Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02216383
Other study ID # 3344
Secondary ID 2014-001948-37
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date February 2015
Est. completion date October 30, 2018

Study information

Verified date August 2018
Source North Bristol NHS Trust
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

A quarter of all pregnancy and child-birth related deaths are due to excessive bleeding after the birth, "post-partum haemorrhage" (PPH). In the UK, PPH affects approx 10% of new mothers. PPH can be frightening for women and cause them to need additional treatments prolonging their hospital stay.

Commonly PPH is caused by an inadequately contracted womb after childbirth. Giving the mother an injection of "uterotonic" medicine following the birth of their baby can prevent this. It reduces the risk of PPH by 66%.

In the UK, the two medicines most commonly used are Syntocinon and Syntometrine. Syntometrine is longer acting, but a published review of trials concluded that Syntometrine is no better at preventing severe blood loss. Syntometrine is associated with more side effects including nausea, vomiting, and high blood pressure, and has been linked with rare, but fatal, cases of stroke. All guidelines therefore recommend Syntocinon for preventing PPH.Following a telephone survey of all maternity units in the UK, 71.4% of units still routinely use Syntometrine.

Carbetocin is a newer medicine, already widely used after caesarean section, but not yet after vaginal birth. Other studies have shown that Carbetocin is slightly better at preventing bleeding after birth when compared to Syntometrine, has fewer side effects than Syntometrine, and that it may be just as good as Syntocinon at preventing PPH. No studies have directly compared all three medicines or compared their overall cost; information vital to the NHS.

Investigators propose a trial of 5712 women over 13 months, in four maternity units to compare the effectiveness, side effects and cost of Syntocinon, Syntometrine and Carbetocin, for women having a vaginal birth.

Women will be randomly allocated to receive one of these drugs. Women and staff will not know which drug they receive. Staff will collect data such as the number of extra drugs and treatments needed and the volume of blood lost. Women will be asked to complete a side effects questionnaire. Investigators will perform an analysis of cost effectiveness once all results are available.

Aim: To directly compare the effectiveness, side effects and cost of Syntocinon, Syntometrine and Carbetocin given intramuscularly to prevent PPH in the 3rd stage of labour.


Description:

BACKGROUND Around a quarter of all global pregnancy and child-birth related deaths are due to excessive bleeding after the birth of the baby and placenta, or "post-partum haemorrhage" (PPH). In the UK, PPH affects approximately 10% of new mothers. PPH can be extremely frightening for women and can cause them to need additional treatments including blood transfusion and removal of the womb as well as prolonging their hospital stay.

The most common cause of PPH is an inadequately contracted womb after childbirth. Giving the mother an injection of "uterotonic" medicine following the birth of their baby can prevent this. It reduces the risk of PPH by 66% and this should routinely be offered to all labouring women.

In the UK, the two medicines most commonly used for this purpose are Syntocinon and Syntometrine. Both mimic natural hormones. Syntometrine is longer acting, but a published review of trials comparing these two medicines concluded that Syntometrine is no better at preventing severe blood loss. Syntometrine is associated with more side effects including nausea, vomiting, and high blood pressure, and has been linked with rare, but fatal, cases of stroke. All guidelines therefore recommend Syntocinon for preventing PPH.

Our group conducted a telephone survey of all maternity units in the UK, and found that 71.4% of units still routinely use Syntometrine. Investigators estimate that 40,000-70,000 women per year are experiencing distressing nausea and vomiting in the emotionally important first few hours following childbirth. These women are also receiving a medicine with the potential to cause dangerous high blood pressure.

Carbetocin is a newer medicine, already widely used after caesarean section, but not yet after vaginal birth. Other studies have shown that Carbetocin is slightly better at preventing bleeding after birth when compared to Syntometrine, that it has fewer side effects than Syntometrine, and that it may be just as good as Syntocinon at preventing PPH. No studies have directly compared all three medicines or compared their overall cost; information vital to the NHS.

METHOD Investigators propose a trial of 5712 women over 13 months, in four maternity units in the South-West to compare the effectiveness, side effects and cost of Syntocinon, Syntometrine and Carbetocin, for women having a vaginal birth.

Women will be randomly allocated to receive one of these drugs. Women and staff will not know which drug they receive, so as not to influence the results collected. Staff will collect data such as the number of extra drugs and treatments needed and the volume of blood lost. Women will be asked to complete a side effects questionnaire. Investigators will perform an analysis of cost effectiveness once all results are available.

AIMS To directly compare the effectiveness, side effects and cost of Syntocinon, Syntometrine and Carbetocin given intramuscularly to prevent PPH in the 3rd stage of labour.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 5798
Est. completion date October 30, 2018
Est. primary completion date August 31, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- =18 years of age at time of delivery

- Singleton pregnancy

- Vaginal birth (spontaneous and instrumental)

- >24 weeks gestation

Exclusion Criteria:

- Significant APH (>50ml) or suspected or proven placenta abruption

- Maternal coagulation disorder

- Intrauterine fetal death

- Patients who would decline blood products if required

- Known or suspected hypertensive disorders, including pre-eclampsia, pregnancy induced hypertension, essential hypertension (even if blood pressure well controlled)

- Hypertension in labour, or patients who have not had their blood pressure checked in labour

- Patients with peripheral, hepatic or cardiac disease

- Patients with an allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the active ingredients in Carbetocin, Syntometrine or Syntocinon

- Epilepsy

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Carbetocin
The intervention is the administration of one dose of study drug to the recruited patient at the time of delivery. Carbetocin, listed here, is one of the of the three study drugs.
Syntocinon
The intervention is the administration of one dose of study drug to the recruited patient at the time of delivery. Syntocinon, listed here, is one of the of the three study drugs.
Syntometrine
The intervention is the administration of one dose of study drug to the recruited patient at the time of delivery. Syntometrine, listed here, is one of the of the three study drugs.

Locations

Country Name City State
United Kingdom Royal United Hospital NHS Trust Bath Somerset
United Kingdom North Bristol NHS Trust Bristol Avon
United Kingdom Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust Gloucester Gloucestershire
United Kingdom Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Nottingham
United Kingdom Great Western Hospital Swindon

Sponsors (7)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
North Bristol NHS Trust Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, University of Bristol, University of the West of England

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Requirement for additional uterotonic drugs within 24 hours of birth Proportion of patients requiring additional uterotonic drugs after administration of study drug From administration of prophylactic uterotonic agent to discharge from labour ward, within an expected average of 6 hours.
Secondary Estimated volume of blood loss at delivery Estimated volume of blood loss at delivery Within 24 hours of delivery
Secondary Transfusion of blood products (type and number of units given) Number of units of blood transfused, or volume of own blood returned to patient if intraoperative cell salvage used From delivery until transfer from Labour Ward, within an expected average of 6 hours.
Secondary Manual removal of placenta in theatre The requirement for the placenta to be removed in theatre From delivery until transfer from Labour Ward
Secondary Requirement for surgical intervention to manage PPH As a result of significant PPH a surgical intervention was required to manage the PPH From delivery until transfer from Labour Ward, within an expected average of 2 days
Secondary Maternal hypertension Hypertension First two postnatal hours following administration of study drug
Secondary Maternal hypotension BP <90/60 In first two postnatal hours
Secondary Maternally-reported health-related quality of life health-related quality of life reported by mother 24 hours after delivery and 14 days after delivery
Secondary Abdominal pain in the first two postnatal hours, recorded in Case Report Form (CRF) by midwife Patient reported secondary outcome First 2 post natal hours
Secondary Post-partum vomiting Patient reported secondary outcome First 2 post natal hours
Secondary Need for anti-emetic Patient reported secondary outcome
By definition, labour starts when the patient is at least 3-4cm dilated with regular, painful contractions.
First 2 post natal hours
Secondary Headache Patient reported secondary outcome First two post natal hours
Secondary Maternal experience of side effects Captured using maternal side effects questionnaire In first two post natal hours
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT02303418 - Carbetocin Versus Oxytocin in the Prevention of Post Partum Haemorrhage (PPH) in Women Undergoing Caesarean Sections for Placenta Previa: A Randomised Controlled Trial Phase 3
Recruiting NCT00344929 - Severe Post Partum Haemorrhage (PPH): A Randomized Trial on Transversal Intervention in 6 French Perinatal Networks N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05336838 - Improving Management of Post-partum Haemorrhage With Quantra® System
Completed NCT02775773 - Clinical Study to Assess the Equivalence of Tranexamic Acid vs Oxytocin in Reducing the PPH Phase 3
Completed NCT01571323 - Combined Use of Oxytocin and Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin Infusion and Misoprostol Alone to Reduce Blood Loss at Cesarean Section Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT02908126 - Compare Efficacy of Oxytocin Administrations on Postpartum Uterine Contractility Phase 1
Terminated NCT02900690 - Health Economics Evaluation of the Management of Severe Postpartum Hemorrhage: Comparison of Recombinant Activated Factor VII Strategy to the Reference Strategy