View clinical trials related to Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis.
Filter by:Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancrepatography (ERCP) acute pancreatitis (PEAP) is a frequent complication of this endoscopic procedure. Chronic statin intake has been linked to lower incidence and severity of acute pancreatitis (AP). Periprocedural rectal administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is protective against PEP, but the role of chronic acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) treatment is unclear. The aim of the study is to investigate whether statins and chronic ASA intake are associated with lower risk of PEAP.
This study will explore the efficacies of several practical short-term (peri-procedural) intravenous fluid regimens in the prevention of post- endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). PEP is the most common serious ERCP-related adverse event (AE), occurring in 5-15% of patients, and associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilization. Given the current lack of data on effectiveness of short-term fluid regimens in PEP prevention to inform practice, the results of the proposed study have the strong potential to impact ERCP practices worldwide, whether positive or negative.
Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common complication after ERCP, which was associated with occasional mortality, prolonged hospital days and increased health costs. Some studies investigated the effectiveness of different Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for prevent PEP. However, several high-quality RCTs and meta-analyses consistently demonstrated only100mg rectal indomethacin or diclofenac significantly reduced PEP incidence compared with placebos. Thus, European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic surgery guidelines recommended rountine administration of 100mg rectal indomethacin or diclofenac in unselected patients who underwent ERCP. Up to date, the mechanisms of NSAIDs in preventing pancreatitis were not fully elucidated. Diclofenac and Indomethacin showed similar inhibitory effects in phospholipase A2 and cyclooxygenase pathways. And the peak concentration of diclofenac and indomethacin both occurs between 30 and 90 min after rectal administration. However, diclofenac may be a stronger inhibitor of other pancreatitis-related imflammatory siginals (e.g. nuclear factor kappa-B) than indomethacin. Recently, several meta-analyses found 100mg rectal diclofenac to be more efficacious than 100mg rectal indomethacin. Despite these data, there is no conclusive evidence to prove that rectal diclofenac could provide incremental benefits over indomethacin from high-quality randomized, controlled trials. Therefore, the investigators conducted a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of rectal diclofenac versus indomethacin for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis in average-risk patients.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare rectal indomethacin alone versus combined pancreatic duct stenting and rectal indomethacin in prevention of post ERCP pancreatitis. The main question it aims to answer is: whether rectal indomethacin alone is superior to combination of pancreatic duct stenting and rectal indomethacin in prevention of post ERCP pancreatitis Participants will be patients who give consent to the study and who are required to undergo ERCP as part of their standard care. If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare [rectal indomethacin alone versus combined pancreatic duct stenting and rectal indomethacin in prevention of post ERCP pancreatitis.] to see if [whether rectal indomethacin alone is superior to combination of pancreatic duct stenting and rectal indomethacin in prevention of post ERCP pancreatitis].
This observational, prospective study aims at evaluating how the occurrence of post-Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography (ERCP) acute pancreatitis (PEP) could be influenced by difficult biliary cannulation that might be previously assessed by the morphological appearance of native major papilla in all the patients undergoing ERCP. The rate of successful biliary cannulation across papilla types could be used as intraprocedural quality and competence metrics during training. Moreover, recognizing difficult papillae could allow reserving those to experts to decrease the odds of failed cannulation.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an essential procedure that can be complicated by post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Indomethacin and ketorolac are two medications used to prevent PEP. The main reason for this research study is to compare the effectiveness these drugs at reducing rates of PEP. There have been no studies comparing the effectiveness of these medications in preventing PEP in pediatric patients. You are being asked to take part in this research study because you are scheduled to have an ERCP as part of your medical care.
A difficult cannulation has been identified as one of the high risk factors for developing post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). The accessibility and morphology of the papilla influence the level of cannulation difficulty. The use of a forceps to assist in the cannulation is a demonstrated effective technique for cannulating papillae that are difficult to access. Thus, the objective of our study is to determine whether a forceps assisted cannulation leads to less difficult cannulation during ERCP. Because difficult cannulation is associated with increased risk of PEP, our study investigates whether the forceps assisted cannulation also reduces the incidence of PEP as a secondary outcome. Eligible patients who have consented will either be randomized to cannulation with forceps or cannulation with no forceps.
The aim of this study is to use a validated patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate how many patients have symptoms of pancreatitis after ERCP and how it correlates with their quality of life and productivity.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) comes with a risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), which accounts for considerable morbidity, high healthcare expenditure, and death. The pathophysiology of PEP and the underpinnings of the preventive effect of rectal NSAID (RN) is poorly understood. Guidelines advise to take preventive measures with a single dose of 100mg RN, peri-ERCP. While NSAID administration reduces the risk with 40%, PEP still occurs after ERCP. In addition, patients with a PEP history have a higher risk to develop recurrence after a subsequent ERCP. This might suggest that an underlying genetic risk may contribute to increasing the incidence of PEP in some patients.
This research is being done to see if using oral tacrolimus before endoscopy, can prevent pancreatitis that may occur after ERCP (a type of gastrointestinal endoscopy).