Randomized Trial of Rectal Indomethacin and Papillary Spray of Epinephrine Versus Rectal Indomethacin to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis — INDIEH  

Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis Clinical Trial

Official title: A Randomized Trial of Rectal Indomethacin and Papillary Spray of Epinephrine Versus Rectal Indomethacin to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in High Risk Patients

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

This research is being done to see if using a combination of rectal indomethacin and epinephrine spray during endoscopy, can prevent pancreatitis that may occur after ERCP (a type of gastrointestinal endoscopy).

Clinical Trial Description

Background: Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with an estimated incidence of 3-7% among average risk patients and 15-20% among patients at high risk for developing PEP. Around 500,000 - 700,000 ERCPs are performed annually in U.S. Even with a modest incidence of 5%, PEP results in approximately $150 million in healthcare costs in the US alone.

A recent landmark controlled trial demonstrated the superiority of rectal nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug - NSAIDs (indomethacin) over placebo in preventing PEP among patients at high risk for PEP. Also, epinephrine sprayed on the major duodenal papilla was shown to reduce the incidence of PEP in multiple studies. Our group performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) which simultaneously compared 16 drugs evaluated in 99 randomized controlled trials with 25,313 patients, to determine their relative efficacy using direct and indirect comparisons. Interestingly, the NMA ranked epinephrine as the best performing drug, followed by rectal NSAIDs and nafamostat.

Indomethacin acts on pancreatic inflammation while epinephrine sprayed on duodenal papilla keeps the pancreatic duct open by reducing papillary edema. The use of these drugs in combination may potentially synergistically reduce or further reduce the incidence of PEP.

Hypothesis: A combination of papillary spray of epinephrine and rectal indomethacin is superior to the use of rectal indomethacin alone, for PEP prophylaxis among patients at high risk for PEP.

Sample size justification: Based on the information from earlier controlled trials, the Investigators assume that PEP incidence will be 10% in the rectal NSAID arm (Group A) and it will be reduced to 5% by the additional use of papillary spray of epinephrine (Group B). Therefore, a total of 474 patients in each arm, or 948 patients in total, will be required to see a 50% difference between the groups with a power of 0.8 and two sided alpha of 0.05.

Recruitment and Consenting: Patients scheduled to undergo ERCP will be screened for patient based inclusion / exclusion criteria and will be consented, in the private waiting area of the endoscopy units.

Randomization procedures and delivery of drugs: During ERCP performed according to standard clinical care, if the endoscopist determines that the patient meets the criteria for 'high-risk', the study coordinator will randomize the patient to either group A or B in a 1:1 fashion using a web-based central randomization system. Randomization will be stratified by each center and a randomly varying block size will be used. The patients will be randomized to either Group A - Patients will receive 20 ml of normal saline sprayed on the duodenal papilla and surrounding regions of edema, over a period of 1 minute using any ERCP cannulation catheter, at the end of procedure, just before the withdrawal of endoscope; followed by 100 mg of rectal indomethacin OR Group B - Patients will receive 20 ml of 0.02% epinephrine sprayed on the duodenal papilla and surrounding regions of edema, over a period of 1 minute using any ERCP cannulation catheter, at the end of procedure, just before the withdrawal of endoscope; followed by 100 mg of rectal indomethacin.

Statistical Plan: For the statistical analysis of primary end point, the difference in proportion of PEP among the two groups will be calculated by stratifying the site and by combining patients from all sites, as separate analyses. A two sided p-value of <0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The severity of PEP, mortality and other complications related to PEP will also be compared among the two groups. The data on the risk factors of PEP, incidence of PEP will be used for the development of PEP risk

Data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) charter: An Independent DSMB, clinical trial monitor (safety officer) will be formed consisting of five endoscopists from India and U.S., with expertise in biostatistics and clinical trial methodology. DSMB will review study related documentation including and not limited to, protocol, standard operating procedures, consent form, data entry forms; monitor study performance, will ensure adherence to good clinical practice guidelines and regulatory requirements; and will make appropriate recommendations to the investigators. All adverse events, will be reported to the safety officer by the study coordinators at each center. Blinded interim analysis will be performed at 33% and 66% of the sample size. If the PEP incidence or complication rate is >25% in any of the treatment groups, DSMB will break randomization code and will terminate the study. During interim analysis, if a statistically significant difference is found between the two groups (p<0.001), the study will be terminated for ethical considerations. ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Pancreatitis
• Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis

• NCT number: NCT02116309
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: Johns Hopkins University
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: August 2014
• Completion date: December 2, 2016