion criteria for DBT intervention:

1. Experience difficulties in emotion regulation evaluated by an assigned DBT therapist.

2. Manage to commit to participating in the DBT- skills training.

Exclusion Criteria:

• General exclusion criteria for the study:

1. Have a clinically significant low cognitive- and/or linguistic functioning that hinders the patient in understanding and answering the questions on the self-rapport instruments.

Exclusion criteria for NET and/or DBT-SUD skills

1. Being actively psychotic.

2. Have a Body Mass Index (BMI) under 17.

3. Severe dissociation.

4. An ongoing traumatic contact with the perpetrator.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Emotion Regulation
• Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
• Self-harm
• Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
• Stress Disorders, Traumatic
• Substance Use Disorders
• Substance-Related Disorders
• Suicide

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Narrative Exposure Therapy
The intervention period will be from (May 2021- October 2024). All patients will participate in standard treatment at MBS. Dialectical Behaviour Therapy -Substance Use Disorder skills training (DBT-SUD skills) will be offered to all patients at MBS in the project period that experience difficulties in emotion regulation and manage to commit to participating in the DBT- skills training evaluated by their DBT therapist. Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET) will be offered to all patients with relevant traumatic experience and symptoms of PTSD depending on clinical evaluation.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Norway	Molde Treatment Center, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust	Molde	Møre And Romsdal

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Norwegian University of Science and Technology	Møre og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Oslo University Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Norway, 

References & Publications (48)

Aasland OG, Amundsen A, Bovim G, Fauske S, Morland J. [Identification of patients at risk of alcohol related damage]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1990 May 10;110(12):1523-7. Norwegian. — View Citation

Battle DE. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). Codas. 2013;25(2):191-2. doi: 10.1590/s2317-17822013000200017. No abstract available. — View Citation

Bemmouna D, Coutelle R, Weibel S, Weiner L. Feasibility, Acceptability and Preliminary Efficacy of Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Autistic Adults without Intellectual Disability: A Mixed Methods Study. J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Oct;52(10):4337-4354. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05317-w. Epub 2021 Oct 9. — View Citation

Berman AH, Palmstierna T, Kallmen H, Bergman H. The self-report Drug Use Disorders Identification Test: Extended (DUDIT-E): reliability, validity, and motivational index. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007 Jun;32(4):357-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.10.001. Epub 2006 Dec 11. — View Citation

Brady, K. T., Back, S. E., & Coffey, S. F. (2004). Substance abuse and posttraumatic stress disorder. Current directions in psychological science, 13(5), 206-209.

Chesney E, Goodwin GM, Fazel S. Risks of all-cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: a meta-review. World Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;13(2):153-60. doi: 10.1002/wps.20128. — View Citation

Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB. — View Citation

Elbert, T., Hermenau, K., Hecker, T., Weierstall, R., & Schauer, M. (2012). FORNET: Behandlung von traumatisierten und nicht-traumatisierten Gewalttätern mittels Narrativer Expositionstherapie.

Elbert, T., Schauer, M., & Neuner, F. (2015). Narrative exposure therapy (NET): Reorganizing memories of traumatic stress, fear, and violence. In Evidence based treatments for trauma-related psychological disorders (pp. 229-253). Springer, Cham.

Espie CA, Farias Machado P, Carl JR, Kyle SD, Cape J, Siriwardena AN, Luik AI. The Sleep Condition Indicator: reference values derived from a sample of 200 000 adults. J Sleep Res. 2018 Jun;27(3):e12643. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12643. Epub 2017 Nov 29. — View Citation

EuroQol Group. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9. — View Citation

Goodman LA, Corcoran C, Turner K, Yuan N, Green BL. Assessing traumatic event exposure: general issues and preliminary findings for the Stressful Life Events Screening Questionnaire. J Trauma Stress. 1998 Jul;11(3):521-42. doi: 10.1023/A:1024456713321. — View Citation

Gratz, K. L. (2001). Measurement of deliberate self-harm: Preliminary data on the Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory. Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment, 23(4), 253-263.

Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment, 26(1), 41-54.

Grubaugh AL, Magruder KM, Waldrop AE, Elhai JD, Knapp RG, Frueh BC. Subthreshold PTSD in primary care: prevalence, psychiatric disorders, healthcare use, and functional status. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2005 Oct;193(10):658-64. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000180740.02644.ab. — View Citation

Harder DW, Cutler L, Rockart L. Assessment of shame and guilt and their relationships to psychopathology. J Pers Assess. 1992 Dec;59(3):584-604. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5903_12. — View Citation

Hogue A, Schumm JA, MacLean A, Bobek M. Couple and family therapy for substance use disorders: Evidence-based update 2010-2019. J Marital Fam Ther. 2022 Jan;48(1):178-203. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12546. Epub 2021 Aug 25. — View Citation

Kopelowicz A, Ventura J, Liberman RP, Mintz J. Consistency of Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale factor structure across a broad spectrum of schizophrenia patients. Psychopathology. 2008;41(2):77-84. doi: 10.1159/000111551. Epub 2007 Nov 23. — View Citation

Kroenke K. & Spitzer R.L. (2002) The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatric Annals 32:509-521.

Linehan, M. (2014). DBT? Skills training manual. Guilford Publications.

Linehan, M. M. (1993). Skills training manual for treating borderline personality disorder. Guilford Press.

Lopez-Castro T, Smith KZ, Nicholson RA, Armas A, Hien DA. Does a history of violent offending impact treatment response for comorbid PTSD and substance use disorders? A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Feb;97:47-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 24. No abstract available. — View Citation

McGovern MP, Carroll KM. Evidence-based practices for substance use disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;26(4):991-1010. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(03)00073-x. — View Citation

Mills KL, Teesson M, Ross J, Peters L. Trauma, PTSD, and substance use disorders: findings from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Apr;163(4):652-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.4.652. — View Citation

Najavits LM, Schmitz M, Gotthardt S, Weiss RD. Seeking Safety plus Exposure Therapy: an outcome study on dual diagnosis men. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2005 Dec;37(4):425-35. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2005.10399816. — View Citation

Najavits, L. M. (2014). Creating change: A new past-focused model for trauma and substance abuse. In P. Ouimette & J. P. Read (Eds.), Trauma and substance abuse: Causes, consequences, and treatment of comorbid disorders (2nd ed., pp. 281-303). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14273-014

Neacsiu AD, Eberle JW, Kramer R, Wiesmann T, Linehan MM. Dialectical behavior therapy skills for transdiagnostic emotion dysregulation: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Behav Res Ther. 2014 Aug;59:40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 May 27. — View Citation

Otto MW, Hearon BA, McHugh RK, Calkins AW, Pratt E, Murray HW, Safren SA, Pollack MH. A randomized, controlled trial of the efficacy of an interoceptive exposure-based CBT for treatment-refractory outpatients with opioid dependence. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2014 Nov-Dec;46(5):402-11. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2014.960110. — View Citation

Ouimette PC, Brown PJ, Najavits LM. Course and treatment of patients with both substance use and posttraumatic stress disorders. Addict Behav. 1998 Nov-Dec;23(6):785-95. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(98)00064-1. — View Citation

Ouimette, P., Moos, R. H., & Brown, P. J. (2003). Substance use disorder-posttraumatic stress disorder comorbidity: A survey of treatments and proposed practice guidelines. In P. Ouimette & P. J. Brown (Eds.), Trauma and substance abuse: Causes, consequences, and treatment of comorbid disorders (pp. 91-110). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10460-005

Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, Brent DA, Yershova KV, Oquendo MA, Currier GW, Melvin GA, Greenhill L, Shen S, Mann JJ. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;168(12):1266-77. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704. — View Citation

Post-traumatic stress disorder. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2018 Dec. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542453/ — View Citation

Roberts NP, Roberts PA, Jones N, Bisson JI. Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD010204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010204.pub2. — View Citation

Roemer, L., Litz, B. T., Orsillo, S. M., & Wagner, A. W. (2001). A preliminary investigation of the role of strategic withholding of emotions in PTSD. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 14(1), 149-156.

Saraiya T, Lopez-Castro T. Ashamed and Afraid: A Scoping Review of the Role of Shame in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). J Clin Med. 2016 Nov 1;5(11):94. doi: 10.3390/jcm5110094. — View Citation

Sinha R. Stress and addiction: a dynamic interplay of genes, environment, and drug intake. Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Jul 15;66(2):100-1. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.05.003. No abstract available. — View Citation

Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. — View Citation

Stenmark H, Guzey IC, Elbert T, Holen A. Gender and offender status predicting treatment success in refugees and asylum seekers with PTSD. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2014 Jan 30;5. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v5.20803. eCollection 2014. — View Citation

Taylor CT, Laposa JM, Alden LE. Is avoidant personality disorder more than just social avoidance? J Pers Disord. 2004 Dec;18(6):571-94. doi: 10.1521/pedi.18.6.571.54792. — View Citation

Tull MT, Gratz KL, Coffey SF, Weiss NH, McDermott MJ. Examining the interactive effect of posttraumatic stress disorder, distress tolerance, and gender on residential substance use disorder treatment retention. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Sep;27(3):763-73. doi: 10.1037/a0029911. Epub 2012 Sep 3. Erratum In: Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Sep;27(3):743. — View Citation

van de Glind G, van den Brink W, Koeter MW, Carpentier PJ, van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen K, Kaye S, Skutle A, Bu ET, Franck J, Konstenius M, Moggi F, Dom G, Verspreet S, Demetrovics Z, Kapitany-Foveny M, Fatseas M, Auriacombe M, Schillinger A, Seitz A, Johnson B, Faraone SV, Ramos-Quiroga JA, Casas M, Allsop S, Carruthers S, Barta C, Schoevers RA; IASP Research Group; Levin FR. Validity of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) as a screener for adult ADHD in treatment seeking substance use disorder patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Oct 1;132(3):587-96. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.04.010. Epub 2013 May 6. — View Citation

Van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Schuengel, C. (1996). The measurement of dissociation in normal and clinical populations: Meta-analytic validation of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES). Clinical Psychology Review, 16(5), 365-382.

Vanderplasschen W, Vandevelde S, Broekaert E., (2014). Therapeutic communities for treating addictions in Europe. Evidence, current practices and future challenges. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Vigfusdottir, J., Dale, K. Y., Gratz, K. L., Klonsky, E. D., Jonsbu, E., & Høidal, R. (2020). The psychometric properties and clinical utility of the Norwegian versions of the deliberate self-harm inventory and the inventory of statements about self-injury. Current Psychology, 1-11.

Vigfusdottir, J., Hoidal, R., Breivik, E., Jonsbu, E., Dale, K. Y. & Mork, E. (2023). The Norwegian version of the Personal Feelings Questionnaire-2: The translation, clinical utility, and psychometric properties. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Weathers FW, Bovin MJ, Lee DJ, Sloan DM, Schnurr PP, Kaloupek DG, Keane TM, Marx BP. The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation in military veterans. Psychol Assess. 2018 Mar;30(3):383-395. doi: 10.1037/pas0000486. Epub 2017 May 11. — View Citation

Weathers, F. W., Litz, B. T., Keane, T. M., Palmieri, P. A., Marx, B. P., & Schnurr, P. P. (2013). The ptsd checklist for dsm-5 (pcl-5). Scale available from the National Center for PTSD at www. ptsd. va. gov, 10.

Westphal, M., Aldao, A., & Jackson, C. (2017). Emotion dysregulation in comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and substance use disorders: A narrative review. Military Psychology, 29(3), 216-233.

* Note: There are 48 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	The intervention is relevant - prevalence of PTSD /SUP PTSD.	The prevalence of PTSD/SUB-PTSD is measured with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) a 30-item structured interview used to make current (past month) diagnosis of PTSD, make lifetime diagnosis of PTSD, and assess PTSD symptoms over the past week (Weathers et al., 2018). Frequency and intensity rating is summed to create an overall PTSD symptom severity score and is used to generate a categorical diagnosis (PTSD/Sub-PTSD vs non-PTSD). In this project, we will both use the categorical diagnosis to compare those with and without PTSD/Sub-PTSD, as using the overall PTSD symptom severity scores (Weathers et al., 2018).	One time assessment 5 weeks after admission to treatment
Primary	The intervention is relevant - prevalence of traumatic experiences.	The prevalence of traumatic experiences also as offenders is measured with Stressful Life Events Screening Questionnaire-Revised (SLESQ) is self-report instrument designed to map and assess 15 potentially traumatic experiences (Goodman et al., 1998). The score is used to identify experiences of potential traumatic events. For this project, items asking about experiences where the participant caused potentially traumatic experiences to others are added. This is to identify violent offenders.	One time assessment 5 weeks after admission to treatment
Primary	The intervention is relevant - The severitiy of difficulties in emotion regulation.	The severity of difficulties in emotion regulation will be measured with Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) is a self-report instrument consisting of 36 items meant to measure difficulties in emotion regulation, higher scores ranging from 36- 144 indicate more significant difficulties in emotion regulation (Gratz & Roemer, 2004). We will use the cut score of 97 to identify severe difficulties in emotion regulation (Bemmouna et. Al 2022; Neacsiu et. al., 2014).	One time assessment 5 weeks after admission to treatment
Primary	The intervention is feasible, accepted and safe - The dropout rate from treatment.	The dropout rate from the standard treatment, DBT- SUD skills and NET. Dropout is registered, and dichotomous variables are created (yes/no). In case of dropout, time from admission to dropout is registered.	From treatment start to compleation up to 9 months.
Primary	The intervention is safe - Suicide behaviour while in treatment.	Prevalance of suicide behavior before treatment and while in treatment is registrert with the Columbia-suicide severity rating scale (C-SSRS) a suicidal ideation and behaviour-rating interview created to evaluate suicide risk. The interview consists of 10 categories with binary responses (yes/no) to indicate a presence or absence of the behaviour. The outcome of the C-SSRS is a numerical score obtained from the categories (Posner et.al. 2011). The participants Answer the interview 5 weeks from treatment start and at treatment compleation.	From treatment start to compleation up to 9 months.
Primary	The intervention is safe - Self-harm behaviour while in treatment.	Prevelance of Self-harm behaviour before tratment and while in treatment is registrert with The Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory (DSHI). DSHI is a 17 -item behaviourally based, self-report instrument to assess deliberate self-harm (Gratz, 2001). In this project we create a continuous variable on frequency of self-harm behaviour and a dichotomous variable on presence of self-harm (Yes/No). e of the C-SSRS is a numerical score obtained from the categories (Posner et.al. 2011). The participants answer the DSHI at 5 weeks from treatment start and at treatment compleation.	From treatment start to compleation up to 9 months.
Primary	The intervention is accepted - participation in DBT-SUD skills sessions.	The percentage of DBT-SUD skills sessions participated in, as well as the percentage completion of homework.	From treatment start to compleation up to 9 months.
Primary	The intervention is feasible and accepted - Objective experience of treatment.	A self-rapport questionnaire is designed to evaluate the experience of the treatment. Rating on a 5 Likert scale how different elements of the treatment are experienced on a 5-point scale. There are also open-ended questions about what in the treatment is most useful and what was the least helpful (see attachment 1-2 in protocol)	From treatment start to treatment compleation up to 9 months.
Secondary	The potential benefits of the intervention - Change in PTSD symptoms from base line to 3-and 12 month follow up.	Evaluate the change post-treatment and at 3 and 12 months follow up, from baseline in PTSD symptom severity, measured with PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), a self-report instrument developed for quick screening of PTSD symptoms. Sum scores range from 0-80, with a score over 33 indicating the presence of PTSD (Weathers et al., 2013).	From 5 weeks after admission to treatment to 12-month follow upp after treatment completion. Up to 21 months.
Secondary	The potential benefits of the intervention - Change in Difficulties in emotion regulation from baseline to 3- to 12- month follow up.	difficulties in emotion regulation measured with Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) a self-report instrument consisting of 36 items meant to measure difficulties in emotion regulation, higher scores ranging from 36- 144 indicate more significant difficulties in emotion regulation (Gratz & Roemer, 2004). We will use the cut score of 97 to identify severe difficulties in emotion regulation (Bemmouna et. Al 2022; Neacsiu et. al., 2014).	From 5 weeks after admission to treatment to 12-month follow upp after treatment completion. Up to 21 months.
Secondary	The potential benefits of the intervention - Relapse to alcohol abuse at 3- and 12-months follow up.	Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) is a 10-item screening instrument to assess severity of alcohol consumption, drinking behaviours, and alcohol-related problems. Audit scores range from 0-40 with higher scores indicating greater problems related to alcohol consumptions (Aasland, Amundsen, Bovi, Fauske & Mørland, 1990). In this project, the consumption score (question 1) with cut-of score 3 and over (drinking alcohol 2 -3 times a week) is coded into a dichotomous variable of current alcohol use (yes/no) and sum score used to assess severity of alcohol related problems. At 3 months or 12 months evaluation a cut-off score 3 and over on question 1 is registered as relapse.	From treatment completion to 3- and 12 month follow up - up to 12 months.
Secondary	The potential benefits of the intervention - Relapse to substance abuse at 3- and 12-month follow up.	Realalse to substance abuse is evaluated with the Drug Use Disorder Identification Test (DUDIT), a nine item self-report instrument developed for identification of individuals with drug-related problems. DUDIT scores range from 0-44 with higher scores indicating more drug use and drug related problems (Berman, Palmstierna, Källmén, & Bergman, 2007). In this project, the substance use frequency score (question 1) is used to identify current substance use with cut-off score score 3 and over (using substances 2-3 times a week) will be coded into a dichotomous variable (yes/no). The sum score is used to assess severity of substance related problems. At 3 months or 12 months evaluation a cut-off score 3 and over on question 1 is registered as relapse.	From treatment completion to 3- and 12 month follow up - up to 12 months.