View clinical trials related to Polyps.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to assess whether computer aided technology (CAD) can help in the diagnosis of polyps found the bowel compared with visual inspection alone and therefore whether it is beneficial in helping clinicians to decide whether to remove a polyp or not. Presently, most endoscopists remove all polyps found and send them to the laboratory for testing. The number of colonoscopies is increasing, meaning that more polyps are detected and removed. This comes at a significant cost to the health service and increases the time taken to complete a colonoscopy.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) has become the third most common malignant tumor and is the second leading cause of cancer related deaths worldwide. Adenomatous polyps of the colon are possible precursor lesions for CRC. Screening for CRC has been shown effective in preventing CRC and related deaths, especially colonoscopy and resection of adenomatous polyps. Currently, for intermediate sized polyps 5 - 20 mm hot snare polypectomy (HSP) with the use of electrocautery is conventionally used, causing relevant adverse events including haemorrhage and postpolypectomy coagulation syndrome, but is safe regarding complete resection of the polyp due to burning effect on residual tissue. On the other hand, cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has grown popularity. Absence of electrocautery makes it technically easier and most important reduces adverse events. CSP is recommended as the preferred technique for polyps <5 mm by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines. In literature, there is one multicenter trial from Japan recommending CSP for polyps 4-9 mm (average polyp size 5,4 mm) and only a few case studies for polyps 10-15 mm with inconsistent results, especially regarding the complete resection and pathological evaluation of the specimen. In this feasibility trial, the investigators try to find out if CSP with a new designed polypectomy snare is efficient and safe in terms of complete resection (R0), pathological evaluation and adverse events.
Patients who met the criteria for removal of 10-19mm colorectal polyps using cold snare or hot snare were included in the study, signed by endoscopic treatment written informed consent for surgery, patients with detailed tracking and record the basic information and information related to the operation, postoperative lack of region and edge endoscopic observation carefully no residue, additional excision may be took if necessary，after resection specimen inspection, and in 6 months review colonoscopy, assess whether there is residual or recurrence of polyps.Main outcome: technical success rate (no other auxiliary resection), complete resection rate, secondary outcome: intraoperative and postoperative complications, polypectomy time and related costs, influential factors of incomplete resection.Research significance: The effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of cold and hot snare resection of 10-19mm colorectal polyps were compared, and the influencing factors of incomplete polyps resection were analyzed, so as to provide evidence for the decision on the best method of medium-size polyps resection.
The identification of risk factors of colorectal/gastric polyp is more helpful for preventing colorectal cancer. And modifiable factors (such as high-fat diet, abnormal blood lipid, smoking, lack of exercise, obesity), and unmodifiable factors (including age, gender, race, familial adenomas, genetic)) can affect the risk of polyps. Thus early studying risk factors are the key to improving prognosis. what's more, early detection and timely treatment have important clinical significance for preventing and reducing the occurrence of gastrointestinal cancer.
This study is an open label, unblinded, non-randomized interventional study, comparing the investigational artificial intelligence tool with the current "gold standard": Data acquisition will be obtained during one scheduled colonoscopic procedure by a trained endoscopist. During insertion, no action will be taken, colonoscopy is performed following the standard of care. Once withdrawal is started, a second observer (not a trained endoscopist but person trained in polyp recognition) will start the bedside Artificial intelligence (AI) tool, connected to the endoscope's tower, for detection. This second observer is trained in assessing endoscopic images to define the AI tool's outcome. Due to the second observer watching the separate AI screen, the endoscopist is blinded of the AI outcome. When a detection is made by the AI system that is not recognized by the endoscopist, the endoscopist will be asked to relocate that same detection and to reassess the lesion and the possible need of therapeutic action. All detections are separately counted and categorized by the second observer. All polyp detections will be removed following standard of care for histological assessment. The entire colonoscopic procedure is recorded via a separate linked video-recorder.
Background We are developing artificial intelligence based polyp histology prediction (AIPHP) method to automatically classify Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) magnifying colonoscopy images to predict the non-neoplastic or neoplastic histology of polyps. Aim Our aim was to analyse the accuracy of AIPHP and NICE classification based histology predictions and also to compare the results of the two methods. Methods We examined colorectal polyps obtained from colonoscopy patients who had polypectomy or endoscopic mucosectomy. Polyps detected by white light colonoscopy were observed then by using NBI at the optical maximum magnificent (60x). The obtained and stored NBI magnifying images were analysed by NICE classification and by AIPHP method parallelly. Pathology examinations were performed blinded to the NICE and AIPHP diagnosis, as well. Our AIPHP software is based on a machine learning method. This program measures five geometrical and colour features on the endoscopic image.
Gallbladder polyps are often detected incidentally by ultrasonography. The most of gallbladder polyps are non-neoplastic such as cholesterol polyps and do not need further treatments. However, neoplastic polyps, which need additional treatments to prevent malignancy, show the same appearance on ultrasound. Clinically, the differential diagnosis between cholesterol polyps and adenomatous polyps is very important for patient follow-up and treatment. However, differential diagnosis between these two conditions is difficult using conventional trans-abdominal ultrasound. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is less affected and disturbed by subcutaneous fat or intraabdominal air, so a clearer image of pancreatobiliary system can be obtained. In addition, EUS elastography and contrast enhanced EUS are recently introduced. EUS elastography enables practitioners to evaluate the stiffness of a target lesion and compare it with surrounding tissues (strain ratio). Also, contrast enhanced EUS is used widely with additional information such as presence of vessels and enhancement pattern of soft tissues. Several studies have been published that EUS elastography can help in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions. Although studies have been conducted to confirm the usefulness of transabdomnial ultrasound with elastography or contrast enhancement at differentiating gallbladder polyps, no prospective studies have been conducted to evaluate the usefulness of EUS elastography or contrast enhanced EUS for gallbladder polyp. Therefore, with this prospective study, we would like to evaluate the diagnostic value of EUS elastography and contrast enhanced EUS for differential diagnosis of gallbladder polyps.
Interventional prospective multicenter study: Polyp detection by an automated endoscopic tool as second observer during routine diagnostic colonoscopy
The PREEMPT CRC study is a prospective multi-center observational study to validate a blood-based test for the early detection of colorectal cancer by collecting blood samples from average-risk participants who will undergo a routine screening colonoscopy.
Anatomic Fallopian tubal patency and physiologic patency testing are feasible via hystertoscopy. This study aims to test the impact of different types of intrauterine polyp(s) on Darwish test (office hysteroscopic bubble suction test and tubal peristalsis).